RJ_FO

I see things differently, but we can agree to disagree. From my perspective, this is something pilots are trained on from the very first steps of becoming aviators, and it’s our responsibility to maintain that knowledge. Perhaps some ATPs don’t keep up with it (though I doubt many fall into that category), but to this day I always scan for the “what if” scenario. I am far from taking credits away from Sully, but many other aviatiors would have followed the same steps. There has been other events similar to Sully (Air Ural A321 a few years ago, also a 737 that had to dish into a river in Indonesia iirc). I’d be curious how you would feel if someone came here and spoke about your profession in the same way? I was far from scolding him, trust me.

So I guess you think an airline pilot is only good at playing with a MCDU or FMS uh? You have no idea how many of us started our careers. Many airline pilots come from being CFIs, flying corporate, serving in the military, or other ways. How do you think we build the minimum required hours to make it to a flight deck? You dont start a career flying an airliner, you start flying a Cessna/Piper, etc. and make your way up. How dare you refer to us as “more than a bus driver.” Next time you board an airliner, feel free to speak to the flight crew that way and see how they react. I find your impression of airline pilots insulting. Regarding the Hudson river incident, any well trained pilot would have reacted the same (this is basic private pilot skills here, simulate engine failure and find a spot to land). It doesnt matter if you fly a Cessna or an Airbus, find the best glide speed, pick up a spot and land the plane. If you believe that being a desktop simmer gives you more knowledge than a professional pilot — and it doesn’t even have to be an airline pilot btw — then good for you. I guess you think you know more than an ATP who studied for years and spent 1,500 hours (1200 restricted ATP) flying before even starting a career. Tell that to anyone that had to grind getting to the airlines, corporate, etc., with all the personal sacrifices that comes with this job (as many other jobs). We train on Level D simulators where we practice multiple failure scenarios, so yes — I know how to recognize a defective flight model or systems, and level D also have bugs, which we can recognize. From what I see with certain products, even though they had airline pilots on their team, the product came out with bugs (and I am sure these bugs were identified, the developers chose to ignore due to deadlines or other reasons). I am not against open betas, but also realize that this needs to be managed, and most of devs here are small teams and managing a large beta takes resources away from other tasks.

I recently found myself in a similar situation on Discord while trying to advise the developers of a certain product (I’ll keep their name out) that some of their new features weren’t realistic from an airliner perspective. Their fan club immediately started making fun of me, and even the dev joined in. At this point I won’t bother anymore — sometimes it just feels very toxic to give an opinion or state facts. On the other hand, plenty of developers genuinely appreciate our feedback and value our input. I was a simmer long before I became an airline pilot, so the idea that we “don’t understand simmers’ requirements” is bogus. There are plenty of airline guys who were simmers and still sim to this day. We’re not trying to dictate anything (we just want to help); we want realistic products that simulate things properly. I use FS to prepare for recurrent, and I feel ready when I hit the sim thanks to the realistic simulation products we have available nowadays.

I would definitely try SI. I use it and although ATC still has a few issues, they are sending updates weekly and for me as an airline pilot, I absolutely love the ability to get calls from the FA informing us of pax having medical issue, misbehaving pax, etc. You can talk to your FA like a real captain and ask the questions we would ask IRL. The FA will respond to you appropriately. I havent used the virtual FO as there are some limitations and I use FS2Crew. I want to applaud Anil for his upcoming tool and wish him all the best!

hey guys, anyone else in the U.S having issues running the FS2C Product Manager or running the products in the sim? (others are reporting the issue on the FS2C discord). According to Brian on Discord, there is some sort of outage, and he recommends installing Cloudflare One Client. I use another VPN and have tried connecting to a few servers around the world but no luck.

very nice scenery and screenshots, thx Ryan! Brings back memories of my time at NetJets flying the global. TEB is a super busy airport and the departure procedures are tight. Always challenged myself and refused to turn on the AP right after takeoff and hand flew the SID (with that lovely 1500 restriction, you get to 1500 very quick and have to be on your game if hand flying).

1) It depends but really after checklists/paperwork and debriefs are done, we usually head out pretty quickly. Sometimes we even head out before the pax as we have to get to another aircraft and we're running late (or on go home day when you need to rush out to get to your flight home). Sometime we wait for the pax to be out before heading out (so everyone can leave to either the shuttle to the hotel or get to a new plane, etc.).. 2) I usually clean my side with wipes everytime I take over from another crew. Hope this helps, any question just lmk...

It doesnt look like they included weather radar yet, it's a shame because this is one of the best addon, hopefully it will be added soon.

It looks to me like this is a server-side settings issue. I am forced to use the Edge browser to visit the AVSIM forums, I hope they can look into this and fix it as it is annoying switching from one browser to another just to visit one site.

same problem here. I cleared my cookies and after one successful request to the forums, I get the same 404 error again on the next click. What happened? AVSIM is the only site doing this. Is it a server setting that was changed to reduce headers size (I understand it could be related to security)

I just listened to a podcast where Elon Musk was talking about building robots and the impact of AI. He was basically saying any work related to computers will be gone and replaced by AI (and let's not forget self driving cars and so on). I am towards the end of my career, but I do worry about the kind of future the younger generations will be faced with. I was in IT before being an airline pilot and worked on cloud/automation (Infra/Software as a service, etc.), it made a lot of jobs obsolete, but created other jobs. I dont know if this will be the case with AI. Elon was basically saying that in a perfect world, nobody would have to work and that there would be some sort of unversal income, I just dont see this happening. We already saw Airbus push for single pilot operations, granted it is for extended minimum crew operations (only one pilot in the flightdeck ion cruise, and the other "resting", but this is how it starts, more jobs to be lost. We are living in a very uncertain world nowadays....

indeed 🙂

That is correct. Been stuck a few times there because we exceeded limitations and had to explain the pax that even though they could see all the corporate traffic departs, we couldnt... lol Another interesting facts is when on the approach, you see departing traffic coming straight at you, but you know they will make a right turn eventually (I did get a bit nervous my first time landing there).

Hi all, I am having a strange issue with XP12 in VR (other sims are not having this issue). There is some sort of invisible box in the left screen of the headset that seems to be rendering enhanced graphics (is that foveated? sorry I am not too aware of the latest and greatest). But this makes it impossible for me to fly XP in VR. I dont have openXR install and go via SteamVR/OpenPimax. Googling seems to indicate I would have to edit some files in steamVR (or OpenXR) to disable foveated but before I start spending too much time on this I wanted to see if anyone here knew what I was talking about and had some sort of fix to this? The latest XP looks awesome and I cant wait to fly it in VR. Thank you in advance!

Agree with the responses above (I am CL65 rated), full flaps and a 2.5 degrees nose up should do the trick. The flight model has been improved and it flies much better than previous version. It's too bad no one is doing a 200 version,many differences (Flight model, less automation, etc.) than the 550/700/900 (I must admit the 200 is a dog in the summer and you wont find anyone loving that bird lol)

I run both Ini350 and Fenix and have no issues whatsoever with both products in VR. I am running with pretty high settings as I run a 5090 (also running Say Intentions Traffic). I dont think you will have any issues with a 4090. FSL is also running ok but there are some design issues in VR (Tablet is too small and some of the clickspots are a bit difficult). I say go for it, a 4090 is definitely powerful enough to run airliners in VR. Enjoy!

I don't believe this addon is worth it in its current state. It's been out for quite some time (I am not a developer so I can't speak about what it takes to get LNAV/VNAV coded) and as others stated LNAV is not great and VNAV is nowhere to be found, and the product has been out for quite some time. On the positive side, the cockpit and textures are good, even in VR. I also like the sounds (the rattling effect on Take off is spot on) They still have a long way to go, EFB needs work, no ATSU (simbrief integration is implemented) but they are not close to anything like FSL/FNX/PMDG, etc. I've jumpseated on that beast quite often to know its quirks, and I hope they can reproduce how sometimes the Autothrottle needs to be overriden by the PF.... It's got potential, but they are taking way too much time to get it right (IMO)

yes same here, awful performance in both fs20 & fs24. I think they need to widen their beta testers pool with a various range of hardware (I have a 7950X3D 16 core/64GB RAM and a RTX5090 and it is unusable in VR). 1.0.8 ran ok on my rig

Hi Jim, Was this using live weather? I havent been able to get any returns on the CRJ (I'm CL65 TR). I've ready somewhere that the radar only works with weather presets, was it the case in your screenshot? Thx!

+1, also is anyone having issues with their weather radar? It seems to only paint returns when there is a TS around.

I wouldnt think so. My airline has a strict 10kts tailwind limitation, anything over that, no can do. Perhaps the tower reported a different wind condition and the crew elected to land on that runway. I dont think these guys would put their job on the line busting SOPs 🙂 5200' is right around the limit for a 737 (not a 900)

Just hit the APU Master (the one on the left) once and release immediately (no extended click), as Jim stated, you should see the associated message in CAS (APU In Byte, etc.), once the APU DOOR OPEN message is on, then click on APU START. Hope this helps!

Hi guys, Ex SkyWest pilot here also, this is the technique used a few years ago, might not be up to date but I think it's enough to understand how to operate the CRJ during takeoff. Not sure what issue Ryan was having with SPD mode, but it is pretty solid (from what I remember flying the CRJ). Hope this helps, any question dont hesitate to reach out. NORMAL TAKEOFF CALLOUTS RLNG T/O Parameters PF PM PF: TLs ≈70% N1, stabilize, set w/in 5% below Target N1 “SET THRUST” PM: set N1 Thrust Limit “THRUST SET” STATIC: Release brakes after stable at ≈ 70% N1 MAX PERF T/O: Release brakes after target N1 set and PM states “THRUST SET” Through 80 knots “80 knots” “CHECK” Passing V1, VR, and V2 Pitch up 3° per second to V2+20 “V1”, “ROTATE”, “V2” PM Verify Positive Rate of Climb “POSITIVE RATE” PF Verify Positive Rate of Climb “GEAR UP” “GEAR UP” After gear retraction (about time aircraft reaches FD bar) or “SPEED MODE, HDG MODE” “SPEED MODE, HDG MODE” “SPEED MODE, NAV MODE” “SPEED MODE, NAV MODE” Maintain V2+20 until MFRA Confirm modes on FMA ≥ 600’ AGL and <FL200 “AUTOPILOT ON” “AUTOPILOT ON” 1,000’ AGL or MFRA “CLIMB SEQUENCE” Accelerate to 200 kts Retract flaps on schedule, when flaps at zero “FLAPS UP” Leaving 1,500’ AFE “AFTER TAKEOFF CHECK” Set CLM thrust, After T/O flow, “AFTER T/O CHECK COMPLETE” Above 2,500’ AFE (Rad Alt reference begins at 2,500 AGL) Accelerate to 250 kts

Have you set up the trim according to the performance info from the EFB? That could be a reason why you rotate before V1...

Jorn, iirc the inibuild preview on YT had a 350 captain on the stream with them