November 4, 201312 yr Is the -200ER just a typo then? Edit: By that I mean it will not feature in the next expansion pack for the T7? But possibly after.
November 4, 201312 yr I'm pretty much always on-side with your opinions, Kyle, but I wonder if you mis-read the comments. The page is a "-300ER expansion pack" page, yet mentions the "-200ER" in it's description. The question was if this was a typo or not - and if not, why is it called the -300ER pack if it contains the -200ER? Yea, yea, I know it's just a placeholder page! B) Karl Brooker
November 5, 201312 yr Commercial Member I'm pretty much always on-side with your opinions, Kyle, but I wonder if you mis-read the comments. The page is a "-300ER expansion pack" page, yet mentions the "-200ER" in it's description. The question was if this was a typo or not - and if not, why is it called the -300ER pack if it contains the -200ER? Yea, yea, I know it's just a placeholder page! B) Intro manual 0.00.7. Last paragraph. Sentence one. Mixed page for a mixed sentence... ...as always...intro manual :wink: Kyle Rodgers
November 5, 201312 yr Yes...they're subtly hinting at something that's in the intro manual as a future expansion by secretly placing it in the storefront for people to find... Oh this is good :LMAO: :LMAO: :LMAO: Kind regards Werner Gillespie CYB2400Proud member of Cyber Air Virtual AirlinesAVSIM Staff Member
November 5, 201312 yr How much do we have to pay? 150 milions $. I'm pretty much always on-side with your opinions, Kyle, but I wonder if you mis-read the comments. The page is a "-300ER expansion pack" page, yet mentions the "-200ER" in it's description. The question was if this was a typo or not - and if not, why is it called the -300ER pack if it contains the -200ER? I am 99% sure its a typo, the 200ER is mentioned only once but the 300ER is mentioned 5-6 times Stas H. IVAO ID 234784 VATSIM ID 999196
November 5, 201312 yr Commercial Member I am 99% sure its a typo, the 200ER is mentioned only once but the 300ER is mentioned 5-6 times ...now you're just asserting that I didn't do my job. (If you don't get it, check one of the last pages) Kyle Rodgers
November 7, 201312 yr ...now you're just asserting that I didn't do my job. (If you don't get it, check one of the last pages) I'd say he was referring to the webpage. In there there are 6 mentions of the 300ER in text and one mention of 200ER. I don't think he refers to the manuals. --Peter Fabian
November 7, 201312 yr I'd say he was referring to the webpage. In there there are 6 mentions of the 300ER in text and one mention of 200ER. I don't think he refers to the manuals. Correct Stas H. IVAO ID 234784 VATSIM ID 999196
November 7, 201312 yr Commercial Member I'd say he was referring to the webpage. Correct Sure, it may be a typo on the page, but the 200ER is referenced in the intro manual. So, its business on the page shouldn't be used as evidence against the idea that the model is intended. Kyle Rodgers
November 7, 201312 yr Commercial Member Well I am looking forward to the 300er no doubt!! 200ER a little more, but both will certainly be more favourable than the 77L ;-P.. Alex Alex Ridge Join Fswakevortex here! YOUTUBE and FACEBOOK
November 8, 201312 yr What a rip off! In under two minutes I found one for $52mil! http://www.aviatorsale.com/aix7881/ This one is even cheaper! http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/detail.aspx?OHID=1269049 I wonder how much you could get one for from storage in Victorville, CA? Matthew Bellette
Create an account or sign in to comment