Taxi lines have disappeared on my airport KMFE. Also noticed a bit of inconsistencies regarding FPS, might roll back to 10.45.

 

Regarding autogen, I guess it only affects tall buildings as I don't see much of a difference, still see too many campers all around.

I have:

 

AutoGate

FJCC_FMC

FlyWithLua

FSWidgetsEFBXP

FSWidgetsVARS

g2xpl

Gizmo64.plugin

HangarOps

PluginAdmin

QPACTerrainData

X-Camera

XPLM.framework

XPWidgets.framework

 

X-Plane 10.50b1 works with these plug-ins in my case.

 

 

Thanks

ATC has lost its mind.

Reverted back to 10.45 and all is well again. So glad X-plane has that ability!  I will wait until 10.5 becomes RC and then try again.

 

Rob

xplane major betas are always very unstable specially the first 2 iterations. If you expected to enjoy those promising new features just from the first beta it won't happen. Betas break things, specially at first, they are introducing tons of new code here!

I installed a second copy of XPX. I don't see any of the new autogen. I did a test flight over Manhattan NY. It looks exactly like 10.45. Anybody seeing the new autogen ?

I installed a second copy of XPX. I don't see any of the new autogen. I did a test flight over Manhattan NY. It looks exactly like 10.45. Anybody seeing the new autogen ?

 

i did not installed 10.50 yet, i will do later when at home.

 

how is your "number of object" settings on rendering? that could be?

i did not installed 10.50 yet, i will do later when at home.

 

how is your "number of object" settings on rendering? that could be?

 

extreme 

Taxi lines have disappeared on my airport KMFE. 

 

known issue for the first beta. the notes here

 

http://developer.x-plane.com

Hmm ... also flew over Manhattan, it looks basically the same as 10.45 and nothing like the preview which they showed at Flightcon. maybe they forgot to update the library.txt file?

Question for a new user here.

 

When the updater asks to proceed with some scenery files and other airport files....is it ok to proceed with updating these files?  Would it affect the external HD Mesh or any other custom files I have added?

 

I do recall reading somewhere that it was preferable to not update these. Any thoughts please?

I flew over Manhattan and had the new autogen... It looks great but my old system ( 2500k) can't handle it with the IXEG 737

I flew over Manhattan and had the new autogen... It looks great but my old system ( 2500k) can't handle it with the IXEG 737

 

Post a pic !

Question for a new user here.

 

When the updater asks to proceed with some scenery files and other airport files....is it ok to proceed with updating these files?  Would it affect the external HD Mesh or any other custom files I have added?

 

I do recall reading somewhere that it was preferable to not update these. Any thoughts please?

Short answer is no. It's going to replace the files that are missing that you replaced it with. 

Nice to see that 10.50 is now in beta. Not surprised that it causes many problems for users, as it's a beta.

 

Please remember to report any bugs here:

 

http://dev.x-plane.com/support/bugreport.html

Hmm ... also flew over Manhattan, it looks basically the same as 10.45 and nothing like the preview which they showed at Flightcon. maybe they forgot to update the library.txt file?

 

I think the buildings appearing will depend to the stored "height" information in the used OSM data. Default X-Plane has very old OSM data - quite likely there are only few buildings in Manhattan tagged with "height" - so you won´t see the new autogen.

 

Download the latest HDScenery from AlpilotX - he is using more recent OSM data and that might affect your buildings... Just a hunch, I haven´t tested that myself.

 

In the end it comes down to crowdsourcing, again. If you want to help in the long run, go tagging in OSM :-)

 

Jan