January 12, 20179 yr Having to use FSX to fly it bugs me more. you say you dont come here to complain and he you go having to use fsx I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card, RM850 power supply Peter kelberg
January 12, 20179 yr you say you dont come here to complain and he you go having to use fsx Well, it is my first and only complaint for 2017 :smile: System: MSFS2024, ASUS Rog Stryx Z790-A, Intel i9-14900KF, Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 , Asus Hyperion Case,Rog Stryx 4090 OC, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO SSD,64Gb G Skill Memory, Asus Aura 1200W Gold PSU,Win 11 ,LG C4 48" 4K OLED Screen., Airbus TCA Full Kit, Stream Deck XL. WinWing FCU, EFIS, MCDU
January 12, 20179 yr Lol amusing isn't it :-) Seems they have some other issues on their hands... I am not a programmer, I just buy and fly these. But I thought programmers have to write their simulator programs to fit the platform on which its going to run? Not write it and then ask the LM guys to alter the platform to fit the sim?
January 12, 20179 yr But I thought programmers have to write their simulator programs to fit the platform on which its going to run? Not write it and then ask the LM guys to alter the platform to fit the sim? true so fsl writes the programe for example for p3d v2.x than LM after awhile updates to p3d.y which than changes the parameters, this is why fsx is different it cant be changed no more it what it is now I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card, RM850 power supply Peter kelberg
January 12, 20179 yr i'm happy I can at least reinstall fsx and profit from the best a320 available... Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 13, 20179 yr i'm happy I can at least reinstall fsx and profit from the best a320 available... You are only happy when you can uninstall and reinstall :smile: System: MSFS2024, ASUS Rog Stryx Z790-A, Intel i9-14900KF, Asus ROG Ryujin III 360 , Asus Hyperion Case,Rog Stryx 4090 OC, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO SSD,64Gb G Skill Memory, Asus Aura 1200W Gold PSU,Win 11 ,LG C4 48" 4K OLED Screen., Airbus TCA Full Kit, Stream Deck XL. WinWing FCU, EFIS, MCDU
January 13, 20179 yr I was on the fence with it being 140$ but I have the AS versions so the upgrade at that price is too steep for me at this time. They also require you have the latest version of P3D installed which has OOM issues which is another reason I'll pass. Happy with P3D 3,35 or whatever the last 3.3 version was. Maybe ill get it later this year when P3D comes out with a better version and I have 140$ to burn. Richie Walsh
January 13, 20179 yr You are only happy when you can uninstall and reinstall :smile:Haha...jcomm..how do u manage to find so much time?? Thanks,Pankaj Dekate
January 13, 20179 yr You are only happy when you can uninstall and reinstall :smile: :smile: Me? Uninstall ? Never ! Well, honestly, it stopped the moment I discovered I love DCS and IL.2 - those are here to stay.. but this Airbus masterpiece is making me dream of using it and since I do not ask for fancy graphics and scenery, I believe it could run great in my old rig... fsx:se would turn into my Airbus sim only :-) Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 13, 20179 yr true so fsl writes the programe for example for p3d v2.x than LM after awhile updates to p3d.y which than changes the parameters, this is why fsx is different it cant be changed no more it what it is now And it's probably also why X-Plane isn't so famous among developers as fsx still is... They're sort of "unstable" platforms for someone willing to make sound investments with it... Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 13, 20179 yr I keep asking on FSL forums but it seems no one want to answer so I will ask here What is the VAS foot print of the FSL A320 within FSX. PMDG 777 was around 700-750. That was a new high at the time of release. So whats FSL's ? Because if it's no higher I dont see what all the fuss is about? David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
January 13, 20179 yr Longest final ever. We're on the runway excursion phase already. CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
January 13, 20179 yr Did not find specific data but found a guy who tested FSLABS A320 on default FSX with ONLY FSUIPC installed. He was on DX9 and stated he had 1,2-1,4 GB of VAS left on spawn. so 2,8 GB of VAS consumed without addon airport and any textures is a HOG. Much more than PMDG, which in my case on default scenery was never over 2,4 GB. I get 3,0 at start with NGX on Flightbeam KIAD (3,2 with triple 7) with all addon airports (21) I have loaded into my scenery and all texture packs like REX4, ENVTEX, FSGlobal, FTX Global, Vector, Landclass and few ORBX regions. One thing to keep in mind - FSX DX9 sucks big time with regards to VAS management. Tomasz Zawadzki
January 13, 20179 yr Here are the figures of VAS left, measured with FSUIPC, in a fresh and untweaked install of FSX SE, with FTX Global installed, default weather theme ("fair weather"), REX 4 Texture Direct and ASCA textures, default EDDK scenery (sitting on RWY32R at 12:30pm), with Ezdok v2 running and in DX10 with Steve´s DX10 fixer (including his cloud shadows addon): default Trike: 2945682 PMDG T7: 2283112 A320X: 2002720 So, it has a greater VAS footprint, but that can be easily explained by the sheer depth of system modelling, I think. P.S.: Sliders in FSX are set like suggested on the FS Labs Forum, exept for scenery, which is set to "dense" instead of "normal". And water is set to "mid 2x" to make Steve´s cloud shadows work in DX10.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.