May 20, 20206 yr I’m away from my gaming PC (for a week or so unfortunately) could someone confirm 1) the 3 degree line on HUD on approach is no longer moving with the bank of the plane and stays parallel with the horizon 2) when you have the VSD on the ND, at the lowest range scale - the scale at the bottom should read 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10nm (the 7.5 number used to say 8, and once I saw it I couldn’t un-see it....) Minor issues I know but it probably 2 things that really bugged me a bit. Thanks! Edited May 20, 20206 yr by silentghostx MSFS2024: FENIX A319/320/321 | Aerosoft/Toliss A340-600 | TFDi MD-11F | iniBuilds A350 | FBW A380 | PMDG 77W NZAA | YPPH AMD7800X3D | RTX4090 | 32GB DDR5
May 20, 20206 yr The default gauge refresh rate is 18/sec in the QW787.cfg file. Perhaps change it up but of course the consequences may be decreased performance. You may find a sweet spot for your setup. Worse case, put it back to default. Source is the manual pg 411 CYVR LSZH I7-14700k 64gb 6000Mhz DDR5 ASUS z690 ROG STRIX Gaming RTX 4080 Super,
May 20, 20206 yr @silentghostx On 2) - that is as you want - 7.5 On 1) - how do you enable the -3 degree line PC=9700K@5Ghz+RTX2070 VR=HP Reverb| Software = Windows 10 | Flight SIms = P3D, CAP2, DCS World, IL-2, Aerofly FS2
May 20, 20206 yr 4 hours ago, Chock said: Better get used to that shape if you like airliners. It is the most efficient one aerodynamically for a subsonic airliner; a design profile which minimises surface area to reduce friction drag, but affords a good forward and downward view for the pilots. That being so, and because these days things tend to be designed using computer analysis for the shape, you can expect most new airliner designs which fly sub-sonic, to employ that profile because it is the one which works best. Ironically enough though, long before all that computer analysis malarkey, when designers had to actually build models and test them in wind tunnels, DeHavilland engineers determined that was the best aerodynamic shape, so that's why their DH.106 Comet ended up looking that way, and of course in a (pre-Airbus) Anglo-French collaboration, Sud Aviation used the DeHavilland findings for their own Caravelle design, which shares the front end structure as the Comet. So at least from the front end, those two airliners were very much ahead of their time. Luckily the A350 isn't nearly as ugly and actually looks pretty good. 😉 (And I don't generally prefer Airbus over Boeing or the other way around. It's just the 787 that is hideous.) Edited May 20, 20206 yr by flycln
May 20, 20206 yr 54 minutes ago, HighTowers said: The default gauge refresh rate is 18/sec in the QW787.cfg file. Perhaps change it up but of course the consequences may be decreased performance. You may find a sweet spot for your setup. Worse case, put it back to default. Source is the manual pg 411 You can change it higher but max is 18 regardless of higher value. Dan i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber
May 20, 20206 yr 13 hours ago, Quasimodo said: Funny it doesn't say anything on the QualityWings website about it being updated to Preapr3D V5 or on the F1 purchase agent. I might buy it once I see it in print. Aha, I found it: Prepar3D v5 Compatibility The latest installers support installation into Prepar3D v5. Please note that for this new platform, our 787 comes with BETA versions of TrueGlass and RealLight. You may experience problems with flickering or corrupted textures when reloading the plane. A permanent fix is currently in the works. As soon as a solution is available we will of course provide you with an update. Developer stated in their forum that they improved it. Go to their forum and search for yourself. Edited May 20, 20206 yr by B777ER Eric
May 20, 20206 yr if you are talking about the scrolling of the altitude and speed ticker yes it's improved. Is it as good as say the NGXu or others. No. But is it much better. Yes. 5800X3D, 4090FE, 64GB DDR4 3600C16, Gigabyte X570S MB, EVO 970 M.2's, Alienware 3821DW and 2 22" monitors, Corsair RM1000x PSU, 360MM MSI MEG, MFG Crosswind, T16000M Stick, Boeing TCA Yoke/Throttle, Skalarki MCDU and FCU, Logitech Radio Panel/Switch Panel, Spad.Next
May 20, 20206 yr 1 hour ago, B777ER said: Developer stated in their forum that they improved it. Go to their forum and search for yourself. I never said they didn't. I was just looking for where they said in the store it was P3D V5 Compatible and that's what it said. That piece of info is copied and pasted straight form the F1 Purchase agent.
May 20, 20206 yr 3 minutes ago, Quasimodo said: I never said they didn't. I was just looking for where they said in the store it was P3D V5 Compatible and that's what it said. That piece of info is copied and pasted straight form the F1 Purchase agent. i agree. You would think one of the most complained about things would be mentioned if improved. 5800X3D, 4090FE, 64GB DDR4 3600C16, Gigabyte X570S MB, EVO 970 M.2's, Alienware 3821DW and 2 22" monitors, Corsair RM1000x PSU, 360MM MSI MEG, MFG Crosswind, T16000M Stick, Boeing TCA Yoke/Throttle, Skalarki MCDU and FCU, Logitech Radio Panel/Switch Panel, Spad.Next
May 20, 20206 yr 20 hours ago, Mr_LoL said: Is anyone else missing some cockpit textures in V5? It's still beta. There's numerous issues with the v5 version. Alas I'm looking forward to flying it tomorrow on v5 Edited May 20, 20206 yr by fluffyflops
May 20, 20206 yr 15 hours ago, Chapstick said: Where are people seeing the improvements in the gauge refresh rates/animations? On my install, it looks as atrocious as ever. Video showing what I mean: https://streamable.com/tiio36 That’s what I’m talking about, it’s very very low refresh rate compared to your FPS in the sim. Ron Hamilton "95% is half the truth, but most of it is lies, but if you read half of what is written, you'll be okay." __ Honey Boo Boo's Mom
May 20, 20206 yr 4 hours ago, whitav8 said: @silentghostx On 2) - that is as you want - 7.5 On 1) - how do you enable the -3 degree line Thanks heaps! I believe once you are tuned into ILS approach and you have LOC/GS armed/captured the -3 degree line shows up. MSFS2024: FENIX A319/320/321 | Aerosoft/Toliss A340-600 | TFDi MD-11F | iniBuilds A350 | FBW A380 | PMDG 77W NZAA | YPPH AMD7800X3D | RTX4090 | 32GB DDR5
May 20, 20206 yr Sadly this plane is an absolute VRAM killer. Starting up at T2G VHHH, I am already at 8.6GB of VRAM. Simply ridiculous... Greetings, Chris AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 2x32GB DDR5 6000MT/s RAM, MSI RTX 4090 Ventus 3X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS2024
May 20, 20206 yr Author 9 hours ago, silentghostx said: I’m away from my gaming PC (for a week or so unfortunately) could someone confirm 1) the 3 degree line on HUD on approach is no longer moving with the bank of the plane and stays parallel with the horizon 2) when you have the VSD on the ND, at the lowest range scale - the scale at the bottom should read 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10nm (the 7.5 number used to say 8, and once I saw it I couldn’t un-see it....) Minor issues I know but it probably 2 things that really bugged me a bit. Thanks! I can confirm that the line is moving with the airplane Ramon De Valencia AMD 9950X3D / 64GB DDR5 6000MHz / RTX 5090 / 1200 watt PSU MSFS 2020 and 2024
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.