August 17, 20205 yr If the scenery does turn out to be a bit blurry, I'm willing to accept that as a tradeoff for the 600KM cloud draw distance 😛 Seeing distant weather systems is definitely a big yes! P3Dv4 + XP11 MFS
August 17, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, JRBarrett said: In XP and P3D, terrain detail at high altitudes is typically extremely sharp. 'Typically', it is or it isn't. Never heard anybody complain that the terrain is to sharp. If anything the terrain is not sharp enough in xp, at least not on the horizon anyways. The last picture should be really sharp. Try using a faster shutter speed next time. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, RTX 4080S, Ram - 32GB, 32" 4K Monitor, WIN 11. Eric Escobar
August 17, 20205 yr 6 hours ago, langly said: The blurries and popping in/out of textures is present in every video I’ve seen thus far. It sucks but there’s probably a reason it’s still around. And the autogen. AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, RTX 4080S, Ram - 32GB, 32" 4K Monitor, WIN 11. Eric Escobar
August 17, 20205 yr Maybe just clean your monitor? Robin "Onward & Upward" ... To the Stars, & Beyond...
August 17, 20205 yr i think on the higher settings , it looks very natural to me, but then i live in a country where you almost never ever see a very clear horizon. and ofcourse there are calculation limits. + some ppl's expectations are not very realistic.
August 17, 20205 yr Yeah, now as you told us, it really looks crappy like the good old FS2004. 🙄 Dscheesus...! Edited August 17, 20205 yr by Paladin2005 Regards, Jan Ast Win 11 PC | Ryzen 7800 X3D | RTX 5080 | LG 42 C2 Cockpit 😉 | TrackIR 5 | Octavia IFR-1 | Virpil Alpha on WarBRD, Virpil CM3 Throttle, Virpil Sharka Control Panel | Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo | TM TPM Rudder
August 17, 20205 yr The MFS shots look more natural, as they take seem to take atmospheric conditions into account. The ground from FL300 is not that weirdly crisp and sharp like portrayed in some of our current sims. Obviously there's also some reduced streaming resolution based on distance, which is probably also what we're seeing but I still think the end result looks better. Not sure how much depth of field is applied in some of those shots but could also be a factor. [MSI MPG X870E Carbon | 9800X3D (PBO +200Mhz / -20 Offset) | Corsair 64GB DDR5 (Custom Timings) | RTX 4090 Founders Edition (Undervolted) | WD SNX 850X 4TB + 4TB | Antec Flux Pro]
August 17, 20205 yr 4 hours ago, suncoastflyer said: If the scenery does turn out to be a bit blurry, I'm willing to accept that as a tradeoff for the 600KM cloud draw distance 😛 Seeing distant weather systems is definitely a big yes! Ah well... speaking about airliners I rarely spend time staring out of the window on cruise altitude. Maybe some short scenic views, but I am more interested by the looks on approach or takeoff. So I can live with a bit blurriness on cruise as long as it looks great when it matters most. Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
August 17, 20205 yr Author 9 hours ago, LHookins said: Something must be wrong with my eyes. The only blurriness I see is in the bottom pictures. Yes, I'm serious. I'm also 70 years old and post-cataract surgery. Hook Click on the photos and zoom to full hd native resolution. FS2020 blurred. Xplane not blurred. [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
August 17, 20205 yr Author 9 hours ago, LHookins said: Something must be wrong with my eyes. The only blurriness I see is in the bottom pictures. Yes, I'm serious. I'm also 70 years old and post-cataract surgery. Hook Click on the photos and zoom to full hd native resolution. FS2020 blurred. Xplane not blurred. [Pc Intel i3-4160 3,6 GHz, 8 GB di RAM, GeForce RTX-3060 12 GB, Win10 Home 64 bit]
August 17, 20205 yr 1 minute ago, efis007 said: Click on the photos and zoom to full hd native resolution. FS2020 blurred. Xplane not blurred. Then XP is the sim for you 🥳 5950x3d 5.4-5.7 GHz - Asus ROG 870 Crosshair Apex - GSkill Neo 2x 24 Gb 6000 mhz / cas 26 - MSI RTX 5090 Gaming Trio OC - 1x SSD M2 6000 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Corsair 5400 case - Corsair 360 liquid cooling set - 3x 75’ TCL tv. 13600 6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - FOV : 200 degrees My flightsim vids : https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0
August 17, 20205 yr Well you have the luxury that you can choose and discard what you like of the simulator whether it is XP, P3D, FSX, FS9 and now MSF. Even so, I care very little if it gets a little blurry on either the FL200 or FL400. Agree as mentioned here, just that it looks fine during take-off and during landing with nice flow, so I am happy and of course that the sim does not crash (OOM) during flight which was commonplace in FSX where you had to constantly adjust in the fsx.cfg file.
August 17, 20205 yr 8 minutes ago, GSalden said: Then XP is the sim for you 🥳 Yes enjoy Wayne such Asus Hero Z690, Gigabyte Aorus Master 5080, I914900K, Kraken 360 AIO CPU Cooled, 96 GIGS Corsair DDR5, 32 Inch 4K by 3
August 17, 20205 yr 12 minutes ago, efis007 said: Click on the photos and zoom to full hd native resolution. I copied the pics to my desktop, then opened them in a viewer and looked at them full screen, the same as I'd see in in the sim. My desktop is 1920x1080. I can't see any higher resolution than that, unlike when I was 20, for example. 🙂 Hook Larry Hookins Oh! I have slipped the surly bonds of EarthAnd danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings;
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.