Jump to content

Prepar3D v5.3 released


ark4diusz

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, Juliett Alfa said:

For 4790K (4 cores, HT On):

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=255
P3DCoreAffinityMask=255
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

255 gives you all cores used, which would allow P3D to place a thread on virtual core 1, which would impair overall performance.  So, 253 may be better, or even 245?

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

  • Replies 575
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
7 hours ago, kevinfirth said:

When I learned the F1 GTN was not being updated anymore I went with RXP as there was a sale on at the time.  Have to say I'm very happy with the product and support.  Perhaps @RXP might consider a discount now for people who need an operable unit and switch?

 

 

 

I went with RXP purely from a service and support standpoint.

Jean Luc is very responsive in that regard.

Money well spent.

 

Posted

Anyone have a suggest for JobScheduler for the 10900K (10 cores, HT Off) or should we just let P3D configure it for us?

Also can JobScheduler be removed all together? 

Dan

i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber

Posted
1 minute ago, Wise87 said:

Anyone have a suggest for JobScheduler for the 10900K (10 cores, HT Off) or should we just let P3D configure it for us?

Also can JobScheduler be removed all together? 

I am using this at the moment

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=21845
P3DCoreAffinityMask=21845
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

Ivan Majetic

ROG CROSSHAIR X670E HERO; 7900X3D; NZXT KRAKEN ELITE 360, GIGABYTE RTX 4080; G.SKILL TridentZ NEO RGB DDR5 64 Gb, WD HDD 2TB, SAMSUNG 980PRO, SAMSUNG 970EVO Plus 2x, ALIENWARE 3423DWF

Posted
10 minutes ago, Johnny19 said:

I am using this at the moment

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=21845
P3DCoreAffinityMask=21845
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

@Wise87 I'm using those numbers but they are for 10 cores, HT on.

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

Posted

When I was on 5.3 mine was 255. This was due to HT off and using all 10 cores. I found a great Affinity Mask Calculator here even though it only goes to 8 cores. 

It lets you select the core or enter the values. 

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=255
P3DCoreAffinityMask=255
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

Dan

i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber

Posted

 

1 hour ago, Juliett Alfa said:

For 4790K (4 cores, HT On):

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=255
P3DCoreAffinityMask=255
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

1 hour ago, kevinfirth said:

255 gives you all cores used, which would allow P3D to place a thread on virtual core 1, which would impair overall performance.  So, 253 may be better, or even 245?

I have the same CPU and went with.

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=255
P3DCoreAffinityMask=252
MainThreadScheduler=2
RenderThreadScheduler=3
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

 

Still testing.

Posted

Running an i9 9900k with HT off (and no, I am not turning it on as I run my computer for long periods of time and like the cooler temps with HT off). What would be a good setting for i9 9900k with HT off?

Eric 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Wise87 said:

When I was on 5.3 mine was 255. This was due to HT off and using all 10 cores.

AM of 255 is using only 8 cores, how come all 10 cores?

Posted
2 hours ago, kevinfirth said:

I'm using those numbers but they are for 10 cores, HT on.

Hi Kevin,

If I’m not mistaken, that should be 8 cores (16LPs). As you may have noted from my signature, I’ve been using that value with my i7-5960X quite effectively for some time now. No harm in using for a CPU with more cores as it leaves the remaining cores free to be assigned for use with various 3rd Party Addons.

Regards,

Mike

Posted

[JobScheduler]
AffinityMask=255
P3DCoreAffinityMask=255
MainThreadScheduler=0
RenderThreadScheduler=2
FrameWorkerThreadScheduler=4

This is what my config says , i have a 9700k 8 physical cores only , is this right. i thought you didnt need Am if you had stright cores only ,  thought it only applied to HT ?

ROG Crossair Hero X670e , 9900X, TUF 4090 , X4 NVME's. OS  2TB 980 Pro , MSFS  2TB WD Black , Kington Fury 64GB ram ( 6000) Corsair RM1000 PSU, Artic Freezer iii 360 AIO  . Phanteks P600s Case ,TCL QM8B 50" 120 Hz  TV,second 24 inch screen for charts you tube etc, and 11" touch screen for the EFB. Warthog Stick and TCA Captains throttle ( full pack)  Velocity 1 Rudder Pedals , extreme3D for the Tiller,Streamdeck XL x2 / Streamdeck +/Streamdeck mini because i like pressing buttons 

Posted
45 minutes ago, Cruachan said:

Hi Kevin,

If I’m not mistaken, that should be 8 cores (16LPs). As you may have noted from my signature, I’ve been using that value with my i7-5960X quite effectively for some time now. No harm in using for a CPU with more cores as it leaves the remaining cores free to be assigned for use with various 3rd Party Addons.

Regards,

Mike

Thanks Mike, but nope.  I'm using a 10850K, with 10 cores, just only using 8 of them for P3D and leaving the other 2 masked off for addon exe's

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

Posted
3 hours ago, Dirk98 said:

AM of 255 is using only 8 cores, how come all 10 cores?

I stand corrected. It was 1023. 

Dan

i9-13900K / Asus Maximus Hero Z790 / RTX 4090 FE / G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64 GB DDR5-6400 CL32 / Artic Liquid Freezer II 360 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 1TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 980 PRO SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 2TB PCIe NVMe M.2 / EVGA 1000W G3, 80+ Gold / Phanteks Eclipse P600S ATX Mid Tower / Arctic P14 PWM Case Fans / LG C2 42 Inch Class 4K OLED TV/Monitor / Windows 11 Pro / 1Ghz AT&T Fiber

Posted
7 hours ago, Wise87 said:

Anyone have a suggest for JobScheduler for the 10900K (10 cores, HT Off) or should we just let P3D configure it for us?

Also can JobScheduler be removed all together? 

Yep on the deleted jobscheduler section Running W11 tho and no issues on Stock P3D 5.3. Still stops and stutters not sure what's going on there, 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...