I like Pilot2ATc but had to stop using it because it uses almost 2.5 GB of my 16GB RAM. Can anyone open the task manager and see how much RAM FSHud is using?

Thanks.

51 minutes ago, awf said:

Big plus also is not the need anymore for crash TC here local from AIG

Yes, Traffic Control for AIG is not needed if you use FShud.

Edited July 12, 20223 yr by airlinejets

24 minutes ago, Alvega said:

I like Pilot2ATc but had to stop using it because it uses almost 2.5 GB of my 16GB RAM. Can anyone open the task manager and see how much RAM FSHud is using?

Thanks.

Yep will have a look in flight at the gate now 1.8 GB

4 minutes ago, awf said:

Yep will have a look in flight at the gate now 1.8 GB

PF3 uses 20 MB of ram. 

5 minutes ago, awf said:

Yep will have a look in flight at the gate now 1.8 GB

Hmm, It doesn't seem much different then. Though it would be less. Thanks.

1 minute ago, Bobsk8 said:

PF3 uses 20 MB of ram. 

That's more like it, lol. If only the voices were not the most robotic in any ATC program, I would use that one. But can't stand the voices.

1 minute ago, Alvega said:

Hmm, It doesn't seem much different then. Though it would be less. Thanks.

My guess is also the AI traffic it manages

1 minute ago, Alvega said:

That's more like it, lol. If only the voices were not the most robotic in any ATC program, I would use that one. But can't stand the voices.

Same here...

10 minutes ago, Alvega said:

That's more like it, lol. If only the voices were not the most robotic in any ATC program, I would use that one. But can't stand the voices.

Lat couple of updates I believe  they changes some of the voices, sounds pretty good now, at least better than most of the other ATC programs. 

 

1 hour ago, FSHud said:

Thank you,
I think it is also can be mixed with VATSIM/IVAO flights...
For example if you are entering non-controlled area.
You can use Suspend/Resume switch on the panel (bottom left corner) - to avoid complete start. The application can be quickly suspended and resumed.

Yes, this opens up possibilities! However, doesn't suspend currently also end the flight? Or has this been fixed/changed also? 

23 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

Lat couple of updates I believe  they changes some of the voices, sounds pretty good now, at least better than most of the other ATC programs. 

 

I may have to give another try then. Thanks.

4 hours ago, FSHud said:

it is required to completely re-write all panel in another programming language/technology - something that can't be done in 2 days or week.

Why wasn't this done from the beginning? You would've saved yourself a lot of work in the long run. The way you make it sound, this isn't high on your to-do list, or is it?

Of course my option would be to integrate it seamlessly into MSFS. This is a win win situation for you and your customers. It's worth the extra effort.

2 minutes ago, airlinejets said:

Why wasn't this done from the beginning? You would've saved yourself a lot of work in the long run.

It wasn’t written just for MSFS is my guess. 

Just now, espent said:

It wasn’t written just for MSFS is my guess. 

Yes, that's probably the answer. I hadn't taken that into consideration.

@FSHud I understand MSFS stops using the content.xml with SU10. Have you received any documentation from Asobo on how FSHud will read scenarios going forward?