1 hour ago, pete_auau said:

looks ok but  i be  still be  using  simbrief

Me too. No fuel management and also the SID and STARS automatically selected by the planner are odd.

15 minutes ago, Vineguy said:

I have been using this for over a week and it works great. How did you get color? Mine is black and white.

Bob G.

Probably your selections on the right hand menu.

I thank you sir. 

35 minutes ago, MrFuzzy said:

Me too. No fuel management and also the SID and STARS automatically selected by the planner are odd.

All the automatic options are odd... and rather useless. Which is why I still use SimBrief (the app the EFB btw). I think this will become better once they add the announced real world routes.

I really need to have a sit down and play with this over the weekend, I've been used to using the in game World Map to plan routes up until now (I don't use simbrief/navigraph/LNM etc to plan anything only LNM for in game map usage). 

What I like to do is plan routes with decent vistas, I rarely fly over flat land, so if it has a height map for terrain that l that'd be cool. If not then I hope that could get added one day.

2 hours ago, CFIJose said:

It's free but their Navigraph flight planner with charts is not free. The new MSFS flight planner is similar to the Navigraph flight planner without the monthly cost.

Is the new flight planner in MSFS2024 coming with all airport charts too?

3 hours ago, sloppysmusic said:

True but... If you can afford 2024 at release you really can't be too poor to pay like 12 bucks a month right? 

I'm all for competition and anti monopoly too but if this pushes Navigraph to do more I'd be interested to see what that is!

Don't know a thing what people is talking about. Navigraph full subscription costs the equivalent to 7,25 $/month (US$ 88 per year, approx.).

4 minutes ago, edpatino said:

Is the new flight planner in MSFS2024 coming with all airport charts too?

LIDO and FAA charts

This could be another example of the wrong (in my opinion) philosophy being employed by the MSFS franchise management (i.e. MS/Asobo) regarding the FS ecosystem. They want absolutely everything.

No wonder why deafult AI Traffic, ATC, Camera System, Flight Planner, Weather (I'm maybe missing others, for sure) are still incomplete and nobody knows when they'll be put in an acceptable working condition.

Instead of collaborating with specialized developers that know how to do things better, they opted out for everything, like a bureaucratic populist centralized kind of third world government.

Sorry if it sounds rude, but I'm hugely disappointed. 

Edited December 5, 20241 yr by edpatino

6 minutes ago, edpatino said:

This could be another example of the wrong (in my opinion) philosophy being employed by the MSFS franchise management (i.e. MS/Asobo) regarding the FS ecosystem. They want absolutely everything.

No wonder why deafult AI Traffic, ATC, Camera System, Flight Planner, Weather (I'm maybe missing others, for sure) are still incomplete and nobody knows when they'll be put in an acceptable working condition.

Instead of collaborating with specialized developers that know how to do things better, they opted out for everything, like a bureaucratic populist centralized kind of third world government.

Sorry if it sounds rude, but I'm hugely disappointed. 

The Flight Planner is created by Working Title, they are specialists so to speak.

8 minutes ago, MarcG said:

The Flight Planner is created by Working Title, they are specialists so to speak.

Maybe in avionics they'll do better 😉

2 hours ago, Vineguy said:

I have been using this for over a week and it works great. How did you get color? Mine is black and white.

Bob G.

Bob,
Have you been able to determine where the flight plans are located once created and saved at the web site?  I am not able to determine how to get them into the MSFS G3000.  The send to avionics is getting them to GNS 430/530, but not to G3000.

2 hours ago, MrFuzzy said:

Me too. No fuel management and also the SID and STARS automatically selected by the planner are odd.

This is strange, sids and stars are not automatically selected when I use the planner. They also said in the live stream that fuel management is coming in an update to the planner.

1 minute ago, Lotharen said:

This is strange, sids and stars are not automatically selected when I use the planner. They also said in the live stream that fuel management is coming in an update to the planner.

Yes, you have to push a button to add SIDs and STARs.

Good news about the fuel management coming, I will re-evaluate the application in a few weeks. Hopefully it will develop well.

2 hours ago, edpatino said:

Don't know a thing what people is talking about. Navigraph full subscription costs the equivalent to 7,25 $/month (US$ 88 per year, approx.).

More like $10 US which equals $120. I have nothing against the team at Navigraph because they have been an integral part of our community. The navdata service is also a major reason why they are the standard. Having said that, WT is also great at what they do and are now working with ASOBO. So we need to consider all options.

But I see how you feel about ASOBO using the community of experts to improve 2024 and beyond. It still perplexes me that they have not got AIG on board.