MSFS 24', read the posts on how bad some folks say it is, I figured maybe ?, it's not that bad, give it the benefit of the doubt, YMMV but well...it's bad, it really is bad, load times double 2020', textures worse etc. etc. got a refund, this is a early beta at best even with the latest updates, plenty updates to come to get this software near right, again YMMV, if it works good for you, wonderful.

You live in alternate universe. 2024 graphic is significantly better than in 2020. I don't know what is a problem in YMMV I have never had a chance explored it. May be you streaming speed is to low or graphic settings... Hard to tell. 

32 minutes ago, jymp said:

well...it's bad, it really is bad, load times double 2020', textures worse

Load times shorter and textures better here.  

 

Edited December 25, 20241 yr by MrBitstFlyer

Yea, there are a lot of issues with 2024 but my load time is consistently under 2 minutes and textures and lighting are much better than 2020. Are you sure there is not a setting issue?

Ok. There is a reason why people need to add 2024 to their title of their posts so we know which simulator they're talking about.

10 minutes ago, Sonosusto said:

Ok. There is a reason why people need to add 2024 to their title of their posts so we know which simulator they're talking about.

In  the  op's  opening  words  he  said msfs 2024

8 minutes ago, pete_auau said:

In  the  op's  opening  words  he  said msfs 2024

Sure. You're right about that.

So, that being said, it's the reason why I said what I said. To prevent confusion. The CEO/President made their point for a reason. I am merely a member here. Why it should be changed to be tagged as 2024 to prevent confusion.

Especially when your main title is very ambiguous like "benefit of the doubt" could mean literally anything. REX? PMDG? 2020? 2024?

 

Edited December 25, 20241 yr by Sonosusto

Remember when they said we didn't need separate forums because all the posts would be tagged with that little blue button? yeah

2 hours ago, jymp said:

MSFS 24', read the posts on how bad some folks say it is, I figured maybe ?, it's not that bad, give it the benefit of the doubt, YMMV but well...it's bad, it really is bad, load times double 2020', textures worse etc. etc. got a refund, this is a early beta at best even with the latest updates, plenty updates to come to get this software near right, again YMMV, if it works good for you, wonderful.

Two things you need to do:

1/ Re install as recommended by Asobo to adress the texture issue.

2/ Windows clock settings to sync your computer time which will fix your long loading times.

3/ Thank me later

He installed, unistalled, refunded, posted... a simple drive by. 

2 hours ago, sd_flyer said:

I don't know what is a problem in YMMV I have never had a chance explored it.

Yeah, that's what I thought when I first read it, somewhere in Melbourne. But I think he means, Your Mileage May Vary.

25 minutes ago, Highmike said:

Yeah, that's what I thought when I first read it, somewhere in Melbourne. But I think he means, Your Mileage May Vary.

Yes I figured! This thread is another useless trash of transient drama queen 😞

My experience with FS 2024 on the same low profile rig (my sig) is:

- faster load times;

- way better stability in display / smoothness;

- way better World scenery, at least in the regions I know from RL and usually fly over IRL;

- better detail at the default airports I usually fly to / from;

 - much more default aircraft even in my Standard version;

- better weather rendering than in the latest versions of FS 2020, post SU7;

- no problems with the integration with Fenix A320, RealTurb, ASFS, BATC and now since yesterday FSHUD too;

The only reason I presently miss FS 2020 is for not being able to use the FSLabs A321 with it, and also the FBW 320 N and their 380 (which I never used because I no longer had FS 2020 installed when it was released), as well as the PMDGs 737, 777, DC-6... 

But I can calmly wait for those.

I have completed a few medium range flights over Europe, with BATC and AI models provided by FSLTL, and so far no quirks, CTDs, stutters or any sort of problems I actually sometimes experienced with FS 2020.

Only things I hope to get better with future updates are: weather effects including that really ridiculous modelling of soaring weather, namely thermals, effects of convective clouds, and some details of the tuning of cloud rendering, and flight dynamics which still feel, most of the time, just as arcadish as the flight dynamics  were in FS 2020 - that's the major problem with MSFS for me - aircraft fly like as if I was playing Mr Mario flightsim 😕

Edited December 25, 20241 yr by jcomm

You can't buy an apple, and then depend on YouTube tutorials to understand the Apple , because you have discovered that the apple was a pear.

Msfs2024 has appeared with an extraordinary advertising of quality and fun, and thousands of users have encountered errors and bugs that do not have to be. It is not lawful to depend on YouTube tutorials for the product to work as expected.

Its not a question of: i like or i dont like. Its a question of:  it works or it doesnt work. 
 

If we can't have separate 2020 and 2024 forums could we at least have a separate 2020/2024 BUG /COMPLAINTS/HELP WANTED thread? 

This way those of us who actually ENJOY our sims can share some positive experiences instead of this endless random 2024 issue carpet bombing situation?