3 hours ago, speedyTC said:

An update every week, more or less. With a LOT of fixes.

Makes one wonder whether they completely skipped in-house testing before release.

I see it very differently. I see dedication. I see passion to get this right. 

After I reinstalled MSFS 24 getting rid of the betas I was able to get a great flight with the A350. Closed MS and came back. Saw there was an update and installed. Immediately noticed a terrible frame rate. Roughly 10.5 fps on the tarmac of NZCH.  Now unflyable. Further my co-pilot is now stuck in the bottom of his seat! lol. Great update there guys. And don't tell me I need to install a beta because you guys caused me to do so with all the misery I had with that beta 2 garbage. Sheesh.

Edited March 29, 20251 yr by lenny777

6 updates in 4 weeks. Makes you think if this was rushed or something. Decent plane nonetheless but can devs please release stable planes at launch. 

2 hours ago, lenny777 said:

After I reinstalled MSFS 24 getting rid of the betas I was able to get a great flight with the A350. Closed MS and came back. Saw there was an update and installed. Immediately noticed a terrible frame rate. Roughly 10.5 fps on the tarmac of NZCH.  Now unflyable. Further my co-pilot is now stuck in the bottom of his seat! lol. Great update there guys. And don't tell me I need to install a beta because you guys caused me to do so with all the misery I had with that beta 2 garbage. Sheesh.

You don't require the SU2 beta for this.

  

3 hours ago, Aviator_2024 said:

Performance is still abysmal. Either it’s not meant to be flyable in 2020 or they don’t know how to optimize planes. 6 patches and almost non existing improvement 

Well it was made originally for 2024, the 2020 one was a late decision.

Edited March 29, 20251 yr by Tuskin38

Still so many systems errors.

6 updates in and can't do a single flight without noticing so much wrong.

Was it rushed for released? Maybe. Does it bother me? Not really. I've been doing many long hauls in this and have only had 1 WASM crash in the earlier versions and every other flight has been fine (I'm in 2020). Performance also doesn't seem to be an issue for myself.

Anyway, I've noticed the MCDU displays seem to be be faster in response on this update (nice).

I'm a fan of the weekly updates that we seem to be getting. Better than waiting months for updates.

Edited March 29, 20251 yr by Zangoose

Excellent news, although I prefer to be out until SU2 final rolls out.

Yesterday I made a clean install of MSFS 2024, then opted for the Beta in xBox Insider Hub and decided to clear my Community.

While in this beta, which I am finding stable, smooth and with some nice surprises I wasn't expecting, like a better "feel of flight" for instance in the default C172, I decided to not add anything to the base sim. Only default aircraft, traffic and ATC.

But I believe by the time Su2 goes final I will probably be ready to install a newer version of the A350, at least at the pace they're releasing updates 🙂

It's a great aircraft - great in all dimensions 🙂

8 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

Thousands of people testing a product will always find bugs a dozen testers wouldn’t.

Thousands of different sim setups, thousands of different addon configurations, it’s possible to test all possible scenarios 

and no they didn’t skip testing.

Flying in a straight line and wasm errors I would of thought was basics.

 

They started promoting it too early then had to release, In my opinion 

4 hours ago, lagos_flyer said:

6 updates in 4 weeks. Makes you think if this was rushed or something. Decent plane nonetheless but can devs please release stable planes at launch. 

They don't need to bother.  People would of bought it even if only had one wing.  Don't blame Devs , blame the consumers.  

4 hours ago, lagos_flyer said:

6 updates in 4 weeks. Makes you think if this was rushed or something. Decent plane nonetheless but can devs please release stable planes at launch. 

Of course it was rushed. The way they excused the lack of complete ECAM messages very much proves that. They said they weren't going to be able to finish that for release and they are working on including more of them later.

That also is reflected in the selectable failures. It's by only a fraction of what can go wrong at this time. Same reason. Simply not done in time for release.

The taxi camera light that worked in version 1.04 is also not working in version 1.06.

I don't know where those of you who say it was a rushed product have been hiding, it's Inibuilds standard to release faulty products and then over time try to half fix them. I learned my lesson with EGLL in 2020 and after that came a lot of products like that, they are called Inibugs for a reason.

I tried another flight this morning and the co-pilot is now sitting down in the galley! lol. Terrible update. And the FPS is garbage. And then to cap it off MSFS froze. Had to task manager out of it.

Edited March 29, 20251 yr by lenny777

I own many, many Inibuilds products. If they were bad as many of you think, I would not continue to buy from them. I don't care if they release 2 update fixes a week, I appreciate any developer listening and trying to improve their product.

23 minutes ago, Bigmack said:

Tengo muchísimos productos de Inibuilds. Si fueran tan malos como muchos creen, no seguiría comprándoles. No me importa si publican dos actualizaciones a la semana; agradezco a cualquier desarrollador que escuche y se esfuerce por mejorar su producto.

If you have so many products you know perfectly well how he has always released them, lots of bugs and very bad performance, I have the feeling that he shares the same QA team as Asobo.