19 hours ago, Noel said:

Hey all, can someone confirm whether or not GSX plays well with this plane? I just bought Phenom 300 and it doesn't and there is no GSX profile for it and GSX does not recognize it currently. Hopefully that will change. I'm a big fan of the Longitude so what are people's sense of how the Sovereign compares generally? Thanks in advance

I believe it does. And while the Phenom doesn't come with one you can easily make your own.

19 hours ago, Noel said:

I'm a big fan of the Longitude so what are people's sense of how the Sovereign compares generally? Thanks in advance

It compares very favorably. Systems wise they seem to be on par. The Sovereign+ is worth it just for the sounds alone. Textures, though, are way better on the Longitude.

9 hours ago, Farlis said:

I believe it does. And while the Phenom doesn't come with one you can easily make your own.

GSX plays well with Sovereign.

Edited Tuesday at 12:54 AM5 days by Noel

On 6/8/2026 at 4:50 PM, Ricardo41 said:

It compares very favorably. Systems wise they seem to be on par. The Sovereign+ is worth it just for the sounds alone. Textures, though, are way better on the Longitude.

If I close my eyes I prefer the Sovereign, internally the textures are very lacklustre, externally they are woeful.

Shame when everything else is so well done .. ..

I haven't picked this one up yet, but this thread has been useful because it shows the kind of details that matter after the first impression video is over.

For a business jet I care less about the headline feature list and more about whether the avionics, VNAV/approach behavior and general IFR workflow feel believable over a normal sector. If those parts are solid, the Sovereign+ becomes much more interesting to me than just another fast default-style jet.

55 minutes ago, Cloud Surfing said:

I haven't picked this one up yet, but this thread has been useful because it shows the kind of details that matter after the first impression video is over.

For a business jet I care less about the headline feature list and more about whether the avionics, VNAV/approach behavior and general IFR workflow feel believable over a normal sector. If those parts are solid, the Sovereign+ becomes much more interesting to me than just another fast default-style jet.

Go for it, take the plunge, you won't regret it. Not sure why folks find the interior and exterior textures not good. I think that their great. I see no issues. I really don't care about cabin window shades and if the toilet flushes. System wise it's very in detailed and in-depth. VNAV approach is on the money; you won't be disappointed.

I was one of those who commented on the textures before buying it and honestly, it's no better or worse than the Longitude which really isn't stellar either. If you walk around outside and look very closely, yes, it's not great but from inside the cockpit it is comparable to the Phenom and the Honda Jet and you really don't notice after about 10 seconds. It would be nice if it was improved but I was expecting much, much worse and it doesn't impact negatively on 'being there' when flying it at all.

I installed 680+ just a few days ago, and it is quite nice, however I was wondering if anyone here is using

Logitech Flight Panels eg Multipanel and found they are not working, I load another plane and all panels works as always

then I switch to the 680+ and the Panels go blank, I posted on their Discord but no answer yet. Have the latest drivers.

Maybe someone in here has a solution?

Thanks

First full flight in the Sovereign+ completed. Textures on the inside are great, subtle and not as dirty and aged as I think a lot of us have come to expect. If the Fenix A320 has the best cockpit texturing that I have seen to date, the Sovereign+ comes in at the same level as Black Square. I've attached a couple of screenshots for people on the fence, like I was.

The Sovereign+ is very well made, from what I can tell on this first flight, feels heavy and, perhaps more importantly, I didn't have 1 electrical disconnection ruining the flight, unlike the disconnects I get every flight in the Phenom.

Climb rates of +/- 6000 fpm require careful management but having an autothrottle is a huge help in the Sovereign+. Personally, I don't care for toilet water simulation or cabin details, I fly from the cockpit, and the Sovereign+ gets a 9/10 on systems depth, offering integrated ACARS / CPDLC systems for ATIS and clearance that works with SI, and, like the A2A Comanche, it actually feels like you're in a real cockpit and flying an aircraft through moving air, as much as it can in MSFS. I have limited real world experience flying small GA for comparison, but the Sovereign+ has that something special that I suspect lot of us are looking for and is a fantastic modern glass alternative to the FlightFX CitationX. Fly safe.

Edited Friday at 01:00 PM1 day by toby23

Great pics.

Honestly I think the textures in the cockpit are great. I don't understand the complaints. the only poor textures I've seen are on some of the default liveries (really nasty jagged stripes). I don't tend to worry too much about external models and textures though, as I'm an 'indoors' type of guy.

4 hours ago, toby23 said:

First full flight in the Sovereign+ completed. Textures on the inside are great, subtle and not as dirty and aged as I think a lot of us have come to expect. If the Fenix A320 has the best cockpit texturing that I have seen to date, the Sovereign+ comes in at the same level as Black Square. I've attached a couple of screenshots for people on the fence, like I was.

The Sovereign+ is very well made, from what I can tell on this first flight, feels heavy and, perhaps more importantly, I didn't have 1 electrical disconnection ruining the flight, unlike the disconnects I get every flight in the Phenom.

Climb rates of +/- 6000 fpm require careful management but having an autothrottle is a huge help in the Sovereign+. Personally, I don't care for toilet water simulation or cabin details, I fly from the cockpit, and the Sovereign+ gets a 9/10 on systems depth, offering integrated ACARS / CPDLC systems for ATIS and clearance that works with SI, and, like the A2A Comanche, it actually feels like you're in a real cockpit and flying an aircraft through moving air, as much as it can in MSFS. I have limited real world experience flying small GA for comparison, but the Sovereign+ has that something special that I suspect lot of us are looking for and is a fantastic modern glass alternative to the FlightFX CitationX. Fly safe.
I am type rated in this jet and have flown the Latitude (same type) for a job... it's really great and the sounds are spot on.... for once!!

I have done many videos on this on my youtube channel featuring this jet... I am typed on the 680 and love this product. Avsim doesn't like me to post any youtube links, perhaps they are banning everyone now for posting any youtube content, no matter how relavant