January 22, 20179 yr i say its a much more robust maintainance system FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
January 22, 20179 yr Author Perhaps refer to the flightsimcon 2015 video when PMDG presented. Perhaps that holds some clues. link please or it didn't happen Brian Nellis
January 22, 20179 yr None of you are even close. Entertaining reading, however. Me and Cookie Monster thought this was "Oreo" Project. I guess we'll just have to settle for a DC-3 with Wright Cyclones. :smile: blaustern and Cookie Monster I Earned My Spurs in Vietnam
January 22, 20179 yr An-124? I'm pretty sure it has oleo struts. Then again, that seems pretty hard to find data for lol. Philip LaBianca _____________________ "I think, therefore I am."
January 22, 20179 yr Commercial Member Interesting choice for a name. The names we're using internally are very different. ...but they're all so secret that I took a page from the old Lockheed Martin Skunkworks book and made my own division up (see the sig). Can't wait for you all to officially hear about what all of it is about. :smile: Kyle Rodgers
January 22, 20179 yr Can't wait for you all to officially hear about what all of it is about. So do we, Kyle Fabrizio Barbierato
January 22, 20179 yr Can't wait for you all to officially hear about what all of it is about. Do you have any kind of ETA for when we'll get to know? Days, weeks, months, years? Not asking something too specific, just a ballpark!
January 22, 20179 yr Interesting choice for a name. The names we're using internally are very different. ...but they're all so secret that I took a page from the old Lockheed Martin Skunkworks book and made my own division up (see the sig). Can't wait for you all to officially hear about what all of it is about. :smile: "...skunkworks...", hmmm... that wouldn't be a hint, would it? :Praying:
January 22, 20179 yr Whatever it is, it's clearly some kind of tool or function rather than a specific aircraft. That said, just to add to the usual clamour for aircraft types, a PMDG 747-200 - with a flight engineer like the DC6 has to look after all the stuff back there - would rock my world. Dreamliner would be lovely too. A
January 22, 20179 yr Whatever it is, it's clearly some kind of tool or function rather than a specific aircraft. That said, just to add to the usual clamour for aircraft types, a PMDG 747-200 - with a flight engineer like the DC6 has to look after all the stuff back there - would rock my world. Dreamliner would be lovely too. Yeah, definitely the 747 classic models would be awesome. regards: Tom McNamara New Zealand
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.