Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dolbinau

Is there a 'flagship' MSFS 2020 default aircraft?

Recommended Posts

Is there an aircraft that is the most realistic, most visually appealing etc.. that stands out above the rest? E.g. the TBM? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both the 152 and the 172 seem very sound to me, for default aircraft. 

  • Like 3

Dan Scott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, dolbinau said:

Is there an aircraft that is the most realistic, most visually appealing etc.. that stands out above the rest? E.g. the TBM? 

Not the TBM or any of the turboprops until turboprop modeling improves, and that may need 3rd party payware. 

I'd say the 152 and 172 for now.


X-Plane and Microsoft Flight Simulator on Windows 10 
i7 6700 4.0 GHz, 32 GB RAM, GTX 1660 ti, 1920x1200 monitor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

C172, C152, DA40, TBM!


ASUS ROG Maximus Hero XII ▪︎ Intel i9-10900K ▪︎ NVIDIA RTX 3090 FE ▪︎ 64GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro ▪︎ Windows 10 Pro (21H1) ▪︎ Samsung 970 EVO Pro 1TB NVME SSD (OS Drive) ▪︎ Samsung 860 EVO 2TB SATA SSD ▪︎ Seagate 4TB SATA HDD ▪︎ Corsair RMx 850W PSU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From an older development update.

Quote

We added the full source for the DA62 aircraft as a more complex example that third party developers can inspect and learn from.

Perhaps this is the aircraft that Asobo would consider as the simulator's flagship.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, ironically considering the package contains the 747-8 and 787 it’s the little 152 and 172 that steal the show for seasoned simmers 

  • Like 3

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

152, 172 Steam version and 172 G1000

Edited by Nyxx

David Murden  MSFS   Fenix A320  PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi •  FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet 

 Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF   Flightsim.to •

DCS  A10c II  F-16c  F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier  Terrains = • Nevada NTTR  Persian Gulf  Syria • Marianas • 

• 10900K@4.9 All Cores HT ON   32GB DDR4  3200MHz RTX 3080  • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos®  Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, C152, 172 and I'd throw in the 182 just for giggles.

I've honestly flown more in the 152 in this iteration. The 172 has a weird look left, where its angled down instead of seeing the bottom of the wing.

Edited by Lotharen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

172 , over all pretty nice. Although not being able to open the doors is a let down,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite my screen name I've been spending most of my time VFR in the steam gauge 172 and the SR22.   They seem to be the most polished aircraft and the most fun to fly.  I wonder if this is because there are more 172 and SR22 pilots out there than for the other aircraft?  The Zin Shock Ultra is also a lot of fun for up close sightseeing but is very bare bones feature wise.    Note for new simmers: It's very important to manually trim the pitch on all of these after takeoff for a good flying experience.

A few random notes:

- The classic 172 panel looks shockingly beautiful at night, like "I can't believe this is just a simulator" (I"m using a 40" Samsung 4k tv about 2 feet in front of me).

- The SR22 cockpit is also nicely done, with standby gauges having the same realism as the classic 172 panel.  Sometimes I have been able to get Nexrad radar on the secondary display which is nice.  The engine sound on the SR22 is probably the most realistic of all the aircraft.  

- For long-haul IFR flights The 747-8 is my favorite once I figured out workarounds for the many autopilot bugs (posted on the tips and tricks section).   Certainly not a flagship with the current problems but I'm really impressed with all of the cockpit lighting controls in the 747.  For best effect turn off all of the flood/dome/panel/map floodlights, and dial down all of the LCD and instrument panel backlights to just a few clicks above minimum.  Look carefully, there are a LOT of cockpit lighting dials and most of them have two separate controls nested in one.  The 747 definitely needs new engine sounds however.   No rumble, no roar behind the engines, no buzzsaw (at appropriate speeds) in front or in the cockpit.

- All aircraft need better wind noise, but especially the fast airliners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Cognita said:

Both the 152 and the 172 seem very sound to me, for default aircraft. 

They have their fair share of issues too though. Hopefully they get ironed out.

For the 172, fuel flow is messed up, mixture passes full rich and then begins to lower fuel flow as you increase the axis, amp meter shows discharge and charge flipped, engine starts flawlessly every time for some reason, and fuel cutoff defaults to off and mixture defaults to full rich in the cold and dark setting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...