I can't tell any difference, except it froze a couple of times when I tried to exit the game, I honestly dont know why they bother with this constant update obsession, my best experience was about 3 updates in as far as as I can remember

Edited April 27, 20224 yr by Pathfinder633

18 minutes ago, Pathfinder633 said:

I can't tell any difference, except it froze a couple of times when I tried to exit the game, I honestly dont know why they bother with this constant update obsession, my best experience was about 3 updates in as far as as I can remember

They are obsessed with monthly updates, but it has not hit their brain just yet that the ATC voices are worse today than they were yesterday morning. The live weather depiction still doesn't work, AI traffic is still a mess. There are hundred of important bridges that need to be updated & cars still float above the roads.

The list of fixes each month is extensive, yet a year in a half has passed and the sim is not as good as it was when it initially released. Still customers believe in the 10 year experiment and are willing to spend $80 on new airplanes & $25 on enhanced airports. Some airports that should be included with their 10 year plan. Why, because it's what their customers expect.

For those who think that I'm making a big deal, I bought (paid) for many airports in Spain, and the last WU had a negative effect on some of these add-ons. They are still not fixed yet. That's taking a step back IMO.

I don't make stuff up, I just state the facts.

I think since the turn of the year, their main priority has been to get the sim into a state where the aircraft we are starting to see being released. But i agree, they need to rid the sim of some of these long standing issues, after all was it not the original plan for the firsr few months of this year to do just that.

10 minutes ago, DJJose said:

but it has not hit their brain just yet that the ATC voices are worse today than they were yesterday morning

Yeah I noticed that last night, was weird.

Yep and what happens when an addon Dev has had enough updating his product because ASOBO broke it again in update?, we end up with something we paid for not working, yea its just a game and a few dollars wasted is just a first world problem, but its a valid point to discuss

On my side, FPS seems way stable than before with a gain of 2-3fps. I tried default, improved default, freeware and payware.

The only exception is LFQQ from BEAUTIFUL MODEL of the WORLD, where performance is worst than SU8, which was always an issue for me, from 18 to 15fps, on the other airports I tried from the same dev, I get a steady 27-35fps

10 minutes ago, Pathfinder633 said:

Yep and what happens when an addon Dev has had enough updating his product because ASOBO broke it again in update?, we end up with something we paid for not working, yea its just a game and a few dollars wasted is just a first world problem, but its a valid point to discuss

All depends on how much profit you make out of it. If you have to fix things once a month for let‘s say 30 man-hours, but your scenery/aircraft sells way better than on X-Plane or P3D, you still make more profit on MSFS. So the actual important thing is: Will the customers jump the train down the road? That‘s where Asobo (and anyone else) has to put his worries into, because less customers = less sales = less profit = less interest in constantly fixing stuff due to SU/WUs. If things go really wrong, this can lead to a chain reaction. Maybe not tomorrow, but down the road in 1 or 2 years if MSFS is still a big construction site and xplane 12 is going well, this could happen. So Asobo is doing well in limiting their SUs so they don‘t wreck the whole sim, I think. Even if that means less progress

Fiorentoni, Totally agree with follow the money aspect but as for:

"So Asobo is doing well in limiting their SUs so they don‘t wreck the whole sim, I think. Even if that means less progress"
Huh, was that in reply to my post? as I was making the point that they do too many

Don't listen to them, Asobo! Kepp the updates coming.

56 minutes ago, bendead said:

On my side, FPS seems way stable than before with a gain of 2-3fps. I tried default, improved default, freeware and payware.

The only exception is LFQQ from BEAUTIFUL MODEL of the WORLD, where performance is worst than SU8, which was always an issue for me, from 18 to 15fps, on the other airports I tried from the same dev, I get a steady 27-35fps

You're right, BMW's LFQQ really hammers the main thread. I suspect it's because it's within the photogrammetry area of the city of Lille...

1 hour ago, DJJose said:

the ATC voices are worse today than they were yesterday morning.

I liked the new voices better.

Just now, Ixoye said:

I liked the new voices better.

They sound more like the default voice that engaged every time AZURE voices stopped working.

It was like listening to children playing at the school yard.

1 minute ago, DJJose said:

They sound more like the default voice that engaged every time AZURE voices stopped working.

It was like listening to children playing at the school yard.

Definitely...

34 minutes ago, rayharris108 said:

You're right, BMW's LFQQ really hammers the main thread. I suspect it's because it's within the photogrammetry area of the city of Lille...

I will try without photogrammetry, and report back

My sims running good again no issues here flying Developmental FBW NEO.