Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Are there any default planes that are 100% working properly?

Featured Replies

I bought the basic package. From previous experience I had suspected that many of the default aircraft would be pants. And I was correct.

The Cirrus flies nicely and appears to have correct V/Stall speeds but still has some minor bugs.

The Cessna 172 also works much like the real one and the handling is "OK" for a flight simulator game.

I also liked flying the DHC-6 (?). Great STOL performance with reverse prop! 

Other than that I think many of the others have unusual handling responses and/or other bugs.

I do like the freeware Cessna 152 available for MS2024 - that is very good but obviously not a "default" aircraft.

Hopefully at some point there will payware aircraft modelled using the MS2024 architecture rather than just being "port-overs" from a previous version of MSFS.

 

 

Chillblast Core i5 14600KF Liquid Cooled RTX 4070 SUPER 32GB RAM. Internet: 1 Gig Fibre. HoneyComb Throttle & Flight System.

UK PPL since 2006 current on PA-28, C-152, C172, Decathlon, C-42 based at EGHP.

  • Replies 30
  • Views 6.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • I really don't know, but I can name those I've been extensively using and enjoying: Inibuilds: - A320N, A321N, A330, A400 Not being to the level of the best payware addons they're still

  • And herein lies the 'insult to injury' that the Deluxe and Premium Deluxe editions represent: "pay us more for even MORE broken/incomplete aircraft!" That being said, opinion seems to be that amo

  • True, but there are planes that pretty much allow you to complete a flight from A to B 1. Cessna Citation Longitude 2. Asobo Cirrus Vision Jet 3. Pilatus PC-24 - VSpeeds are all wrong, don't

3 hours ago, sloppysmusic said:

"Mission Accomplished!" 

Cue the high 5s from the dev workshop 😎👍

Have you tried any of the three planes I mentioned?

I find the Caravan to be quite decent.

I flew the 787 for the first time in a few months, and all it really reinforced for me is that we need a real 787.

53 minutes ago, mspencer said:

I flew the 787 for the first time in a few months, and all it really reinforced for me is that we need a real 787.

Yes, there’s some nice bits to it and some pretty awful stuff too sadly that detract from the whole simulation.

The autopilot is continually rolling left and right slightly , and the pitch angles for climb are off the scale.

5 years in now and still no hi fidelity 787, meanwhile more variants of Airbus available than you can shake a stick at.

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

6 hours ago, MarcG said:

Indeed. 

It would also be incredibly ironic if the four "Make Good" planes come riddled with issues & bugs, wouldn't actually surprise me if they did.

Oh that will ABSOLUTELY be the case, without question. It's all so ridiculous.  

I find the 2020 default planes to be better than the 2024 versions.. It is as if they did a quick update with LOD changes to reduce the memory footprint, and in the process introduced various bugs and visual imperfections.

I have now copied over most of the 2020 default airplanes that I fly, or rely on for Blacksquare panel mods, to my new 2024  "Official2020" folder.  This way I can select them in 2024 and they are as good as ever.

The only airplanes this does not work for, are the ones with encrypted content, like the Baron..

Bert

43 minutes ago, jon b said:

Yes, there’s some nice bits to it and some pretty awful stuff too sadly that detract from the whole simulation.

The autopilot is continually rolling left and right slightly , and the pitch angles for climb are off the scale.

5 years in now and still no hi fidelity 787, meanwhile more variants of Airbus available than you can shake a stick at.

Yeah it was some of the wacky autopilot behavior that got me. Also once I got it to cruise, couldn't get it to enter anything except VNAV ALT - refused to step climb, refused to follow a VNAV PATH on the descent as well. More annoying than anything else.

21 hours ago, VeryBumpy said:

 

Are there any default planes that are 100% working properly??? Besides the 172 (even though I never use so maybe it does have issues too?).

Seems every plane I try has an issue or 5.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

spacer.png

 

 

5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB  PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.

 

2 minutes ago, Fielder said:

Are there any default planes that are 100% working properly??? Besides the 172 (even though I never use so maybe it does have issues too?).

Seems every plane I try has an issue or 5.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

spacer.png

 

 

What issue did you run across with the Cessna Citation Longitude and/ or the Asobo Cirrus Vision Jet?

Edited by Ricardo41

I have never flown either.

5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB  PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.

 

This MSFS2024 Simulator is a nothing other than a joke !!!

cheers 😉

08.2024 new PC is online :  ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Mainboard,  AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D Prozessor, G.Skill DIMM 64 GB DDR5-6000 (2x 32 GB) Dual-Kit, MSI GeForce RTX 4090 VENTUS 3X E 24G OC Grafikkarte, 2x WD Black SN850X NVMe SSD 4 TB - Drive C+D, WD Gold Enterprise Class 12 TB for storage  HDD, Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1000W PC - Power supply, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Aircooler with 7 Heatpipes, Design Meshify 2 White TG Clear Tint Tower-Case, 3x 4K monitors 2x32 Samsung 1x27 LG  3840x2160, Windows11 Prof. 23H2 - now Windows11 Prof. 25H2

Flightsimulator Hardware: Honeycomb Throttle Bravo, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro, Logitech Flight Joke System, XBox Controller, some Thrustmaster stuff, Winwing CDU Panels.

spacer.pngspacer.png

may I add the C404 to the list = flew lots in R/L - it flys nicely but it's supposed to be turbo charged - but never pulls anywhere near max manifold pressure - also the 2nd obs indicator doesn't work (I love hand flying ILS approaches) - also the altimiter sometimes works othere wise sticks on zero & at night you can't dim the GNS.

Now also don't get me started on the MU2

Rattso

Cooler Master Cosmos 700M - MSI Godlike X (Devillike!!) - AMDD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (water cooled) - 128gb Corsair Vengeance 5200 D5 - ASUS ROG Astral GeForce RTX 5090 Liquid OC GDDR7 32GB - EVGA 2000W P/S - Creative AE-7 - intel Optane 500gb - 3x 2tb M2 SSDs - 2x 2tb Samsung EVO SSDs - 1x Hybrid 2tb HDD - Brunner CLS-63E Joystick - Honeycombe Bravo quadrant -  Brunner CLS-B rudder pedals - Samsung Odessey Ark 55" - G9 49" monitor

On 2/11/2025 at 4:46 AM, TrafficPilot said:

I bought the basic package. From previous experience I had suspected that many of the default aircraft would be pants. And I was correct.

The Cirrus flies nicely and appears to have correct V/Stall speeds but still has some minor bugs.

The Cessna 172 also works much like the real one and the handling is "OK" for a flight simulator game.

I also liked flying the DHC-6 (?). Great STOL performance with reverse prop! 

Other than that I think many of the others have unusual handling responses and/or other bugs.

I do like the freeware Cessna 152 available for MS2024 - that is very good but obviously not a "default" aircraft.

Hopefully at some point there will payware aircraft modelled using the MS2024 architecture rather than just being "port-overs" from a previous version of MSFS.

 

 

If you're into GA, then get either the A2A Comanche or the FSR500.

A2A, as always, has its own "architecture", and the FSR500 remains an outstanding addon.

I haven't yet upgraded from the Compatible version, but the reviews on the iB A300 Premium are rather good - especially given that it was such a solid model in v20.

I will give you a hint, though: 

Every addon will use code from the previous version. It's simply how the software dev world works.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.