PMDG 737 NGX: PMDG's attitude toward realism

[Guest wims]

I can't seem to view the images on page 6 I get an error #10173Thanks,Josh Katz

http://www.flyaoamedia.com/blog/737/737ngx-virtual-cockpit-screenshot/

[AVIASIMER]

Helo Have the new PMDG NGX a Windsheare Warning System ??? you can see it on this video

Andi

[fsgeek]

Helo Have the new PMDG NGX a Windsheare Warning System ??? you can see it on this video

Andi

If you take a look at the first picture of this thread you'll notice the symbol PWS on the navigation display. This stands for Predictive Windshear System and I believe either Ryan or Vin mentioned that there would be a call-out as well :DRegards

[Scope]

Dear PMDG,When you make 2D-panels, pleeease make them in widescreen and in highresolution, like for example seen in the new ifly 737. It works simply great and looks stunning.Thanks for making this product - really looking forward to it.

[akzach]

Well there seems to be a discrepancy with the configuration on the lower levels of developing a design that will functionally serve the needs required by a select few of us users. That is, to say, that the origins of development are pre-existing on a far inferior level, or what we would assume is negligent. Please re-think your values, so that we may better adhere to the new principles of user compatibility.zach barnacle.

[vscimone]

Well there seems to be a discrepancy with the configuration on the lower levels of developing a design that will functionally serve the needs required by a select few of us users. That is, to say, that the origins of development are pre-existing on a far inferior level, or what we would assume is negligent. Please re-think your values, so that we may better adhere to the new principles of user compatibility.zach barnacle.

yeah.. um, ok. We'll get together and meditate on this...

[NoahBryant]

Well there seems to be a discrepancy with the configuration on the lower levels of developing a design that will functionally serve the needs required by a select few of us users. That is, to say, that the origins of development are pre-existing on a far inferior level, or what we would assume is negligent. Please re-think your values, so that we may better adhere to the new principles of user compatibility.zach barnacle.

Huh???If you're syaing PMDG needs to stop working so hard to obtain a perfect simulation in all regards the I'm happy to tell you your needs have alreay been met...by every other developer.

[windshearDK]

Huh???If you're syaing PMDG needs to stop working so hard to obtain a perfect simulation in all regards the I'm happy to tell you your needs have alreay been met...by every other developer.

I didn't understand nothing of this either... Couldn't mean he dislikes complexity, why would he be messing with a simulator anyways??I think there are some trolls messing about, who wants to dishearten the talented crew of PMDG. Seems only now that realism is finally revealed, that they come out of their caves.I don't know how to ignore this though, I think it's beyond unfair and impolite, it's malevolent that's what it is

[3-2-1-Now]

yeah.. um, ok. We'll get together and meditate on this...

hahaha!!Doesn't make any sense here, either.Best regards,Robin.

[WestAir]

Guys,He was just poking fun / joking around. Though his total point was probably "Include a full 2D Panel". I wouldn't take it too seriously, he was still (probably) just yanking your chain. :(

[Cras]

What ever the intent of that cryptic post was, what I know is this:PMDG (lead by their fearless leader) has set out to make the most realistic representation of the Boeing 737 NG as possible in FSX. And I have no problem with this.

[WestAir]

What ever the intent of that cryptic post was, what I know is this:PMDG (lead by their fearless leader) has set out to make the most realistic representation of the Boeing 737 NG as possible in FSX. And I have no problem with this.

Agreed. I don't believe any aircraft or product for Flight Sim has ever had this much attention or hype. Yet somehow, I get the feeling PMDG will somehow exceed our already incredible expectations.

[Qatsimo]

Look at this guy for example: airliners.net/photo/Virgin-Blue-Airlines/Boeing-737-8FE/1714367/L (I know I can't link but copy'n'paste should do the trick).Comparing those two clearly reveals there are some more problems with FSX lighting. I truely hope MSFlight or whatever it will be will get a major improvement in lighting engine. I am aware of the fact I am comparing a photo (with just one unique lighting condition) to some FSX shot but still.

Thats FSX lighting limitation. Nothing can stop the light, everything is transparent. For that reason i dislike flying at dawn or dusk. Because with the sun from behind the panel lights up as if it's sun bathing.

[ryanbatc]

Well there seems to be a discrepancy with the configuration on the lower levels of developing a design that will functionally serve the needs required by a select few of us users. That is, to say, that the origins of development are pre-existing on a far inferior level, or what we would assume is negligent. Please re-think your values, so that we may better adhere to the new principles of user compatibility.

This makes zero sense.

[Jeff_B]

Dear PMDG,When you make 2D-panels, pleeease make them in widescreen and in highresolution, like for example seen in the new ifly 737. It works simply great and looks stunning.Thanks for making this product - really looking forward to it.

+1. I find it awkward to use VC mode i dont find it that user friendly. I hope so much that have full 2D panels as the MD11 they are brilliant,clear easy to use.