Sign in to follow this  
N1G

Poll - Happy with 2.4? 1 for YES, 0 for NO

Recommended Posts

Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

           000000

     0000       00

00000          00

     000         00

     000         00

     000         00

     000         00

00000000000000

00000000000000

Share this post


Link to post

           000000

     0000       00

00000          00

     000         00

     000         00

     000         00

     000         00

00000000000000

00000000000000

 

 

+1 = :P

 

Yes I am, but there is still things that need fixing, and improvements that can be made. As LM have been so proactive, up till now, there is an expectation we shall reach some sort of nirvana. With FSX we made do in the knowledge things would never change... if all development stopped now I could barely wish for a better platform.

.

Share this post


Link to post

1

 

This time I waited until my third party add-ons had been updated (ASN and Orbx), and my install went without a hitch (thanks to Rob's excellent guide) ... and I've ONLY run all the patches (version 2.0 has been my only full install).

 

I think some users were/are expecting too much. This update was the first that didn't make any obvious changes/additions, but was focused on fixing v.2.3's bugs. I'm very happy with the progress so far with v.2.x.

Share this post


Link to post

Resounding 1, but (there is always a but), it would be nice to see a concrete "roadmap" towards the resolution of long-in-the-tooth problems with this platform that afflict some if not all simmers using this platform:

  • The micro/0.5 second/[insert your neologism here]-stutters
  • Blurries
  • The dramatic loss of performance in the notorious black holes of the sim, namely the Seattle area, London, Milan (and potentially others)
  • As of recently, an issue with aircraft carrier lights, and wake effect (I appreciate this is a niche request)

These issues would be really great to resolve, and it would be great to see Lockheed Martin devote attention to these issues over and above eye-candy items that are usually found in their request list, like sloping runways, etc. But then again my interests/priorities as a simmer are probably different from their commercial goals/imperatives/etc.

 

Just my unsolicited 2 cents/pennies.

Share this post


Link to post

1: a solid minor release. No big changes, but several smaller improvements, and no regressions discovered so far.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this