Can these be used for the latest Pro/ATC-X?

http://realatc.net/RealATCforPRO-ATCX.htm

I bought the program yesterday and really like it. I like better than PF3 that I also own.

Can these be used for the latest Pro/ATC-X?

http://realatc.net/RealATCforPRO-ATCX.htm

I bought the program yesterday and really like it. I like better than PF3 that I also own.

 

All files fully tested with the new release of PRO-ATC/C  V 1.8.5 released on 9 October 2016.

Can these be used for the latest Pro/ATC-X?

http://realatc.net/RealATCforPRO-ATCX.htm

I bought the program yesterday and really like it. I like better than PF3 that I also own.

 

 

Could someone, please do a video showing off these add-on voices for Pro-ATC/X? Would like to here a sample before buying.

All files fully tested with the new release of PRO-ATC/C  V 1.8.5 released on 9 October 2016.

Thank you. I think I'll pick them up.

Could someone, please do a video showing off these add-on voices for Pro-ATC/X? Would like to here a sample before buying.

What you hear on the Realatc voices is what you hear on LiveATC web site. No need for a video. Just go to Liveatc web site.

Has anybody flown a VFR flight with the new version..??

 

Be interested to know if it works..

 

Dave

Does Pro ATC X supports "Special" visual approaches such as Expressway visual for RWY 31 at LGA? I dont own it, but it sounds interesting product as there are times on VATSIM that you fly totaly alone..

 

 

Could someone, please do a video showing off these add-on voices for Pro-ATC/X? Would like to here a sample before buying.

 

These are extra background ATC chatter files that provide some extra ambiance, they are not add on voice packs.

The extra pilot and controller voices are available at:

http://mavecreations.weebly.com/voices-for-proatcx.html

Always a problem to import flightplan with Nat wp

Why pfpx is able to créate a fp with nat tracks and patcx is still not able to te read or use nat

Can PROATC X use NATs? I use FSCommander to plot my flight plans accross the Atlantic using NATRacks. I'd like to hope PRO ATC can ready those flight plans?

Can PROATC X use NATs? I use FSCommander to plot my flight plans accross the Atlantic using NATRacks. I'd like to hope PRO ATC can ready those flight plans?

 

I did not see NATs in the manual.

Always a problem to import flightplan with Nat wp

Why pfpx is able to créate a fp with nat tracks and patcx is still not able to te read or use nat

 

it seems to import NATs fine for me, just pln file straight from pfpx, maybe you could post your issue at their support forum.

 

Can PROATC X use NATs? I use FSCommander to plot my flight plans accross the Atlantic using NATRacks. I'd like to hope PRO ATC can ready those flight plans?

 

it just reads normal .pln files so it's the same as reading any other plan.

 

i don't believe that it has nat-specific phraseology or handling though, it just treats it like a regular flight. 

 

in this case for example MALOT-NICSO is NATF. 

 

 

cheers

-andy crosby

So far I am not too happy with the new version. What I do love is that you can load a company route by entering the ICAO codes but for now that's all I like. What I absolutely hate is that ATC first ONLY gives you the STAR and later on, and often too late, the runway and transition. Since I can't enter the STAR into the MCDU of my Airbus before I enter the runway, I either have to find the info myself using the menu (which defeats the whole idea of the addon imho) or I have to make a note of the STAR and wait until approach tells me the runway and if it doesn't do so too late I can enter it into the MCDU. Why the heck can't it tell mey everything at once at an appropriate time? Is this more realistic? I also had some odd requests to change the heading while I was flying perfectly as planned. I obviously ignored the request and flew on and ATC didn't bug me about it.

 

Besides the above: the scrolling text isn't anymore what ATC is actually saying, like it was in the previous version. The text on screen often shows a lot more (=too much) information or even different information. And so far descends either were too late or too soon.

 

The previous version worked perfectly fine for me and so apart from the ICAO company route it only seemed to have made things worse.

 

 

Has anybody flown a VFR flight with the new version..??

 

I doubt it as ProATC is IFR only

Since I can't enter the STAR into the MCDU of my Airbus before I enter the runway

 

I think you can, you just need to just the "sideways menu buttons". In Europe this is even easier as STARs are runway heading specific. From the SID name, you can already know which runway you will land on (or one of the parallel runways).

 

 

 

Why the heck can't it tell mey everything at once at an appropriate time? Is this more realistic?

 

Short answer: yes.

 

Long answer: This change was one of the most requested features. In the old version, you were transfered over to approach sometimes over 120nm away from the airport. This wasn't realistic as center should be the one giving you arrival info, not approach. Now the center and approach also give you "expect arrival..." and "expect approach..." info verbally before clearing you to fly the said arrival/approach. Just so that you have more time to enter this into your system.

 

FWIW Here's what I do with the Airbus:

 

1) You enter the route into the aircraft's system without SIDs/STARs

 

2) You the go to the SEC-PLN (secondary flight plan) and then choose copy active. In the aircraft you now have a backup of the "clean route" if you ever need to come back to it.

 

3) I then go back to the FPL page and get my departure clearance. After the clearance I enter the SID data into the FPL (that is still missing STAR and approach info).

 

4) When I'm getting close to the destination airport (around 40nm from aircraft's TOD) I check the destination weather. If the weather still favors same runway as in my OFP (generated by PFPX) I enter the STAR in my plan into the aircraft. I also enter the approach that I would like to fly from the STAR. (Some pilots prefer to set this info before takeoff).

 

5) If ATC gives my something different, then I can activate my secondary flight plan that didn't have any STAR/approach info. This way I can enter new data quickly (without having Aerosoft's A320 crash when you change the STAR and/or approach in the active flight plan)

 

Like you mentioned, in step 4, you can "cheat" by looking at the ProATC flight plan info window that has the STAR & Approach that you can expect. I personally do not consider this as cheating as your company/dispatch would have good info on what runways have been favoured and you could also ask real world ATC what arrival/approach I can expect (they might not happy if they are busy, but you can alway ask).

 

 

 

he scrolling text isn't anymore what ATC is actually saying, like it was in the previous version.

 

The update might have messed up your settings somehow. Please check under options that this feature is still enabled. You can see the "correct" setting here in my video (link goes to point where I show my settings): https://youtu.be/2GtYTNoHkt0?t=1m57s

 

If you click the shortcuts in the video description, you can jump to different phase of the flight and you can see that the text is still present with the new version. 

 

 

 

And so far descends either were too late or too soon.

 

The descents, in my case, are between 10-20 before the Airbus's TOD. Just remember that not setting the arrival and approach data has a huge effect on your TOD. This is why having a PFPX flight plan (for example) helps as it has calculated a good TOD point that you can use for planning.

 

If you open the follwoing link (the same video as before, different postiion), you can see how the TOD moves forward when I program in the arrival and approach (for this flight, it was only 10-20nm, but some cases it can be much more): https://youtu.be/2GtYTNoHkt0?t=1h6m58s