Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Guest

i9 7900X vs. i7 5960X - P3D V4 performance results 85% FPS increase

Recommended Posts

Guest

I must admit these results seem almost to good to be true, but I double checked and verified -- perhaps there was something wrong with my P3D V4 installation on my 5960X but my test flight was visually identical on both systems.

Graphics configuration files and scenario file is here.

Add-ons used:

Orbx FTX Global
Orbx Freeware EU Airports
Orbx OpenLC EU
Orbx OpenLC NA
Orbx Trees
FSUIPC5
Aircraft is the default A36
Location EGFF - RWY 12 loop (Left Hand Pattern)

There were other add-ons installed but not being used, ASP4/ASCA, FSDT GSX, FSFX Packages, UTLive (set to 0 AI), RAAS Pro 64bit (disabled for aircraft)

5960X fraps data (raw csv data) avg. 28 FPS

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwycUFhdlBtbFl1Ykk

7900X fraps data (raw csv data) avg. 52 FPS

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyTFE2ZmJNS1lyMkk

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Guest

Graphics settings

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyTzlqMUZKcVBLZ1E

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyLVNzU3lXU0VXSm8

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyLW5wRlFvak5tYjg

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyd0FGejduUUJwTG8

uc?id=0Bw0Q-fAfEZwyek0tOEdIUTNIemc

Cheers, Rob.

EDIT: In both test cases, TEXTURE_SIZE_EXP=10 was used.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post

Thanks for posting.

Impressive improvement. It won't be long before I update my hardware. Nice to see the new Intel offerings are doing the job.

I don't see what graphics card you are using...I'm guessing a nvida 10xx?


Richard Chafey

 

i7-8700K @4.8GHz - 32Gb @3200  - ASUS ROG Maximus X Hero - EVGA RTX3090 - 3840x2160 Res - KBSim Gunfighter - Thrustmaster Warthog dual throttles - Crosswind V3 pedals

MSFS 2020, P3D 5.1, DCS

 

Share this post


Link to post

Might be related to the architecture update? I mean, the 5960X is based on the Haswell architecture and the 7900X is based on the newer Skylake Architecture?


Greetings, Chris

Intel i7-8700K@5.0GHz, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, Gigabyte AORUS 1080Ti, Windows 10 Home 64bit, Prepar3D 4.5

Share this post


Link to post

Holy Toledo.... Somebody had fun!


Benjamin Nash

P3D v5 - Asus x79-Deluxe, Corei7 4960X @4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3 1600, Nvidia GTX Titian X (Maxwell)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
15 minutes ago, RichieFly said:

I'm guessing a nvida 10xx?

Yes, nVidia Titan X (pascal).

Cheers, Rob.

Share this post


Link to post

This really sounds to good to be true Rob.

Only if you delete your 5960 P3D setup and reinstall it all you will know for sure..


Gerard

7940x ( 14 cores ) : 14 cores @ 4.7 - Gigabyte X299 Gaming 7 - 32 Gb G.Skill Trident Z 3200Mhz Cl 14 - Inno3D RTX3090 X4 iCHILL 24 Gb - 1x SSD M2 1800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Thermaltake Level 10 GT case - EKWB Extreme 240 liquid cooling set push/pull - 2x 43” Sony 4K tv's in NVSurround

8700K : all 6 cores @ 5.0 GHz - Asus ROG 370 - 16 Gb 4000 MHz @ 3600 Mhz - Inno3D RTX 3090 X3 iCHILL 24 Gb  - 1x SSD M2 1800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - 1x 55” Sony 4K tv

My flightsim vids :  https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

 

Share this post


Link to post

Dear Santa. I've been a very good boy this year, so peerrrlllleeeeeeaaaaaasssseeee...

Share this post


Link to post

If this is true and nothing was wrong with your old installation...then we will have a very interesting topic to follow!

Again, wife doesn't like this, wallet doesn't like this, credit card doesn't like this, paypal doesn't like this...the list goes on...

Hoang Le

  • Upvote 1

Hoang Le

i7 10700F - ASUS ROG STRIX B460-F GAMING - 16GB Corsair DDR4-2666 - EVGA GTX 1080 SuperClocked

P3D v5

Share this post


Link to post

I had similar results as Rob using a 7700k (5.1ghz) coming from a 4770k (4.7ghz)... I'm also using a Titan X pascal SLI config... Maybe the RAM speed has its share (32gb running at 3866mhz). Regarding the settings difference: water and shadows in high and using dynamic light and lens flare... texture 2048 and texture_size_exp=9 (I like faster loading times)... I'm also using UT2 Live (85% comercial - 85% general) and same addons. Flying from Lax (Orbx SOCal) with a2a 172 gives me mid 30s to mid 40s from the VC and better frames (stay between 40 - 50) from the outside view.... in remote areas like CAG4 (Orbx PNW) I get even 100+ from the outside view... I think I'm going to uninstall P3D v3... :)


JzjBF8.png  80kts... V1... Rotate...

I9 9900K @ 5.0GHz HT On VCore Adaptive +0.01v LLC 6 - Asus Maximus XI Formula Z390 Cache @ 4.7Ghz Vccio 1.15v Vccsa 1.15v - Nvidia RTX 2080Ti FE OC - 32GB 4x8GB 3600MHz Dominator Platinum RGB 16-16-16-32 - 512GB + 2x 2TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD - 4K 55" LG OLED55B9PSB - EVGA SuperNOVA 1600 T2 PSU - Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS - MFG Crosswind - Corsair K95 RGB Platinum Cherry Speed - Corsair Glaive RGB PRO RGB - Corsair MM800 RGB Polaris - Xbox Elite Wireless Controller - Klipsch RB-61 II + SW-110 Subwoofer - Pioneer Elite SX-N30 Receiver - Hex Gear R80 black case - Herman Miller Embody Chair Black/Black.

 

Share this post


Link to post

Well, this could change my plans :huh: 

Thanks for posting this. I hope nothing was wrong with previous P3D installation


Zeljko Budovic

Share this post


Link to post

Well, he's posted the settings and the scenario, so let's give him some more results to compare to, to see if it really is this good! I'll run the same scenario with my lowly 3930K/1080ti setup and post back my results. I mean, it would be amazing if it really was giving this kind of performance and i'd def be looking at one if it's anywhere near this good!

Thanks for posting as ever Rob..

Share this post


Link to post

Rob, 

 

Excellent results - can you check with some major addons as stress test - Orbx California Regions with KLAX and PMDG 777 (or something similar) with AI and scenery set to max (or close to it).  I would like to see the stress results.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post

I tested using his files and graphic settings.  I'm running a 7700K at 4.5 with a 1080ti on 4K monitor at 60hz.  I usually only run 30hz so this is not my usual way to run the sim.  I usually run quite a bit lower settings as I'm a tube flyer so I don't need all the autogen etc at FL390.

According to a FRAPS avg test: 

48 fps average with no AM and HT on.

49 fps average with 245 AM and HT on.

 

Just for fun I used the PMDG 747 in the same situation and had an avg of 37 fps.

  • Upvote 1

Sean Green

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    48%
    $12,200.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...