helmuthmoya

Please PMDG 747 in X-Plane 11 !!!!!

Recommended Posts

Many people really wants to fly the 747 pmdg in X-Plane 11, many people are tired of this....

 

21981642_903667586455766_600205662_o.png

Please PMDG help us !!!! we need you in x-plane !!!!

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

v4 is stable for me, I am just leveling at cruise out of Dubai, came in from Bangkok, 2 hour turnaround, off to Colombo. PMDG 777-300ER and payware addon scenery at each airport. FPS might be 10-20 on ground but so stable. Try with a new p3d cfg and what addons and tweaks are you using? Are you overclocking your cpu? - David Lee

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If only it was that simple. I could be wrong, but I think they built the DC-6 to test it out in X-plane since building a plane for it seems to be an entirely different process altogether.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought I would do this but I purchased x plane a month ago and my initial impression is that I really like the sim. I'm getting 80fps but no addons and I don't believe you need as many addons for x plane as you do with P3D.What I really like is the scenery in the  day and awesome night lighting. Xplane scenery has more structure and just looks better. All I need is PMDG aircraft and I will remove P3D from my computer for good.  But until then I guess I have to use P3d because I don't have PMDG in x plane.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, helmuthmoya said:

Many people really wants to fly the 747 pmdg in X-Plane 11, many people are tired of this....

 

21981642_903667586455766_600205662_o.png

Please PMDG help us !!!! we need you in x-plane !!!!

 

 

 

 

 

Hmm, and I thought P3Dv4 solves all of the ills?  I know that this is hard to do for some people, but try this: start with the base sim alone, no add-ons sceneries, use only your PMDG birds and your weathers.  Then add AI, if the issue persists then it could be your AI package.  99% of the time this would remove all stability issues with the sim and PMDG.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Anxu00 said:

Hmm, and I thought P3Dv4 solves all of the ills?  I know that this is hard to do for some people, but try this: start with the base sim alone, no add-ons sceneries, use only your PMDG birds and your weathers.  Then add AI, if the issue persists then it could be your AI package.  99% of the time this would remove all stability issues with the sim and PMDG.  

I'd bet it's incompatible scenery.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, helmuthmoya said:

Please PMDG help us !!!! we need you in x-plane !!!!

Help you with what exactly? We'll have to see whether or not PMDG will come to XP . It took over a year to port the DC-6 to P3D and that's a simple aircraft. Imagine how hard it would be to port the 747...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PMDG has been working with Laminar Research for a few years. One of their Boeing jets could be in a more advanced stage in X-Plane.  They should have an announcement on more X-Plane plans fairly soon.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

P3dv4 is rock solid for me.

In fact, 64 bit P3D has eliminated the slim claim to superiority that xplane had...ibtl.

  • Upvote 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Luis_KMIA said:

PMDG has been working with Laminar Research for a few years. One of their Boeing jets could be in a more advanced stage in X-Plane.  They should have an announcement on more X-Plane plans fairly soon.

Source? PMDG didn't even get a heads up for the release if XP-11 from Laminar. They found out when we did so I doubt their working that closely with them or they'd at least have been in the XP developer beta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Boomer said:

P3dv4 is rock solid for me.

In fact, 64 bit P3D has eliminated the slim claim to superiority that xplane had...ibtl.

Only thing I wish P3D had was the immersive scenery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just be patient, unless the plan has cahnged they were to do at least two projects on XP, one which is the DC6 by making it first in XP and then port it to FSX/P3D, and a second one which would be the other way around make it first on FSX/P3D and then port it to XP, which has yet to come and could be anything. We'll have to wait for anouncements.

In the end both simulators are great each with their own pros and cons. P3D right now is still my main plateform, but I'm also one that would like more PMDG quality level products on XP, because on some area it just does much better, an example is the night environement which just always amazes me, also I'm really curious on when they'll get to use Vulkan/Mantle for rendereing as it could boost the performances significantly removing a lot of the overhead that there is with OpenGL/DirectX (below version 12). 

It's always good that their is two sims as it generate some competition, which can lead to interesting advances for us in the end :)

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, wedgantilles said:

unless the plan has cahnged they were to do at least two projects on XP

We were? Source link?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/24/2017 at 10:34 PM, scandinavian13 said:

We were? Source link?

Someone thinks that someone else mentioned that they saw someone else once, whose distant cousin might have seen it mentioned by someone he vaguely knows, on a forum somewhere, possibly. And as we know, everything on the internet is true.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, scandinavian13 said:

We were? Source link?

EDIT: Sorry Kyle, I was mistook your quote for what Luis_KMIA said.  Apologies for this.  However, it may apply to the person you were quoting.

Kyle,

I believe (not saying that this is absolute fact and I'm not trying to back him and say that "this is the absolute truth" but) that he is mentioning this from Froogle's (Peter Wright's) interview with Mr Robert S. Randazzo in a live stream that had a BAe 146 flying in the background.  The aim of it was to raise money for a incredibly unlucky member of our community.  

This is the link.

In this upload, I believe that Mr. Randazzo talked about being in "close contact with Laminar" and that they had been "working together" (I think it was in evaluating whether XP should be a simulator that PMDG should support) or something close to that.  I may be wrong and I'm sorry about not providing a timestamp - I don't want to rewatch a video for what is admittedly, a minor thing. :)

 

Edited by Guest
Personal Stupidity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/24/2017 at 6:14 AM, helmuthmoya said:

Many people really wants to fly the 747 pmdg in X-Plane 11, many people are tired of this....

 

21981642_903667586455766_600205662_o.png

Please PMDG help us !!!! we need you in x-plane !!!!

 

 

 

What kind of ....person are you?

I mean for real how did you make a crash in V4 possible??

I modded my v4 in everything wich is moddable (cfg inis and whatever esle) and i had never a crash with all sliders maxed and several AI aircraft imported by myself (grabbed the AI ac from fsx steam)

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Milton Waddams said:

Source? PMDG didn't even get a heads up for the release if XP-11 from Laminar. They found out when we did so I doubt their working that closely with them or they'd at least have been in the XP developer beta.

Old post from RSR using ht expression 'playing in the sandbox with LM' a few years ago. A recent post by RSR mentioned there would be an XP update soon.  Again, I would not be surprised, if at least one of the Boeing jets has been in development with XP.  I like the idea of god competition with XP and P3D, especially sine XP was way ahead of the game in terms of 64-bit.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Luis_KMIA said:

Old post from RSR using ht expression 'playing in the sandbox with LM' a few years ago. A recent post by RSR mentioned there would be an XP update soon.  Again, I would not be surprised, if at least one of the Boeing jets has been in development with XP.  I like the idea of god competition with XP and P3D, especially sine XP was way ahead of the game in terms of 64-bit.

You are posting as an expert "in the know" but all you are doing is interpreting Mr. Randazzo's marketing speak and claiming to have the real facts. I made this same mistake when I threw away my money buying the Queen for FSX Steam and believed their "less vas footprint than all our previous products!" - David Lee

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, 777200lrf said:

You are posting as an expert "in the know" but all you are doing is interpreting Mr. Randazzo's marketing speak and claiming to have the real facts. I made this same mistake when I threw away my money buying the Queen for FSX Steam and believed their "less vas footprint than all our previous products!" - David Lee

At the time, that was correct information, for what it's worth.

...and "threw [your] money away" is a bit overly dramatic, isn't it?

  • Upvote 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, 777200lrf said:

You are posting as an expert "in the know" but all you are doing is interpreting Mr. Randazzo's marketing speak and claiming to have the real facts. I made this same mistake when I threw away my money buying the Queen for FSX Steam and believed their "less vas footprint than all our previous products!" - David Lee

So you bought the 747 just for the reduced vas and not for anything else like a fully simulated 747? Seems a bit odd to me but it's your money.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, scandinavian13 said:

At the time, that was correct information, for what it's worth.

...and "threw [your] money away" is a bit overly dramatic, isn't it?

No it is not dramatic, being part time and not having the income I used to, spending 120 dollars on an fsx version when I would have finally spent more to upgrade to P3D and this was before v4 announced. I would have never bought the fsx version if I knew the 747 ate 500mb more vas than the already high 777. But I am enjoying p3dv4 with the 777 the only pmdg plane I was able to afford for p3d. All my other fsx aircrats the 747 and ngx are sitting in the hanger. - David Lee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Milton Waddams said:

So you bought the 747 just for the reduced vas and not for anything else like a fully simulated 747? Seems a bit odd to me but it's your money.

What I mean is if I knew the true vas numbers of the fsx version and not believed the "marketing hype" of all the pmdg people, I would have saved for another month or so and finally upgraded to p3d that is all. - David Lee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, 777200lrf said:

What I mean is if I knew the true vas numbers of the fsx version and not believed the "marketing hype" of all the pmdg people, I would have saved for another month or so and finally upgraded to p3d that is all. - David Lee

That makes a lot of sense actually, sorry about that.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Milton Waddams said:

That makes a lot of sense actually, sorry about that.

It had a happy ending it forced me to fall back in love with the 777 in p3dv4 - David Lee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now