FsLabs a320 released for P3Dv4

[G-YMML1 582]

8 minutes ago, Milton Waddams said:

You do know that you could get your desired fps by just lowering a few settings, right? All aircraft don't perform the same.

Perhaps you should stop your poisoned marketing right here. It doesn't help. "Lower your settings" agenda would work, if other expensive planes perform at the same level as FSL bus. It's not "lower your setting" anymore, it's "fix your freaking code for a sake of Buddha"  with the price tag of $140.  

[RTK1972 288]

6 minutes ago, G-YMML1 said:

Perhaps you should stop your poisoned marketing right here. It doesn't help. "Lower your settings" agenda would work, if other expensive planes perform at the same level as FSL bus. It's not "lower your setting" anymore, it's "fix your freaking code for a sake of Buddha"  with the price tag of $140.  

I have to agree G-YMML1. Performance is terrible compared to pmdg. And i think they have the same system depth in theier planes...

[out 769]

22 minutes ago, Egbert Drenth said:

Based on a $140 price tag I would have expected better.

Egbert, you should have gone the 37$ upgrade way like most simmers (including myself) did.
It would sound much better in the comparison than the 140.

[cnc3 14]

Before I go too much further in the analysis, is anyone else seeing this issue?

I start P3D and select either of the FSL A320s. The sim clunks along past the loading scenery and traffic stuff and then crashes to desktop. However, if I load the default F22 and then load the A320, all is fine.

At the moment, I'm just trying to determine whether it is my system or a more general issue.

[Nyxx 6,993]

Performance is not terrible like for like on my PC. It’s just not as good and with good reason.

An airbus is nothing like a ng to simulate. FSL have gone way beyond PMDG.

I love my PMDG,s but there not on the same leave the computers on board an airbus, fly by wire , laws, the list goes on.

There are not like for like.

[anzhe778 0]

3 minutes ago, cnc3 said:

Before I go too much further in the analysis, is anyone else seeing this issue?

I start P3D and select either of the FSL A320s. The sim clunks along past the loading scenery and traffic stuff and then crashes to desktop. However, if I load the default F22 and then load the A320, all is fine.

At the moment, I'm just trying to determine whether it is my system or a more general issue.

I have the same issue - ntdll.dll error.

[squerble 300]

It's something that's affecting a few people and we're investigating. As you've already found, load via a default aircraft first (preferably the Cub), then switch into A320X-X until we can issue a fix.

[cnc3 14]

1 minute ago, tumtiddle said:

It's something that's affecting a few people and we're investigating. As you've already found, load via a default aircraft first (preferably the Cub), then switch into A320X-X until we can issue a fix.

OK Thanks. I'll do that for now.

[Projs15 1]

Its a shame that the FS Labs Airbus is not available at lets say simmarket, one of the reason I wont buy this product is because I hate to make accounts on like 100 different places to buy my add-ons.

[groentesoep 22]

9 minutes ago, Projs15 said:

Its a shame that the FS Labs Airbus is not available at lets say simmarket, one of the reason I wont buy this product is because I hate to make accounts on like 100 different places to buy my add-ons.

You made an account here to post that... (Post count: 1)

[anden145 2,285]

16 minutes ago, Projs15 said:

Its a shame that the FS Labs Airbus is not available at lets say simmarket, one of the reason I wont buy this product is because I hate to make accounts on like 100 different places to buy my add-ons.

You're kidding, right? (or trolling?)

Is that what's holding you back?! 

[MadDog 353]

55 minutes ago, RTK1972 said:

I have to agree G-YMML1. Performance is terrible compared to pmdg. And i think they have the same system depth in theier planes...

I'm pretty sure FSL and FSDT share the same philosophy:  "Why do something simple if you can use more resources to make it complicated".  Consider FSL's AOCService... I can't think of a more complex, convoluted method to read a simple flightplan file.

[Nighthwk 566]

WHY do people expect default aircraft level performance when their sliders are almost full right? No offense to PMDG but FSL have gone way beyond them and trying to compare performancr between an inherently complex plane such as an A320 and a relatively simple plane such as a 737 is just stupid. I'll say it again, all planes perform differently and saying that you won't but an add-on because *gasp* a gets a full 5 fps less than a less complex aircraft is preposterous.

[Christopher Low 5,354]

Its a shame that the FS Labs Airbus is not available at lets say simmarket, one of the reason I wont buy this product is because I hate to make accounts on like 100 different places to buy my add-ons.

For the record......if you buy direct from the developer, they get a much larger percentage of the payment than if you buy the product from an online marketplace like SimMarket. For that reason alone, I prefer to buy direct.

[Nighthwk 566]

5 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

 

 

For the record......if you buy direct from the developer, they get a much larger percentage of the payment than if you buy the product from an online marketplace like SimMarket. For that reason alone, I prefer to buy direct.

 True, doesn't simmarket take like a 20% cut?