March 18, 20215 yr If that is what it takes, YES! GregH Intel Core i7 14700K / Palit RTX4070Ti Super OC / Corsair 32GB DDR5 6000 MHz / MSI Z790 M/board / Corsair NVMe 9500 read, 8500 write / Corsair PSU1200W / CH Products Yoke, Pedals & Quad; Airbus Side Stick, Airbus Quadrant / TrackIR, 32” 4K 144hz 1ms Monitor
March 18, 20215 yr @IcemanFBW As folks who may be looking into nav data at some point, I'm curious if you might have an enumeration of the things that seem to be missing or show stoppers. On the CJ4 side, the ones that stood out as far as possible incomplete data were no speed restrictions out of the existing API, missing extra RF leg details sometimes, and missing approaches with no specific runway termination. It didn't seem to be an enormous list of deficiencies, although speed restriction data certainly is important. Are there other areas that seem to be blockers? -Matt
March 18, 20215 yr 12 minutes ago, MattNischan said: @IcemanFBW As folks who may be looking into nav data at some point, I'm curious if you might have an enumeration of the things that seem to be missing or show stoppers. On the CJ4 side, the ones that stood out as far as possible incomplete data were no speed restrictions out of the existing API, missing extra RF leg details sometimes, and missing approaches with no specific runway termination. It didn't seem to be an enormous list of deficiencies, although speed restriction data certainly is important. Are there other areas that seem to be blockers? -Matt Considering your new role I just wanted to say that I am very happy to see that you are initiating these kind of discussions. Great stuff! Edited March 18, 20215 yr by espent // 5800X3D // RTX 3090 // 64GB RAM // HP REVERB G2 //
March 18, 20215 yr 11 hours ago, IcemanFBW said: ... shipping our own navdata, in a similar fashion to the Aerosoft CRJ ... Sounds good. I wonder if the microstutters that occur with the FBW A320 when a flightplan is loaded into the FMS - which do not occur in the CRJ - are related to the navdata in use. So that using your own navdata will also solve the microstutters?
March 18, 20215 yr I gotta say that I believe the consensus is "YES" A huge thank you for so very much work and the many improvements in this sim. On the negative side, I am just waiting, in vain, for you guys to put a foot wrong. LOL Well done and a great concept Thanks Tony Tony Chilcott. My System. Motherboard. ASRock Taichi X570 CPU Ryzen 9 3900x (not yet overclocked). RAM 32gb Corsair Vengeance (2x16) 3200mhz. 1 x Gigabyte Aorus GTX1080ti Extreme and a 1200watt PSU. 1 x 1tb SSD 3 x 240BG SSD and 4 x 2TB HDD OS Win 10 Pro 64bit. Simulators ... FS2004/P3Dv4.5/Xplane.DCS/Aeroflyfs2...MSFS to come for sure.
March 18, 20215 yr What exactly is missing from the default nav data? I ask because the Working Title Cj4 works perfectly fine with it - so curious what doesn't work for Airbus?
March 18, 20215 yr 8 minutes ago, highflyer2020 said: What exactly is missing from the default nav data? I ask because the Working Title Cj4 works perfectly fine with it - so curious what doesn't work for Airbus? Speed restrictions at SID/STAR waypoints. Holding patterns when part of a procedure. A lot of completely missing approaches at small to mid-sized US airports. Waypoint names that still show in the nav data that were removed from the US airspace system as much as 8 to 10 years ago. Some of the default data is fine - some is awful. Jim BarrettLicensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.
March 19, 20215 yr Would we ever be able to use the MSFS 2020 nav data? CPU: Core i5-6600K 4 core (3.5GHz) - overclock to 4.3 | RAM: (1066 MHz) 16GB MOBO: ASUS Z170 Pro | GeForce GTX 1070 8GB | MONITOR: 2560 X 1440 2K
March 19, 20215 yr 4 hours ago, JRBarrett said: Speed restrictions at SID/STAR waypoints. Holding patterns when part of a procedure. A lot of completely missing approaches at small to mid-sized US airports. Waypoint names that still show in the nav data that were removed from the US airspace system as much as 8 to 10 years ago. Some of the default data is fine - some is awful. Ding ding ding - perfect summation of default data. I finally went Navigraph. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
March 19, 20215 yr Huge YES from me! i9 13900KF @ 5.5Ghz | MoBo MSI PRO Z690-A WiFi | Corsair Vengeance Black RGB RS 64gb DDR4 3200MHz | MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Vanguard SOC 32GB | MP33 Pro 1TB M.2-2280 NVME SSD for OS | Samsung 870 QVO 2.5" 4TB SSD SATA2 | Samsung 990 PRO 2TB | Corsair RM1000X 2021 1300W 80 Plus Gold PSU | Antec Dark Fleet DF700 Flux Gaming Case | Win 11 home | Samsung 65" 4K TV | G512 Keyboard | Razer Basilisk V2 Mouse | WinCtrl URSA MINOR 32 Throttle Metal / 32 PAC Metal | WinCtrl Ursa Minor Sidestick |Velocity One Rudder | MiniCockpit FCU and EFIS | WinCtrl MCDU | Stream Deck XL | Tobii Eye Tracker | Pimax Crystal Light | Doug
March 19, 20215 yr A big 10-4 YES Ryzen 9 9950X3D @ 5.6Ghz + Corsair Nautilus Water Cooler - 64Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz - ASUS RTX 5070Ti 16Gb - Samsung G9 Odyssey 49 inch 5120x1440 Monitor - ASUS Crosshair X870E - Win 11 Pro - MSFS 2020 - 3 x NVMe M.2 1Tb - Fractal North XL Case "Tertia Optio, Latebra Factum" Steve Summers
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.