3 hours ago, MarcG said:

Have you met Asobo? 😄 SU7 was released and it was a complete shambles for VR and TrackIR users, UK WU Dover Cliffs lod was initially broken on release so it "popped" into view up close (same with Devils Tower after the first USA WU, you had to practically be on top of the thing before it was viewable).

So yes, they could well release with glaring issues as they have history in this department 😞

Do you ever say anything nice about Asobo? 

3 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said:

Like I mentioned, the elevation data is excellent in places. I haven't seen any terrain morphing. This is west of Edmonton. 

Wow that looks fabulous!  

3 hours ago, MarcG said:

certainly not, just providing evidence that Asobo have released WU (and SU) updates in the past with "glaring errors" so it can be expected that they've done the same with this WU 🙂

It's a VERY BIG PLANET so it's a giant challenge to get everything right--IOW, yes you can absolutely expect errors, some glaring, but truly, on the whole it's mostly, always, quite excellent, and cost everyone exactly no extra money.

16 minutes ago, Noel said:

It's a VERY BIG PLANET so it's a giant challenge to get everything right--IOW, yes you can absolutely expect errors, some glaring, but truly, on the whole it's mostly, always, quite excellent, and cost everyone exactly no extra money.

Yes, but a Canada update with severe issues in Vancouver and Toronto is not what I would expect.

55 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

Do you ever say anything nice about Asobo? 

Yes

30 minutes ago, Noel said:

It's a VERY BIG PLANET so it's a giant challenge to get everything right--IOW, yes you can absolutely expect errors, some glaring, but truly, on the whole it's mostly, always, quite excellent, and cost everyone exactly no extra money.

They could've at least fixed the known bugs issues with Canada during this update, but according to the official forums, even though the bugs are logged - they didn't...

7 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said:

Could someone remind me why it’s better to remove the WU PG. Does Vancouver actually look better?

Yes, the surrounding area returns to normal.

Someone made a custom CN-Tower model

https://flightsim.to/file/41244/cn-tower-toronto-on-canada

10 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

Someone made a custom CN-Tower model

https://flightsim.to/file/41244/cn-tower-toronto-on-canada

Or even better, the freeware Toronto and Greater Toronto Area Enhancement Pack by Roman Design: 

Edited October 1, 20223 yr by Cpt_Piett

2 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said:

Or even better, the freeware Toronto and Greater Toronto Area Enhancement Pack by Roman Design: 

 

In your opinion (not including the CN tower becasue I think Asobo will fix that) do you think the WU Canada has better photgammetry or Roman Designs? 

I cannot seem to decide.

Thanks

1 minute ago, fakeflyer737 said:

In your opinion (not including the CN tower becasue I think Asobo will fix that) do you think the WU Canada has better photgammetry or Roman Designs? 

I cannot seem to decide.

Thanks

Definitely Roman Designs. The tower looks cancerous and deformed with the PG from WU Canada. 

Without the tower and the question is not as easy to answer. But it's freeware so there's a very easy way to find out 🙂

Edited October 1, 20223 yr by Cpt_Piett

26 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said:

Or even better, the freeware Toronto and Greater Toronto Area Enhancement Pack by Roman Design: 

You've got 2 overlapping towers there.

The handcrafted CN Tower I linked is better than any photogrammetry ports.

Edited October 1, 20223 yr by Tuskin38

40 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

You've got 2 overlapping towers there.

The handcrafted CN Tower I linked is better than any photogrammetry ports.

Oh wow, I didn't notice, lol 😅

EDIT: Ah, there's also one included with FSimStudios CYTZ. And they've included some configurations where it is possible to make it compatible with the Roman scenery: 

Edited October 1, 20223 yr by Cpt_Piett

On 9/29/2022 at 5:16 PM, John Fields said:

I tested again without any add-on content in the community folder. The glitch is there.

The bug is visible from the Bella Coola Airport runway looking to the east. This is not a mesh error in a very remote area, but very close to the airport itself.

 

13 hours ago, Fielder said:

I have Orbx bella  coola installed and I also have the WU11 canada bella coola installed. I flew all around the airport and saw nothing strange. From the RY looking East everything looks perfect. I even flew all around with drone, everything looked perfect to me. 

Before I uninstalled the Canada Update (Bella Coola up ahead):

The river must be elevated about 100 feet or so above the valley floor, with the intersecting river with a reduced elevation.

2 hours ago, Noel said:

IOW, yes you can absolutely expect errors

Whaaaat????!! They've messed up the Isle of Wight too?😬

 

[joke!]