November 27, 20223 yr Assuming that we end up with very accurately modeled engine variants which actually replicate the real-world differences, I'd prefer this option over a remote CDU. Alan Bradbury Check out my youtube flight sim videos: Here
November 27, 20223 yr IAE (with accurately modelled differences) so that I can stop missing FSL. Best regards,Luis Hernández Main rig: self built, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D (with SMT off and CO -50 mV), 2x16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, Nvidia RTX 5060Ti 16GB, 256 GB M.2 SSD (OS+apps) + 2x1 TB SATA III SSD (sims) + 1 TB 7200 rpm HDD (storage), ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS air cooler, Viewsonic VX2458-MHD 1920x1080@120-144 Hz (G-sync compatible), Windows 11. Running P3D v5.4 (with v4.5 scenery objects as an additional library, just in case), FSX-SE, MSFS2020, MSFS2024 and even FS9! Lossless Scaling for all my sims. What a godsend...Mobile rig: ASUS Zenbook UM425QA (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H APU @3.2 GHz and boost disabled, 1 TB M.2 SSD, 16 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro). Running FS9 there .VKB Gladiator NXT Premium Left + GNX THQ as primary controllers. Xbox Series X|S wireless controller as standby/mobile.
November 27, 20223 yr IAE engine definitely. CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11
November 27, 20223 yr IAE for me 🙂 Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
November 27, 20223 yr 7 hours ago, Chapstick said: The CFM modeling is unfinished and it's not just fuel burn that's wrong, the entire start sequence is off. And IAE's would be a way more interesting and expansive feature. Remote CDU should be way lower on the list behind fixing FMGC bugs, EFB rewrite, etc. Basically, the way they're prioritizing things right now is right. These things should be fixed when the engine rewrite is done and the other bugs you mentioned will get fixed in due course unless some are already fixed.
November 27, 20223 yr IAE for sure Vote to fix transparent sun visors having no effect on the sun glare effect in MSFS at: https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/sun-shades-sun-visors-not-influencing-light-in-cockpit/691565/
November 27, 20223 yr Definitely IAE AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, 64GB DDR5 6000MHZ RAM, RX7900XT, FreeSync 165hz 1440p display
November 27, 20223 yr The lack of remote CDU for me is the reason not to buy the Fenix yet but to stay with FBW A320 where it is implemented. Regards, Chris -- PC: Intel 13900K, Gigabyte Geforce RTX 4090, 64GB Fury Beast DDR5 RAM; Display: Varjo Aero VR
November 28, 20223 yr On 11/27/2022 at 3:54 PM, guenseli said: Please do not take it too serious 😉 But I'm really interested where the focus from a customers point of view probably is. A remote CDU is for me, personally, very important. I can't care less if the Bus is driven by a IAE or PW or whatever, at least it should be behave like the real one. As far as I can interpret some comments from Aamir, the Fenix dev, there are no technical reasons to not have a remote EFB (as we all thought, because of Prosim etc.). It is simply the customers choices which want IAE more. That shouldn't meant to force the Fenix devs anywhere. I just want a personal picture how important remote CDUs are for other people. Many thanks for taking part. i don't think this poll had the intended outcome you may have wanted but nice try haha IAE for me
November 28, 20223 yr I miss an option. The poll should have been: 0 IAE Engine 0 Remote CDU 0 Dash 8 Q400 The last one would have my vote. Everything else is of no importance to me at all.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.