12 minutes ago, mpo910 said:

As long as it is respectful its fine.

Problem is, hyperbole s seldom respectful.  
-B

 

Their marketing certainly didn't help. The extreme hype they created and positioning their product as the holy grail of flight sim vs a large number of customers not even being able to complete a flight without the entire aircraft freezing up is a stark contrast.

7 hours ago, Fiorentoni said:

Are those without issue people that just enter the flightplan and basic stuff and then never touch the FMC again? Since basically any page outside of the INIT and FPLN pages can lead to WASM crashes, I just think the reason that some people do 20 flights without having a single WASM crash because they are simming very differently (casually if you will). I‘ve had WASM crashes in 75% of my A350 flights, FIX INFO, SURV, NAV RAD, SEC FPLN all of those are (or at least were) bound to crash the WASM sooner or later.

I can relate to that. Most my issues were caused by functionalities outside of INIT and FPLN pages.

5 hours ago, Simon_C said:

I can relate to that. Most my issues were caused by functionalities outside of INIT and FPLN pages.

Anew patch 1.03 was released. Let's try this one out and see how things go. At least their trying to fix their issues on the fly.

Report back.

12 hours ago, crimplene said:

The A350 clearly has a lot of bugs and complaining is absolutely ok in my opinion. But every so often complains are presented in a very dramatic form. 🙂 Most prominent example in this thread is it's title. Talking about "catastrophic as never seen before" is just a little bit silly.

Agreed - I'd be keen to see how the OP would react to a "real" catastrophe.

Nothing even close to this release being "catastrophic".  

Jase

3rd patch is uneventful for me

Never seen before? Have you seen MsFS 2024? Lol

11 hours ago, MassiveSim32 said:

OP would react to a "real" catastrophe

I used the word catastrohic in context of a software release with so many obvious bugs. In that context it is catastrohic to me.

Of course this has nothing to do with "real-World catastrophic situations. 

8 hours ago, sd_flyer said:

3rd patch is uneventful for me

For me the 3 patch works also till now.....2 hours in flight. Keep my fingers crossed. I left TCAS on standby though....as this caused many of my freezes

6 hours ago, UAL4life said:

Never seen before? Have you seen MsFS 2024? Lol

I have written in one of my posts later that it was ment for Addons.....nope....none of the addons seemed so bugged after release to me indeed.

MSFS2024 was indeed a bad release in my opinion.....(as a plattform)

Haven't had an issue since release to be honest. I've flown on VATSIM several times, never had a WASM crash. 

The only thing I don't have/use is GSX. 

@mpo910 No software is perfect at the release. Even Fenix, it took them a few years to reach where they are now. The tcas issue on 350 which presumably fixed in new update, Pmdg 737 still has this problem. 

Ini brought up such a beautiful aircraft in the Sim market with so many features never seen before. They have a talented team, i am sure they are working hard and will do their best to make it better. 

It's a live product that will get improve and updated. I think it's not a bad deal to have such a beautiful aircraft instead of no aircraft. My 2 cents. 

10 minutes ago, LineDX said:

@mpo910 No software is perfect at the release. Even Fenix, it took them a few years to reach where they are now. The tcas issue on 350 which presumably fixed in new update, Pmdg 737 still has this problem. 

Ini brought up such a beautiful aircraft in the Sim market with so many features never seen before. They have a talented team, i am sure they are working hard and will do their best to make it better. 

It's a live product that will get improve and updated. I think it's not a bad deal to have such a beautiful aircraft instead of no aircraft. My 2 cents. 

Further to the previous post, please have a look at vatsim network to see  how many virtual pilots flying the 350. 

 

https://vatsim-radar.com/

1 hour ago, LineDX said:

 No software is perfect at the release.

 

58 minutes ago, LineDX said:

please have a look at vatsim network to see  how many virtual pilots flying the 350.

First I did not say that I expect perfect software. Read my posts again if you got that impression. It weren´t my words and it is not my expectation at all.

What has the number of customers to say about the quality of the software? When marketing is good, and customers search such a plane, then the number of customers are high....but the quality may still not be high enough to match the average expectatiions.

Look at their forum, have a view at their discord and you will see how many posts with "wasm" there are and how many state the plane is totatlly unusable for many customers.

In my opinion that where simply way to much issues on release. Nobody has to agree with me, but I was interested in other opinions and your posts says nothing about how you see this.....

Regards

marcus

2 hours ago, LineDX said:

@mpo910 No software is perfect at the release. Even Fenix, it took them a few years to reach where they are now. The tcas issue on 350 which presumably fixed in new update, Pmdg 737 still has this problem. 

Ini brought up such a beautiful aircraft in the Sim market with so many features never seen before. They have a talented team, i am sure they are working hard and will do their best to make it better. 

It's a live product that will get improve and updated. I think it's not a bad deal to have such a beautiful aircraft instead of no aircraft. My 2 cents. 

Between "perfect" and "every button press can lead to a fatal WASM crash" there's a lot in between. Neither the Fenix nor the PMDG aircraft have been crashing left right and center after release. Not even Aerosoft or FSS have had that. That's how low one must rank iniBuilds in terms of stability, go figure.