Little known fact: 7 out of 10 lawyers are flight simmers.

Little known fact: 7 out of 10 lawyers are flight simmers.

 

lol

What?  You don't get your legal advice on flightsim message boards?  Seems like a great place for legal advice. 

 

I am dealing with probate court right now,  I am going to post a thread on here for advice.

You'll get some hits, believe me.

 

Little known fact: 7 out of 10 lawyers are flight simmers.

And 7 out of 10 flightsimmers are lawyers in the making.

I see the want to be lawyers are out in full force.

 

Ha, ha...next time I need a lawyer, I'm not paying the big bucks to the one I've been using.  I'll just post my legal problems on Avsim forums, and the lawyers will come crawling out of the walls like cockroaches.

 

I forgot what this thread was all about  :huh:

I forgot what this thread was all about  :huh:

Yup.

 

The posters attempting to be armchair lawyers?

 

There are far more posters attempting to be armchair pilots. Are you offensive about them too?

Is there a way to down vote some posts? I was enjoying an informative thread until I reached this page.

 

 

--

 

Amazon has this feature where on a comment thread if a lot of people down vote a comment it doesn't show unless you select it. Wouldn't hurt to have it here.

Would buy attorney simulator lol.

OK OK OK, I guess I'll go ahead and ask the question...

 

Can we see your EULA?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

How on Earth can someone be expected to have written a Licencing Agreement, for a product that does not yet exist?   The EULA is relevent to the product that will be vended - why would he be expected to have sat down and written a EULA when he is still in the very early R&D Stage of his project?   :rolleyes:

 

It seems that some users have absolutely no intent or interest in the content of threads in this forum, other than to disrupt, cast their negative and destructive viewpoints, and try to assert some sort of superiority over other members, to satisfy their egos.

What, the original idea of a new flightsim?

 

or

 

The posters attempting to be armchair lawyers?

 

Both, do not see new flight sim. Poster armchair lawyers just 3 years of law school and bar exam and then you can sue who you want at your hearts content.

the sub-thread is getting further and further off-track.

 

In my initial post (#135) I simply pointed out that Microsoft or Lockheed Martin could stop FSNext dead in it's tracks should they wish if it used  FSX input files. That is still the case.

the sub-thread is getting further and further off-track.

 

In my initial post (#135) I simply pointed out that Microsoft or Lockheed Martin could stop FSNext dead in it's tracks should they wish if it used  FSX input files. That is still the case.

It's still the case that you're pointing that out and there have been a number of posts saying the opposite. Unless you're a lawyer specialising in IP law in the US then that opinion has no more weight than anyone else. That's why I suggested to the guys to go speak to the EFF as they know a lot more about this than anyone here in this thread.

 

Back on topic, I hope these guys pull this off as there is still a big gap in the market for a GA sim that can seamlessly introduce an engine that utilises new technology and yet provide API and licence terms with the current FSX ecosystem.

There are far more posters attempting to be armchair pilots. Are you offensive about them too?

 

This is a flight-sim forum, not a "lawyer-sim" forum.  

Did you notice that the original FSXnext developer has gotten so bored and disinterested with this thread that he quit putting any comments?

There are those of us who would like to continue to hear from him.

Have I just read about 3 pages and none of it to do with the new Simulator currently under development...

 

FFS..

Maybe a suggestion would be that those more interested in the legal aspect of all this stay in this thread and then the rest of us who rather discuss FSNext head over to the blog announced by the OP...