August 22, 20241 yr For me I always have to be all in on my planes. So if a developer for example makes a 727 I have to have all the variants available even if I don't fly some of them much. Same goes for the A320 series. I also like to simulate airline Ops as close as possible and if an airline has an A321 on the route for reals that is what I select. I guess I am some sort of weirdo when it comes to Flight Simulation but I think we all are to some degree. If nothing else even though all the planes are the same series they are still distinctly different in character even on something like the A320 series. Thanks to the Fly-By-Wire technology they really do all pretty much fly the same. This is by design so one pilot can be type rated in all variants. However the A319 tends to handle hot and high situations better and tend to be more sporty. Depending on airline options the A319 also tends to have the best range of them all. The A321 especially earlier builds tend to have a lot of restrictions in the operating manual and because of the longer fuselage and higher weights the A321 is a bit hotter on the landing and takeoff speeds. If you just have one variant the plane tends to get pretty boring quickly. With multiple versions you can fly them all at different types and enjoy the difference.
August 22, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, ahsmatt7 said: No he shouldn’t. With all due respect, this isn’t a charity. He shouldnt spend money as an obligatory thank you unless he feels the same as you. Don’t tell people that. That’s ridiculous. Get off your Mattitude. The title is "Convince me to buy the Fenix expansion?", can you read?
August 22, 20241 yr Well the A321 gives me 757 vibes(looks wise not perf), so isnt that reason enough? Lian Li 011 Air Mini | AMD 9800X3D | Asus ROG STRIX B650E-F | Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer II 280mm RGB | 2x32GB G.Skill DDR5-6000 | ASUS TUF RTX 5090 | Seasonic Prime Platinum 1000W | Pimax Crystal Light
August 22, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, ahsmatt7 said: No he shouldn’t. With all due respect, this isn’t a charity. He shouldnt spend money as an obligatory thank you unless he feels the same as you. Don’t tell people that. That’s ridiculous. I don’t think it’s ridiculous at all. I spend $20 per month for SayIntentions, and sometimes don’t fly for weeks on end. I could of course just cancel my sub and restart later, but I’m supporting a product I enjoy and wish to succeed further. I’ll buy the Felix airbus variants even though I doubt I’ll fly them much, but in part to support the developers. I don’t consider either of these scenarios a “charity.” I spend this money in my own self interest to advance the world of flight simulation. Gary i9-13900K, Asus RTX 4080, Asus Z790 Plus Wi-Fi, 32 GB Ram, Seasonic GX-1000W, LG C1 48” OLED 4K monitor, Quest 3 VR
August 22, 20241 yr Here's a reason: You can now fly into Paro and have a slightly higher chance of survival lol AMD 9950X3D | 64 GB RAM | RTX 5090 FMR: 747 FO, 757/767 CAPT, 737 Check Airman Current 777 CAPT
August 22, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, V1ROTA7E said: slightly higher chance of surviva slightly is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. 🙂 Edited August 22, 20241 yr by BrammyH
August 22, 20241 yr What a futile exercise. I won't try to convince you, and some who do might take the blame afterwards if you don't like it. You should already have enough information out there and plenty of YouTube reviews. If you are going into it this deeply, you are probably going to buy it anyway. The FOMO is strong in flight sim addons! Rob (but call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind). I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio. Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's. Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.
August 22, 20241 yr I tried few flights in A319, but I'm back to PMDG 777. I like to see "cell" reflected in my shiny WX radar on NAV display. I also enjoy changing altitude on MCP panel with my Honeycomb Bravo knob. Finally, I dig CRM and love when my AI co-pilot handle ATC calls. Other than that Fenix has a great expansion! Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
August 22, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, sd_flyer said: I tried few flights in A319, but I'm back to PMDG 777. I like to see "cell" reflected in my shiny WX radar on NAV display. I also enjoy changing altitude on MCP panel with my Honeycomb Bravo knob. Finally, I dig CRM and love when my AI co-pilot handle ATC calls. Other than that Fenix has a great expansion! Yea, I have to say there are some real benefits to an aircraft designed to operating within the sim; I miss these things too. Still enjoying the FENIX, have done 4 flights these past two days, but I wish it was more fully integrated like PMDG have done. Edited August 22, 20241 yr by Cognita MSFS 2024. Primary Planes: Black Square TBM850, Duke, Baron, Caravan; A2A Comanche; FSReborn Phenom; Fexix A321; PMDG 737-7, 777: Utilities: Active Sky (Passive Mode); BATC, FSLTL.
August 22, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Cognita said: Yea, I have to say there are some real benefits to an aircraft designed to operating within the sim; I miss these things too. Still enjoying the FENIX, have done 4 flights these past two days, but I wish it was more fully integrated like PMDG have done. At some point of time Fenix was ahead of many developers with great intuitive EFB and all MDCU extra features. However, I must say, now I'm looking forward to the next major update for TFDi MD-11 which suppose to bring all those stuff that PMDG 777 has. In my opinion PMDG 777 is the new standard for airliners at the moment ! At the same time a healthy competition is always a great way to move sim forward. So I would love to see other developer surprise us with stepping up the game! Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
August 22, 20241 yr 8 hours ago, outermarker said: Even if you don't care about the specific differences between the variants, you should buy it as a ‘thank you’ for the Fenix team. Just think of the significant updates we received for the A320 for free. It's basically a completely different and rebuilt add-on than what came with the initial release. Not to mention the Sharklet expansion that is still to come, also for free. They've invested heavily into the A320, and if you ask me, they deserve all the support in the world. DITTO!!!! Bill McIntyre Asus StrixB650E-F Gamer, AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, Corsair Titanium DDR5 64GB, Samsung 990 PRO-4TB M.2, (4) 2TB SSD's, Corsair H1150i liquid cooler, RTX 2080TI Founders Edition, (2) LG 34" HD Curved Monitor, Sound Blaster Audigy X, 1Kw PC Power & Cooling Power Supply, Corsair Obsidian Full tower Case. MSFS 2024, WIN11 Pro x64
August 22, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, sd_flyer said: In my opinion PMDG 777 is the new standard for airliners at the moment Yes, I basically agree. The 777 was a polished release and has been very enjoyable to fly. The 737 was quite shaky and to this day I am quite underwhelmed by it, but it seems PMDG has been learning along the way and figured a good deal of stuff out, I am quite pleased with that aircraft. Looking more forward to the 747 now. MSFS 2024. Primary Planes: Black Square TBM850, Duke, Baron, Caravan; A2A Comanche; FSReborn Phenom; Fexix A321; PMDG 737-7, 777: Utilities: Active Sky (Passive Mode); BATC, FSLTL.
August 22, 20241 yr Commercial Member More than the fact of matching the flights with the right models, expecting a different flight experience with the different members of the A-32 family or any of the other reasons that users seek to justify their purchase; personally I think that the best excuse to make the upgrade in Fenix A320 is the total support to the developer both economically and emotionally and in this way encourage the continuous improvement of the product. It's just my opinion.
August 23, 20241 yr I have a question of my own on the Fenix range as when it comes to a modern jet I mainly fly the 737 and 777 and there is a very pragmatic reason for this as within the sim I find the Airbus displays to be hard to read in comparison, the fonts are so thin and tiny that I always find myself having to zoom in to read them, I can never find that sweet spot compared to 737 and 777 where I can definitely read the screens while maintaining what I consider a natural seating position. Not sure how the fenix compares to the FBW and inibuilds 320's where I always find myself annoyed with those displays after a while because of that zoom in/out necessity. I assume that's just the reality of those displays and simulated as such so I guess it is what it is but I'm still curious to hear people's thoughts on this, maybe it's purely a me problem. 😵
August 23, 20241 yr 12 hours ago, Tony P said: Love the A320 but other than different sizes - is there anything that stands out to why I should purchase this? Thx Why would you trust someone else to convince you to buy something? seems ridiculous.
Create an account or sign in to comment