May 30, 20251 yr I frequently look at the IniBuilds forum. There is one real life A350 Pilot called "Der Michel" who does the most awesome bug reports. Very thorough and on point, with examples from the FCOM or pictures from the real displays of the aircraft. So everytime a new update drops I look for fixes of stuff that he reported. This guy is invaluable as community feedback.
May 30, 20251 yr 1 hour ago, Farlis said: I frequently look at the IniBuilds forum. There is one real life A350 Pilot called "Der Michel" who does the most awesome bug reports. Very thorough and on point, with examples from the FCOM or pictures from the real displays of the aircraft. So everytime a new update drops I look for fixes of stuff that he reported. This guy is invaluable as community feedback. Have to visit their forum. Never even registered there I guess ... Looking fwd to read his posts. Thx! Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
May 30, 20251 yr 3 hours ago, iFlySimX said: I think it has potential but for me it's a lot about the eye candy and performance is far from good... If you like eye candy and don't care about the rest then it's great! Not true, at least for me. I get great performance and great operations. I did a 10-hour flight from South America to Anchorage with the 1.0.1.0 patch and had no issues. Can't understand what performance issues other people are experiencing. I don't sit at my computer and analyze frame rates, but as long as everything is running smoothly, I can care if frame rates are 0. Bill McIntyre Asus StrixB650E-F Gamer, AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D, Corsair Titanium DDR5 64GB, Samsung 990 PRO-4TB M.2, (4) 2TB SSD's, Corsair H1150i liquid cooler, RTX 2080TI Founders Edition, (2) LG 34" HD Curved Monitor, Sound Blaster Audigy X, 1Kw PC Power & Cooling Power Supply, Corsair Obsidian Full tower Case. MSFS 2024, WIN11 Pro x64
May 30, 20251 yr I have seen no performance issues since not long after release. I wonder could it be a AMD- Intel issue.? AMD Ryzen 7800x3d 64gb DDR5, Sapphire 7900 GPU MSSI Tomahawk AM5 M/Board. 1x 4tb Crucial M.2 SSD, 3x 2tb Crucial M.2 SSD's
May 30, 20251 yr I have seen performance issues even with this build, doesn't seem to improve- love the aircraft and hope that iniBuilds works on optimization for those of us not running the latest HW.... fingers x'ed... Best- Carl Avari-Cooper
May 30, 20251 yr I have had it since release, performance has always been outstanding and I have done many long haul flight up to 18 hrs and can not recall ever having a CTD. With improved systems each update it is by far my favourite airliner and I seem to go to it more than the Boeings that are now on the scene. David Porrett
May 30, 20251 yr No performance issue at all here with my outdated system. Did not try the latest update though but don’t expect and deteriorating performance. Just don’t fly the 340 recently since I love that Winwing MCDU which is not (yet) compatible Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
May 31, 20251 yr 6 hours ago, AnkH said: We get a printer. While e.g. the three axle bogie still behaves like on a bad freeware plane. But hey, we get a printer! So we can watch the printer print at 30FPS, while the PMDG 772 runs at 60, but sadly no printer... Priorities And all Vatsim traffic is still +/- 1,000ft off on the ND. Eric
May 31, 20251 yr 35 minutes ago, B777ER said: And all Vatsim traffic is still +/- 1,000ft off on the ND. Have you reported it? --Sean Hart
May 31, 20251 yr To me it's worth every penny. Why? Because I haven't spent a penny on it! Reviews are way too mixed for me to pull the trigger. Statements like "I get great performance" or "I get terrible performance" are mostly completely pointless, unless there are hard numbers relative to addons, scenery, system, setup, and resolution.
May 31, 20251 yr I just got the bird v1.0.11 (MSFS2024) and tried to load an Air France no cabin model. It takes ages, much more than PMDG 772 or Fenix A320... I had to abort, I'll restart and try again later... 😑 Maybe that for the first time I should have loaded the iniBuilds model... Edited May 31, 20251 yr by Simicro FS2024
May 31, 20251 yr 5 minutes ago, Simicro said: I just got the bird v1.0.11 (MSFS2024) and tried to load an Air France no cabin model. It takes ages, much more than PMDG 772 or Fenix A320... I had to abort, I'll restart and try again later... 😑 Maybe that for the first time I should have loaded the iniBuilds model... Everytime there is an update the WASM files need to be recompiled. That takes up to 20 minutes.
May 31, 20251 yr 11 hours ago, Simselli said: I have seen no performance issues since not long after release. I wonder could it be a AMD- Intel issue.? I doubt, because I just switched from Intel 13600K to a Ryzen 9800X3D. While the loading times are considerably faster with the AMD, the absolute FPS are comparably bad when finally loaded into the sim and compared to the 772. Greetings, Chris AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 2x32GB DDR5 6000MT/s RAM, MSI RTX 4090 Ventus 3X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS2024
Create an account or sign in to comment