3 hours ago, sd_flyer said:

You can find out by exploring the cockpit

Thanks. I don't have it. Watched a few videos, and I didn't notice streamers coming across anything significant missing during normal procedures, which would be pretty good for that price.

Edited July 28, 2025Jul 28 by d.tsakiris

It’s a great add-on considering the cost. It has a lot of character and the systems are deep enough for it to be fun to fly. It looks good and handles nicely

For me, it is the right balance of functionality, price and fun factor. 

May as well give my small take,

Outside modelling is very good

Inside cabin is very good

Cockpit modelling could be better(maybe even a lot better), but I've certainly seen a lot worse.

Flight modelling I have no idea, but it flies amazingly well even without the AP. One of the easiest planes  I have ever sim flown

Every button that should (need) to work to make the plane start fly and stop works. The others don't. (I personally don't care)

EFB is very very simple, but does what it needs to.

Autopilot is simple and works. basically step up from GA and under more commercial planes.

Oh yeah, night lighting is very good.

She is fun to fly, just don't expect it to be a Fenix or PMDG. 

I was very much on the fence, but I am glad I got her. 

 

Edited July 28, 2025Jul 28 by Ron Lefebvre

2 hours ago, Farlis said:

Tilt does not work on ANY aircraft. It's simply not supported by the sim so far.

Are you sure?  Could have sworn I used WX Tilt in other aircraft and it seemed to work as expected.

20 minutes ago, SayAgain said:

Are you sure?  Could have sworn I used WX Tilt in other aircraft and it seemed to work as expected.

Yes. It does not work, never has.

5 hours ago, Beagle12 said:

Thanks Bunchy 🙂

Your welcome

3 hours ago, d.tsakiris said:

Thanks. I don't have it. Watched a few videos, and I didn't notice streamers coming across anything significant missing during normal procedures, which would be pretty good for that price.

It is pretty good for a price! I just wish little more depth like A2A

On 7/26/2025 at 10:07 AM, chapstick said:

Sure, but I think I prefer the deeper systems simulate on the Longitude

This has to be one of the craziest statements I've read in this thread.😶  I'll give this some merit for the 2024 version but the Longitude in 2020 is seriously lacking.  The cabin is not modeled much less the cabin/cargo doors (some crazy standard default 2020 aircraft had).  The external sounds especially at cruise is muted meaning lower that you would expect externally. The cockpit, avionics, and performance are there in great detail but the default Longitude is in no way on the level of FlightFX's Citation X.🤔 

1 hour ago, Dillon said:

I'll give this some merit for the 2024 version

That's the one I'm using. 

1 hour ago, Dillon said:

The cockpit, avionics, and performance are there in great detail

That's why I said I prefer the deeper systems simulation.

1 hour ago, Dillon said:

This has to be one of the craziest statements I've read in this thread.

Do I sound less crazy now?

25 minutes ago, chapstick said:

Do I sound less crazy now?

Yes...😉  One of these days when I switch to 2024 I'll be able to see the Longitude in all its glory but as of now the Citation X beats it.  Does the 2024 Longitude cabin have allot of features like the Citation? I've seen limited screenshots.🫤

Edited July 29, 2025Jul 29 by Dillon

33 minutes ago, chapstick said:

That's why I said I prefer the deeper systems simulation

I know the Longitude is a very good simulation, especially for a default aircraft, but which systems are „deeper“ simulated in comparison to the C750? Could you give an example? Just curious, because I‘m not that familiar with most biz jets and just fly them occasionally.

Edited July 29, 2025Jul 29 by roesti

1 hour ago, roesti said:

Just curious, because I‘m not that familiar with most biz jets and just fly them occasionally.

I guess it's my mandated time to chime with just a small video on the systems depth. 😉

I think the Longitude gets a lot of
- It can't be that deep because it's a default plane
- It can't be that deep because it's so easy to just get in and fly it

But, not to derail here! The C750 is already in my hangar, and I'm excited to try it out. Had great fun with the Vision Jet and the Piaggio.

23 minutes ago, MattNischan said:

I think the Longitude gets a lot of
- It can't be that deep because it's a default plane
- It can't be that deep because it's so easy to just get in and fly it

 

Thank you very much 🙂I already know the video and are fully aware that the Longitude is a fantastic aircraft, especially for default. I was just curious what the C750 is "lacking" in comparison, because the statement was the longitude is "deeper simulated".

Personally, I enjoy both and am very happy with the C750.

Edited July 29, 2025Jul 29 by roesti

The 750 is miles better in pitch power management. 

The 700 has a tendency to have way too high angle of attack on final. 

13 minutes ago, Farlis said:

The 750 is miles better in pitch power management. 

The 700 has a tendency to have way too high angle of attack on final. 

Are you rated in any of these in the real world.😐