Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

FlightSimLabs A320 - Release Very Soon!

Featured Replies

Hi! Folks,

 

I think that FlightSimLabs A320 will be release in July, 2016. The prove is Navigraph already released Airac cycle 1607 as below:

 

b8rbc2.jpg

 

 

Bad news no P3D version yet, only FSX  and FSX:SE.

 

:smile:

 

 

 

José Luís
 
| Flightsimulator: MSFS | Add-Ons: | PMDG Douglas DC-6 | PMDG 737-700 | Fenix A320 | Maddog X MD82| FSW CESSNA 414AW CHANCELLOR |
  • Replies 101
  • Views 21.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • As stated on post 29 on this thread, it is our intention to release for P3D after the release for FSX. I appreciate that this is frustrating for customers on P3D - but given the complexity of the prod

  • Hi Jose,   We've been completing our testing and ensuring that the installers are working properly. Given the complexity of both the simulation and the technologies it's built upon - this is a very

That's good news!

I  believe  it  when i  actually released,  no news  on the  actual fslab  forum as of  yet

I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card,  RM850 power supply

 

Peter kelberg

I'll be curious about how it compares to the Aerosoft one.  I'm sure it will be better but in what ways?  Looking forward to reviews.

Gregg Seipp

"A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane.  A great landing is when you can reuse it."
i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090

Yea  be  interesting  when it  comes  out,  suppose it be  like  comparing  the  ifly737  to  pmdg 737 ngx

I7-8700k,Corsair h1101 cooler ,Asus Strix Gaming Intel Z370 S11 motherboard, Corsair 32gb ramDD4,, gtx 1080ti Card,  RM850 power supply

 

Peter kelberg

Hope so!

 

But to be fair, Navigraph having that format listed could just be one entry on FSL's project plan, that may still have another 3 months of milestones to achieve before release.

Bill 😎
FS2024 • Currently in 'GA mode' : A2A Comanche 2024 & Aerostar • Black Square C208, Bonanzas, Barons, TBM850, Dukes • COWS DA40 & DA42 • FSW Legacy, C24R Sierra & C414 • Echo Falco F8L • FFX HJET, Visionjet and P180 2024 • Got Friends A32 Vixxen • FSReborn Sirius TL3000, Sting S4 and Piper M500 • Flyboy Rans S6S • Skyward DA50RG • SWS Zenith CH701, RV-8, RV-10, RV-14, PC12 • Milviz C310R • Air Foil Labs Bristell B23 
TrackIR • BeyondATC • PMS GTN Payware • RealTurb • Axis & Ohs • FS Realistic Pro
9800X3D • RTX 3080 • 64GB DDR5-6000
NPPL licence holder in the UK

  • Moderator

I'll be curious about how it compares to the Aerosoft one. I'm sure it will be better but in what ways?

The FSL version will be more of a "study sim" featuring failures, abnormal operations, etc., just like what PMDG do. We're as the Aerosoft Bus is set up for "normal" operations with no failures and perhaps not 100% system functionality. Not to say that the FSL will have 100% system functionality either due to the confines of it being a desk top sim, but it will be more in depth than the Aerosoft version.

 

I don't own the Aerosoft Bus and don't have any interest in either since I'm not an Airbus fan, but from what I've read, those are the main differences.

Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator

 

 


We're as the Aerosoft Bus is set up for "normal" operations with no failures and perhaps not 100% system functionality.

 

Yeah, Aerosoft calls it 'lite'.  I fly it and think "this is lite?"  There are no GA aircraft that I'm aware of with that much system depth.  Navigraph, functional FMS, fully functional autopilot, great framerates...no crashes, no ugly graphics, fully LINDA/FSUIPC compatible.  The closest you could get is the 70 year old A2A PA24 or the RealAir offerings.  Would it be misguided to ask them to package all that code into a rock-solid modern GA aircraft?

Gregg Seipp

"A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane.  A great landing is when you can reuse it."
i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090

Yeah, Aerosoft calls it 'lite'. I fly it and think "this is lite?" There are no GA aircraft that I'm aware of with that much system depth. Navigraph, functional FMS, fully functional autopilot, great framerates...no crashes, no ugly graphics, fully LINDA/FSUIPC compatible. The closest you could get is the 70 year old A2A PA24 or the RealAir offerings. Would it be misguided to ask them to package all that code into a rock-solid modern GA aircraft?

The aerosoft bus does not fly like a real bus, FSL claims theirs flies like a real bus not only In normal law but alt and abnormal alt as well. This would be why the FSL bus took 6 years to develop.

 

It also appears that FSL created their own ground modeling outside the sim for realistic taxi, single engine taxi,T/O run and rollout behavior.

 

The FSL bus comes with a much better lighting system and ASN WXR.

 

That is just a couple of differences, long story short if accuracy matters then you want the FSL bus

Mike Avallone

[email protected],Corsair H115i cooler,ASUS 2080TI,GSkill 32GB pc3600 ram, 2 WD black NVME ssd drives, ASUS maximus hero MB

 

Yeah, Aerosoft calls it 'lite'. I fly it and think "this is lite?" There are no GA aircraft that I'm aware of with that much system depth. Navigraph, functional FMS, fully functional autopilot, great framerates...no crashes, no ugly graphics, fully LINDA/FSUIPC compatible. The closest you could get is the 70 year old A2A PA24 or the RealAir offerings. Would it be misguided to ask them to package all that code into a rock-solid modern GA aircraft?

2 things...

 

First, you have never seen that amount of coding and systems work in a GA airplane because the amount of systems in a GA airplane is far less than what's in an airbus.

 

Secondly, to answer you last question....just read my first paragraph. Two vastly different types of airplanes. If you flew the pmdg 737 or 777, you would go to the airbus and immediately know it is a "lite" product.

FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠

Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024

 

 

 

 

 


If you flew the pmdg 737 or 777, you would go to the airbus and immediately know it is a "lite" product.

 

It's the stark difference with what's offered in GA that I was referring to.  It's almost a desert.  Nothing even comes close to what we have in the 737s, 777, 747s, Q400, A3xx, DC10, and even more.  If you do get a Nav system in a GA it'll likely cause a CTD, horrible framerates or both.  If you got a Nav system with the functionality of the Aerosoft A320 in a GA you'd think 'holy crap!...Navigraph too?!...working FLC?!...VNAV?!...great framerates?!...no crashing?!'  It'd be a whole new world.

Gregg Seipp

"A good landing is when you can walk away from the airplane.  A great landing is when you can reuse it."
i9 64GB RAM, GTX-5090

I'll be curious about how it compares to the Aerosoft one.  I'm sure it will be better but in what ways?  Looking forward to reviews.

 

Proper engine/aircraft performance at last!

CASE: Fractal Terra Silver CPU: AMD R5 7800X3D 5.0Ghz RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 GPU: nVidia RTX 4070 Ti SUPER · SSDs: Samsung 990 PRO 2TB M.2 PCIe · PNY XLR8 CS3040 2TB M.2 PCIe · VIDEO: LG-32GK650F QHD 32" 144Hz FREE/G-SYNC · MISC: Thrustmaster TCA Airbus Joystick + Throttle Quadrant · MSFS2024 · Windows 11

It's the stark difference with what's offered in GA that I was referring to.  It's almost a desert.  Nothing even comes close to what we have in the 737s, 777, 747s, Q400, A3xx, DC10, and even more.  If you do get a Nav system in a GA it'll likely cause a CTD, horrible framerates or both.  If you got a Nav system with the functionality of the Aerosoft A320 in a GA you'd think 'holy crap!...Navigraph too?!...working FLC?!...VNAV?!...great framerates?!...no crashing?!'  It'd be a whole new world.

I agree with you! It's startling to see the issues which you just mentioned plague GA airplanes. My biggest gripe is that the developers seem to only concentrate on the exterior and interior visual models the most while sorely sacrificing the systems and fee modelling.

 

I woukd love to have some solid biz jets to the pmdg standard. I'm tired of Caren adds offerings. I gave up on them awhile ago because of seeing all the negative reviews.

FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠

Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024

 

 

 

Great.... I realistically will not expect to see the P3D version until 2017 at the earliest.

Eric 

 

 

I agree with you! It's startling to see the issues which you just mentioned plague GA airplanes. My biggest gripe is that the developers seem to only concentrate on the exterior and interior visual models the most while sorely sacrificing the systems and fee modelling.

 

I woukd love to have some solid biz jets to the pmdg standard. I'm tired of Caren adds offerings. I gave up on them awhile ago because of seeing all the negative reviews.

I stick with GA and biz jet developers that produce high quality realism. A2A. RealAir. Eaglesoft. I have heard good things about FlySimWare. Other developers are eye candy only.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.