4 minutes ago, lwt1971 said:

Oh man isn't that the truth... fresh blood, passion for their work, deep skills, humility, relating to the customer, and new attitudes all the way! Asobo, Working Title, Fenix, FBW, iniBuilds, etc all leading the new guard of devs in the flight sim community.
 

Discord is mandatory in todays simming world. I learn so much checking Discord sites every day, for the add ons I am using. 

9 minutes ago, blueshark747 said:

You're on to something here...

Not entirely sure about that. My folder looks exactly like yours but I have stellar performance. 

6 minutes ago, Swe_Richard said:

Not entirely sure about that. My folder looks exactly like yours but I have stellar performance. 

They do have a point as that folder should have files in it and not just the "work" folder which is part of the problem. But it's not really clear why some people don't have the same performance impact even though those files are missing. 

Edited November 12, 20223 yr by Zangoose

4 hours ago, XCLTM3 said:

The PMDG delivered 15+ FPS/Smoothness in comparison to the A310.

This indicates more optimization work is required (at a minimum).

I would wait until this WASM issue is fixed and compare again, as it could be the one causing the FPS loss.

13 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

I would much rather have terrain, which I use all the time in the Fenix in mountainous approaches, than weather. 

Yeah I'm not sure why the terrain is inop to be fair. Anyone know if there is any aircraft that is on the Xbox that has a working terrain? Wondering if it's related or not. 

Edited November 12, 20223 yr by Zangoose

4 minutes ago, Zangoose said:

But it's not really clear why some people don't have the same performance impact even though those files are missing. 

They could just have good CPUs.

I tried it but < 20 fps was a no go for me. Hopefully they sort it out asap. 

18 minutes ago, Zangoose said:

They do have a point as that folder should have files in it and not just the "work" folder which is part of the problem. But it's not really clear why some people don't have the same performance impact even though those files are missing. 

Yeah, regardless of the issue causing this I hope they can fix it because this is a really nice aircraft.

I have stellar performance also, the A310 performs just as good as the older ironed out default aircraft.

I'm on a 1080ti/8700K 32GB RAM and fly in VR ONLY, with some pretty high settings.

Now of course I wouldn't bother trying to load the A310 in a place like IniScene's KLAX or ORBX's KBUR V2 scenery and expect to make it off of the tarmac smoothly.🤣

Hopefully they release a timely hotfix patch to fix whatever's eating away at the performance across different hardware.

 

Edited November 12, 20223 yr by blueshark747

6 hours ago, guenseli said:

It has started

 

First scripts are made, looking very promising!!!

MCP Bridge as well?

Apparently, they have found the issue. 

All encrypted planes using WASM (like the A310) don't compile correctly. No DLLs are being generated, so it run on intermediary unoptimized code. The people who have ok performance just have very strong CPUs, so the effect is less noticeable. 

PMDG 737 works fine because it's unencrypted, same for the Wright Flyer (both are also WASM planes). 

Edited November 12, 20223 yr by Aaron555

1 hour ago, V1ROTA7E said:

Can you guys look in this folder and see if your plane compiled correctly? @Swe_Richard @blueshark747@Shack95
 

%LOCALAPPDATA%\Packages\Microsoft.FlightSimulator_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalState\packages\microsoft-aircraft-a310-300

 

it should look like this:

I do not have this files it is complete emty, only some in the work folder.

But the plane works fine, no FPS issues, what the..😵🤔

cheers 😏

13 minutes ago, Aaron555 said:

Apparently, they have found the issue. 

All encrypted planes (marketplace) with WASM don't compile correctly. No DLLs are being generated, so it run on intermediary unoptimized code. The people who have ok performance just have very strong CPUs, so the effect is less noticeable. 

PMDG 737 works fine because it's unencrypted, same for the Wright Flyer (both are WASM planes). 

Thank you for reporting this. I've been uninstalling and reinstalling to no avail. Hope a fix will come soon now.

I also cannot import Simbrief flightplans (keeps saying "pending"). We are supposed to use our Simbrief ALIAS, correct? Tried both with alias and user name, but neither worked.

Edited November 12, 20223 yr by Johan217

Overall I find this A310 pretty good and an excellent addition to MSFS, just got some issues getting my Virpil throttle calibrated on the EFB with rev thrust and idle gotta do some research first.

Imported a simbrief plan without navigraph sub and did a 10 hour flight across the pond from KJFK with full traffic and MP, got around 30fps there. during flight at cruise I got 45-50 fps.

taxiing feels good it turns as you would expect.

takeoff is a bit unstable compared to xp11 but it still feels nice, kinda heavy and long roll although I was close to MTOW and at landing, it feels quite smooth and precise, very easy to butter.

Increasing Simrate to 4x seems fine but sometimes/occasionally the auto throttle goes bonkers and locks on full thrust, pressing the athr button again resolves it.

At 8X it follows the path but wobbles up and down by 500-1000feet so I didn’t try 16x,  the PMDG 737 can follow the whole flight plan waypoints at 8X even 16x for me while still being smooth and “on rails”.

But I am pretty happy with this plane, an old Airbus that has similar systems to Boeing is quite unique and I can’t wait for the other variants.

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

21 hours ago, Tuskin38 said:

Simbrief?

FMC -> MENU -> ACARS

Simbrief (In-game using CDU ? MCDU ) import is not working.

The Navigraph Simbrief Log-in using a username on my setup is now my e-mail address and that is not working on the inbuild A310.