1 hour ago, St Mawgan said:

Ah ok. 

Personally I'd say the C750, then the 35A, then the VisionJet then the Honda. 

Lol I'd go C750, C700, Honda, 35A, Vision..... for MSFS.

 

G

Edited July 24, 2025Jul 24 by Gazzareth

size of the engines! insane

no wonder its fast

Found a few snags:

Yes in VR the clickspots on the glareshield are messed up. It's the usual problem with unoptimized VR support, because the mouse cursor is only correctly centered on one of the two eyes and not on the other.

Strangely enough the problem is not noticeable on the tablet.

 

And the sound of the running APU from outside is somehow broken in the way it is rendered. You can still hear it after you have left to the main menu in 2024.

On 7/23/2025 at 10:02 AM, haskell said:

Anyone using it in VR in 2020? I saw some complaints on their Discord (a dumpster fire yesterday) that the click spots didn’t work in VR. That would be a deal breaker for me as I love flying in VR. 

Had to come back and say I bought it and it is AMAZING. Probably the best VR graphics of any plane I own and no click spot issues. Apparently that is a MSFS2024 issue. Only VR issue is no zoom but I can live without that. 

Just a fun plane! Really enjoying it. 

Very smooth aircraft.

A hiccup on my initial flight.

Couldn't get the dash mounted Thrust Reverser buttons to work. Got "Armed" to light up, but "Unlock" & "Deploy" were dead. Any thoughts?

T45

7 minutes ago, Treetops45 said:

Very smooth aircraft.

A hiccup on my initial flight.

Couldn't get the dash mounted Thrust Reverser buttons to work. Got "Armed" to light up, but "Unlock" & "Deploy" were dead. Any thoughts?

T45

You don't need to touch those, just leave in Norm and they should work. Tells you how to set them up in the manual, it depends on your throttle set up as to what method you need to use.

 

G

36 minutes ago, Gazzareth said:

You don't need to touch those, just leave in Norm and they should work. Tells you how to set them up in the manual, it depends on your throttle set up as to what method you need to use.

 

G

Thank you.

Could you clarify whether the buttons do anything or are superfluous?

I have tube liner engine thrust reverse set up on the Keyboard F2 key, but that didn't trigger it for the Citation.

I'll have another look at the Manual.

But you have been able to get the engine  'clam shells' to open?

T45

Edited July 24, 2025Jul 24 by Treetops45

14 minutes ago, Treetops45 said:

Thank you.

Could you clarify whether the buttons do anything or are superfluous?

I have tube liner engine thrust reverse set up on the Keyboard F2 key, but that didn't trigger it for the Citation.

I'll have another look at the Manual.

But you have been able to get the engine  'clam shells' to open?

T45

Pretty sure the settings are Norm and Stow, so upwards will prevent them deploying.

Got them working on mine now, without issue. In my case I needed both Reduce throttle and throttle cut assigned.

G

5 hours ago, EGLD said:

size of the engines! insane

no wonder its fast

Same engines as the 717, on a much smaller airplane.  

1 hour ago, Gazzareth said:

Pretty sure the settings are Norm and Stow, so upwards will prevent them deploying.

Got them working on mine now, without iss

I have reverse thrust set via my Saitek throttle axis (buttons) using FSUIPC assignments in MSFS2020.

Working well.

Is it true that the aircraft was capable of going over Mach 1 but the FAA only allowed it to be rated for .92?

7 minutes ago, Farlis said:

Is it true that the aircraft was capable of going over Mach 1 but the FAA only allowed it to be rated for .92?

As par 91.817  no civilian airplane can fly with speed exceeding mach 1 , but then I don't know if it true for Citation ! Technically if it could fly faster .92 it could do so over say ocean outside contiguous US adiz

7 hours ago, sd_flyer said:

It seems a bit floaty during round up. Also I was flying at FL390 and pitch attitude was a bit flat! I wonder to hear feedback from those who flew similar model. Is that how it is?

 

The test team included participation and feedback from multiple pilots with experience in type.  Included some with deep experience.

32 minutes ago, sd_flyer said:

As par 91.817  no civilian airplane can fly with speed exceeding mach 1 , but then I don't know if it true for Citation ! Technically if it could fly faster .92 it could do so over say ocean outside contiguous US adiz

Concorde was civilian 😉

9 hours ago, blueshark747 said:

 I would rank the C750 4th on my bizjet addon ranking list.

1. Flight FX HJet

2. Flight FX Cirrus Vision Jet

3. FSW Lear 35A

4. FlightFX C750

Can’t wait to see what Just Flight comes up with for the Lear 45!

The Xtreme Prototypes Lear 25 as well!

Exciting times ahead!!!

1, 2, & 4 are very different. Find it difficult to rate them against each other.  In their respective classes each is clearly at the top of my listd. No question.

Edited July 25, 2025Jul 25 by fppilot