September 11, 2025Sep 11 1 hour ago, Farlis said: I really hope they finally find the cause of the deterioating performance when approaching short final or rolling on ground. It doesn't happen always but when it does it ruins everything. I just had a stall on touch down on Vatsim because the framedrops where so bad that I lost all sense of control. This really needs to be fixed! I agree. As I stated in an earlier post, this problem is what keeps sending me back to MSFS 2020. For me, flying the last approximately 500' AGL is never a smooth experience like the rest of the flight and many times severe stutters. zachlog
September 11, 2025Sep 11 45 minutes ago, zachlog said: I agree. As I stated in an earlier post, this problem is what keeps sending me back to MSFS 2020. For me, flying the last approximately 500' AGL is never a smooth experience like the rest of the flight and many times severe stutters. Turn on Dynamic Settings for butter smooth landings. dd
September 11, 2025Sep 11 12 minutes ago, Sky_Pilot071 said: Turn on Dynamic Settings for butter smooth landings. dd Thanks, I will give it a try but I need some additional direction. Currently, Frame Generation is enabled (2X) and Max Rate is set to 40. These settings had a major, positive effect on performance. Before enabling these settings, MSFS 2024 was pretty much unusable. Two questions: Is there a conflict between Frame Generation and Dynamic Settings ? Given the Frame Generation numbers, what Frame Rate Target do I use in Dynamic Settings ? zachlog
September 11, 2025Sep 11 8 hours ago, DAD said: just coming back from a 3 days business trip, updated SU4 beta and fired up 2024. now in the Fenix EDDM-EDDK, veeery smooth. no problems, will even try to dial some sliders up... just one observation which is probably well known by now: the navigraph simbrief addon for the 2024 EFB is broken, isn't it? it does not show anymore in my EFB? Are you talking about native msfs 2024 efb? I don't know but Fenix efb works with simbrief flawlessly. Did you have any problems with brakes when you switch from auto braking to the manual on during landing?
September 11, 2025Sep 11 5 minutes ago, zachlog said: Thanks, I will give it a try but I need some additional direction. Currently, Frame Generation is enabled (2X) and Max Rate is set to 40. These settings had a major, positive effect on performance. Before enabling these settings, MSFS 2024 was pretty much unusable. Two questions: Is there a conflict between Frame Generation and Dynamic Settings ? Given the Frame Generation numbers, what Frame Rate Target do I use in Dynamic Settings ? Dynamic settings simply reduces Levels of Detail to maintain the target frame rate. If you are getting smooth 40 fps as a max frame rate, dynamic settings will make sure (or try to, anyway) to hit that. Frame gen and dynamic settings are two different independent things, they don't affect each other. 9800X3d, 4090, 64 GB DDR5 6000 RAM, 4 TB NVME (2x2), 4K Ultra + Framegen
September 11, 2025Sep 11 14 minutes ago, Vitold69 said: Are you talking about native msfs 2024 efb? I don't know but Fenix efb works with simbrief flawlessly. Did you have any problems with brakes when you switch from auto braking to the manual on during landing? Yes. The simbrief app for the MSFS EFB is broken, but Navigraph devs have already said that Asobo has fixed this in the next beta build (the next one to release). So it should be fixed soon. 9800X3d, 4090, 64 GB DDR5 6000 RAM, 4 TB NVME (2x2), 4K Ultra + Framegen
September 11, 2025Sep 11 17 minutes ago, zachlog said: Thanks, I will give it a try but I need some additional direction. Currently, Frame Generation is enabled (2X) and Max Rate is set to 40. These settings had a major, positive effect on performance. Before enabling these settings, MSFS 2024 was pretty much unusable. Two questions: Is there a conflict between Frame Generation and Dynamic Settings ? Given the Frame Generation numbers, what Frame Rate Target do I use in Dynamic Settings ? Good to go. It is some kind of Asobo magic sauce and I don't use external programs. dd
September 11, 2025Sep 11 3 hours ago, Farlis said: I really hope they finally find the cause of the deterioating performance when approaching short final or rolling on ground. It doesn't happen always but when it does it ruins everything. I just had a stall on touch down on Vatsim because the framedrops where so bad that I lost all sense of control. This really needs to be fixed! Not happening here and hasn't for a long time and that is in the most demanding settings and planes. Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
September 12, 2025Sep 12 Bit out of the loop recently; have they said what the main goals are for this SU? Is it simply performance and miscellaneous? i910900k, RTX 3090, 32GB DDR4 RAM, AW3423DW, Ruddy girt big mug of Yorkshire Tea
September 12, 2025Sep 12 Instead of native Nvidia frame generation, try Nvidia Smooth Motion. It is turned on in the Nvidia app. You must turn FG OFF if SM is ON. I think it's more stable than FG. In a Pimax braded VR headset, they have Smart Smoothing which is sort of like the same thing only it works in VR. It used to cause issues but it now works fine for me. And Meta has ASW which is their version for VR. 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
September 12, 2025Sep 12 1 hour ago, JonathanC said: Dynamic settings simply reduces Levels of Detail to maintain the target frame rate. If you are getting smooth 40 fps as a max frame rate, dynamic settings will make sure (or try to, anyway) to hit that. Frame gen and dynamic settings are two different independent things, they don't affect each other. OK, thanks. I will give it a try. zachlog
September 12, 2025Sep 12 6 hours ago, Vitold69 said: Are you talking about native msfs 2024 efb? I don't know but Fenix efb works with simbrief flawlessly. Did you have any problems with brakes when you switch from auto braking to the manual on during landing? ad 1 this is the Fenix EFB within the msfs2024 EFB, so you can pop up that Fenix EFB via TAB key (if that is the one mapped to the MSFS EFB) ad 2 no, all fine but was just one quick flight so far, more to come today Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
September 12, 2025Sep 12 CPU optimisations are definitely working, visually it's much smoother in VR and FPS seemingly has increased. But the take off/landing issues with tanking performance are still there, not as bad as SU3 but still bad enough to be a major issue. Pico Neo3 Link VR - Windows 11 64bit, Gigabyte Z590 Aorus Elite Mobo, i7-10700KF CPU, Gigabyte RX 9070 XT OC 16gb (AMD GPU), 32gig Corsair 3600mhz RAM, SSD x2 + M.2 SSD 1tb x1 Saitek X45 HOTAS - Saitek Pro Rudder Pedals - Logitech Flight Yoke - Homemade 3 Button & 8-directional Joystick Box, SNES Controller (used as a Button Box - Additional USB Numpad (used as a Button Box)
September 12, 2025Sep 12 52 minutes ago, DAD said: ad 1 this is the Fenix EFB within the msfs2024 EFB, so you can pop up that Fenix EFB via TAB key (if that is the one mapped to the MSFS EFB) now with picture.... Phil Leaven i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, ASUS 4070 12GB EVO, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), Rolling Cache 16GB, Photogrammetry always OFF, Live Weather and Live Traffic always ON, Res 2560x1440 on 27"
September 12, 2025Sep 12 With all due respect, guys.....you should not have to activate Dynamic Settings to maintain a smooth framerate through final approach and touchdown. I do not have that problem in MSFS 2020, and I certainly would not want to reduce image quality/level of detail to solve it. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
Create an account or sign in to comment