Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. McDaniel
    Noel...Sethos... There is help for you both, please consider seeing a therapist, it's obvious both of you are obsessed! Just kidding 😂 I really don't think it needs to get personal, both have a opinion on things and if it works for you so what. No need for a privat war out of my perspective. I personally use the same approach as Noel, for me personally, smoothness is the holy grail, and in msfs2020 I don't feel or see a draw back. Msfs2020 has never been so smooth and performent like these days. Nothing beats the immersion of hand flying a Ils approach into a busy airport without any performance issues. 🥰 Please be nice to each other...at the end it's a hobby. ♥️ McDan out
  3. jcomm
    I never experienced scuh behaviour. But I am also out of FG and back to DX11 since more than 1 month.
  4. jason74
    I always watch a preview flight by by one of the you tubers that get early access that way most first flights go smoothly as they show you stuff like PITCH TRIM switch
  5. Sethos
    You are some piece of work Noel. Every single thread you're in, you shove CapFrameX down the throat of people to a point where it's getting obnoxious. You keep posting your inane results at every chance you get, telling people to download CapFrameX! Do what you did! Everyone else is doing the sim wrong! Your smoothness is objectively better than others! and you simply refuse to let up until you've forced your agenda (remember when you started badgering me in private messages because you couldn't force that on me?). The way you deny a very well-known problem with RTSS. A problem that even the developers of the very software you are using confirms and straight up say; don't use it, because it's not compatible, you flat out ignore because it doesn't conform with the agenda in your head. When someone finally tells you to test something, confirm the results, the very thing you do in every single thread you get the chance, you are brazen enough to say 'Oh I don't need to' when you clearly have no idea what you're actually doing. In the very post you respond to, I say it's not frame render latency and then you, embarrassingly, post a screenshot of frame latency like "Hah, look at how smart I am. I gotchu!". I am completely embarrassed at how technically inept you are, it's clear you don't have any actual interest or knowledge on this subject other than forcing your way of doing things onto people. At this point, I would even question any results you posted, because you have become so hellbent on forcing your agenda, I'd worry you would tamper with them or even lie, that is how little I think of you at this point. And knowing your setup, from the multitude of posts you've made, I know you've spoken of 36FPS being the holy grail, which also tells me you probably can't even feel the 50-60ms of added PC latency and that is why you so vehemently pretend you can't feel it -- Or rather, you really can't feel it, which is worrying, because you've put smoothness above all else. It is clear you have no interest in actually understanding all the aspects what you are doing, have no real broad technical knowledge of what you're messing with, nor any real interest in actually providing people with all the proper information. This has become a neurotic obsession for you and you will fight it tooth and nail to not potentially shatter your little smoothness bubble. And again, I underscore the very amusing part in all of this; the very developers of the software you so desperately cling on to, say RTSS is not compatible and recommend not using it with CapFrameX and Frame Generation. The DEVELOPERS. Yet again, this point does not conform with the world view in your head, you refuse to actually test the claim and just get right back on track of saying how wrong everyone else it and it must clearly be their computers. It's completely tragi-comic But alas, it won't end here. You will, again, refute the claim, not do any relevant tests, post the same completely useless CapFrameX graph for the umpteenth time showing you haven't understood a thing and Noel's CapFrameX circus will continue. Have a fine day Noel and I genuinely feel sorry for all the future unsuspecting individuals who will have to face yet another CapFrameX gospel session from a guy who clearly has no interest in furthering his knowledge on the subject.
  6. wim123
    wow, am i glad i am on the xbox, with all its limitations, but hey no finetuning or whatever. i am too old for that, just flying.
  7. Today
  8. anden145
    I'm really sorry, guys, but I really, really don't understand your incentive to come in here and moan and cry about features which are missing, bugs and general instability and/or misunderstandings in the voice-recognition system etc... they LITTERALY spelled it out for you, when you CHOSE to purchase the software! Please calm down. You wanted it released in Early-Access and it's released as Early-Access, with all the caveats and bugs and missing features that entails. Trust me - I've had games where Early-Access was unplayable. This ACTUALLY does work and you CAN complete a flight with it. Yes there's bugs and it's sometimes hard to hear and reply to the controllers - but come on... Really? It's not as this could come as a surprise. You have a developer, which have been COMPLETELY OPEN to the development process and have warned you, that this software has bugs etc... in more honest words than many other developers have done. Nobody asked you to 'jump' into Early-Access!!! You were given the OPTION of doing so with all the warnings and cautions (even in the actual purchasing process!)... and yet you still come in here and moan and rant about it being unreliable... there's just no winning. Sorry for my rant...
  9. hhbrbg
    Hunted by the „don‘t understand your callsign bug“, I share the disappointment many of you have. From my experience with Pilot2ATC, FSHud, BeyondATC and SayintentionsAI, let me say… Dear developers, without being asked, my advice to you is: Please don‘t even think about controlling other traffic or adding feature after feature if the basics do not work.
  10. jabloomf1230
    The answer is in the official BKSQ FAQs, so I'm guessing that this is a common mistake.
  11. Dermot McClusky
    Good lord, you guys, my comment was DRIPPING w/ sarcasm. I literally spelled out exactly what BATC had done for people who were purchasing it.
  12. anden145
    Indeed there was. In huge letters! Both a 'warning' notice AND a confimration box, that you were understanding the caveats of purhasing and using the software. I assume (and hope) that the above poster was being sarcastic.
  13. nobleord started following BeyondATC Released (EA)
  14. nobleord
    Didn't you read the screens during the purchase process that said essentially that? I can recall at least two screens (prior to actually making the purchase) that warned that the software was early access and to expect bugs. It is also clearly stated on their website.
  15. sultanofswing
    Once again you are showing render latency not system latency. Also looking at your older post's you seem to believe that smoothness and Latency are the same thing. They are not, yes your sim may be smooth but once you turn on Frame Gen you add system latency, it cannot be avoided.
  16. Noel
    Put this in your pipe and smoke it...
  17. Dermot McClusky
    Just flew RJFS to RJFY and it went really smooth. Good vectors into the ILS. I used the auto-reply feature mostly as the Japanese accents are SO strong, it's hard to understand a lot of what they say. Still fun for the immersion, though. Boy, I'm with you! They should have told you outright it would be incomplete and buggy. In fact, they should have had a statement in writing with a giant font and a voice that reads the entire statement out loud telling us it would be buggy and incomplete before we bought it. Why didn't they do anything like that? If they had, I could have chosen to not spend my money on something incomplete and buggy! Like an adult who can make my own decisions! Oh well, if wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak.
  18. sultanofswing
    Frame Gen itself add significant overall system latency, it's factual and cannot be disproven. Luckily MSFS is a very slow paced Simulator so that added system latency is basically un noticeable but in a fast paced First person shooter it is very noticeable.
  19. sloppysmusic
    It's so ubiquitous now I see the airport states 3000ft runway and make a mental note it's actually 2000ft usable. Scared some 🐦🐦🐦🐦in their nests tonight in the B60. Talking of Dukes... I notice that 'coming soon' has arrived twice Capt? 👍 I know what I'm watching with breakfast tomorrow!
  20. JBDB-MD80
    I usually don't comment in threads like this but LVFR left the scenery scene to move on to the development aircraft model scene to make money off the XBOX folks that will buy anything. No more comments here from me but that is the truth. If people wan't to spend their money on addons buy the Black Square Duke and get what you pay for and do some G.A. flying.
  21. Keirtt
    Typical LVFR…. I’ll say it until I’m blue in the face, their sceneries weren’t stellar, but that’s what they should’ve stuck with.
  22. RC36
    This was my first plane that I purchase from LatinVFR and the chances are it will be my last. The cockpit textures are just abismal,Toliss planes have actually better textures,this A340 textures it’s not for MFS standard by any means. Trying to flare this plane is a nightmare,the moment the AP gets disconnected the plane is to sensitive and then just floats down the runway then just plumbs to the runway. It’s just a complete dogs breakfast. I would have more respect for the developer if he was to say this thing was in Early Acess then releasing it not even half baked!
  23. UrgentSiesta
    Looks GREAT. https://store.x-plane.org/AW-109-SP_p_1891.html
  24. Tva
    Some problems I have after 10 flights or so. - I really really dont like that I cant ask for a different runway or different aproach . I thought that wont be a problem but it really is. And I dont understant why, even the default ATC let you chose those if you really want. - If I try to request engine start and only engine start I`m getting a cleared to align or backtrack the runway, I have no idea why. -When its asking you to call when ready to descent and you confirm will call when ready to descent the AI will interpret that you are ready to descent and give you a lower altitude. On the same note, if you asked by mistake (like me pressing first option when in climb) for descent the whole flight is bricked. I was 500 miles away of my destination in climb and asked for descent. From there all I was getting was a heading and a lower altitude. Had to fly offline rest of the way. -you ask for descent once and thats it. You cant ask again even if you are at the asigned altitude, you need to wait until you get further descent even if that is way late. -I got a visual approach and because I couldnt find the airport fast the ATC activated missed approach and even if by then I had runway in sight and was ready to land I couldnt tell that and had to go around. -Some of the time is a really good idea to omit saying your callsign. If I`m getting a new frequency just saying my callsign at the end lower the chance of being understood by 50%. If I readback only the frequency no problem almost every time. I`m kinda dissapointed because I feel that the state of the program now is in no way ready to launch. And I`m only speaking about the IFR part not traffic. IFR aproach has maybe a 50% chance of going okey and they said that part is mostly done and in 2-4 months will have traffic. Yeah, not gonna happen. Maybe in a year will have traffic if they will fix the current problems with approach and vectoring. I`m almost certain that they run out of money and they need to lauch something asap whatever the state. The poll was only to have an excuse when people will complain about the multiple bugs and missing features.
  25. markmasterson
    Thank you for the well laid out suggestion For Twenty6. I mistyped I meant to type version 0.9.28+patch1...Thank you for pointing that out
  26. Andrew2448
    Minor Update 1.0.26.EA - Added Upgrade to Supporter's Pack option for anyone that has the base product and wishes to upgrade for only half the price. - Added ability to call established on an ILS approach. - Added the active runway as a UI info box to IFR clearances, even if it is procedure not to speak the active departure runway in the clearance. - Continued fixes for speech regcognition with a focus on "Runway Niner Right" and "Niner". - Many voice tweaks; added more Premium Voices. - Added new auto-Respond Character AUS Male. - Fix for a crash entering the options menu. - More fixes for crashes when binding buttons from a non-US keyboard.
  27. jstnj
    Nice. Thanks Mark. That was extremely easy with the included documentation.
  28. fs4fun
    Since OP mentioned TTools, there is also AI Flight Planner, you can download it from fsdeveloper
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...