May 13, 20215 yr No Thanks. Got these promises in every other sim to enhance scenery and ended up spending a lot of money between FSX and P3D. Pilots Mesh, et all. And now these sims are in the rear view mirror. This scenery out of the box for MSFS looks fine to me, so no more will I go down that garden path known as add on mesh, scenery, airports, whatever.
May 13, 20215 yr 7 minutes ago, skipph said: This scenery out of the box for MSFS looks fine to me Meshwise that couldn't be farther from the truth.
May 13, 20215 yr The thing is, about the differing points of view on this... If you don't want it and are happy with the default mesh, fine! It is purely optional to buy it. Likewise, if you don't mind spending a few quid occasionally like me, just out of interest to see what it is like, fine also. There are too many arguments or disagreements between simmers on these type of things that are mainly subjective, and it is a waste of time and breath, especially when there is a payware A-4 Skyhawk out there that we can all agree on! 😆 Rob (but call me Bob or Rob, I don't mind). I like to trick airline passengers into thinking I have my own swimming pool in my back yard by painting a large blue rectangle on my patio. Intel 14900K in a Z790 motherboard with water cooling, RTX 4080, 32 GB 6000 CL30 DDR5 RAM, W11 and MSFS on Samsung 980 Pro NVME SSD's. Core Isolation Off, Game Mode Off.
May 13, 20215 yr Have to agree, there is no right or wrong. I love payed addon airports some think its a waste of money. Each to there own. No right no wrong. David Murden. MSFS • Fenix A320 • PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi • FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet • • Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF • Flightsim.to • DCS • A10c II • F-16c • F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier • Terrains = • Nevada NTTR • Persian Gulf • Syria • Marianas • • [email protected] All Cores HT ON • 32GB DDR4 3200MHz • RTX 3080 • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos® • Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip •
May 13, 20215 yr I think there is no breatthaking difference so i don't belive it makes mutch sense.. cheers 😉 08.2024 new PC is online : ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F GAMING WIFI Mainboard, AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X3D Prozessor, G.Skill DIMM 64 GB DDR5-6000 (2x 32 GB) Dual-Kit, MSI GeForce RTX 4090 VENTUS 3X E 24G OC Grafikkarte, 2x WD Black SN850X NVMe SSD 4 TB - Drive C+D, WD Gold Enterprise Class 12 TB for storage HDD, Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 1000W PC - Power supply, Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU Aircooler with 7 Heatpipes, Design Meshify 2 White TG Clear Tint Tower-Case, 3x 4K monitors 2x32 Samsung 1x27 LG 3840x2160, Windows11 Prof. 23H2 - now Windows11 Prof. 25H2 Flightsimulator Hardware: Honeycomb Throttle Bravo, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro, Logitech Flight Joke System, XBox Controller, some Thrustmaster stuff, Winwing CDU Panels.
May 13, 20215 yr 4 hours ago, Farlis said: Meshwise that couldn't be farther from the truth. It depends on what you're doing. For people only flying high altitude flights where you really don't need to see that kinda of detail it's mostly fine. But yes, if you're doing low altitude sight seeing flights, it could be better. But they're improving countries as they get to them (where possible) Edited May 13, 20215 yr by Tuskin38
May 13, 20215 yr In MSFS 2020 I pretty much exclusively fly around New Zealand in GA at 3 - 9,000 feet or so, and only in VR. For me this add-on is the icing on the cake, and improves the graphics in a subtle but noticeable way. For me it's worth the money and I'm happy I bought it. If they can deliver on the LIDAR 1m promise then that would be incredible.
May 14, 20215 yr Airport elevations are my only concern. Historically, when you apply a "better" mesh than default, about 50% of airports are either on stilts or in a pit. Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700F CPU @ 2.90GHz (8 cores) Hyper on, Evga RTX 3060 12 Gig, 32 GB ram, Windows 11, P3D v6, and MSFS 2020 and a couple of SSD's
May 14, 20215 yr I think the history some many here coming from the default garbage coming out of FSX/P3D, and the dire need to improve it, they just have a hard time accepting the current doll really hardly needs dressed up at all. Wake me up if someone does true Lidar grade mesh resolution on a per continent basis including all runways in affected areas I might consider jumping the gun. I think Asobo will do it themselves as on no uncertain terms they are clearly dedicated to high grade scenery and visuals, of which mesh definitely is a part of that. OTOH, only certain areas really need Lidar grade mesh. Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
May 14, 20215 yr Now we just need Orbx releasing a MFS TrueEarth scenery for where the Bing imagery is crappy and the circle will be closed. Looking back to the future. <sigh>. Dominique Simming since 1981 - [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam
May 14, 20215 yr It's the consumers money. They can spend it on whatever makes them happy. At least it is offered for those that want it. Offer it all 3rd party developers. We will decide if we want it or not. If we buy your product and it is good we will pass the word, we will also do so if it is really bad. Of course good and bad depends on the consumer too. Everyone thinks different. What's good for some is bad for others, and the other way around too. "Coffee, if your not shaking, you need another cup" Flight Sim Break Discord Channel: https://discord.com/invite/fCV62Ka2QZ
May 14, 20215 yr We (people who thinks like me) are tired of addons, etc. We were exited for MSFS to be a sim with very little addons. Maybe some pro airliners or GA. From the ads, we were promised to have most of them natively. (such as weather, scenery, mesh, AI traffic, airports, ground services,atc, etc.working properly and developing by the time.) Asobo/MS must do the improvements in house and we can get these with the updates. Of course, firstly the required updates of the sim, is needed. I mentioned this before and I can repeat again. I think, Asobo/MS have another priority (maybe XBOX or whatever) but they did not make the simple improvements that they they could do easiliy, where community modders (most of them are not professionals) did quite well (seasons, airport enhencements, etc...) We are expecting Asobo/MS to pay more attention to the product they sold with promises. Edited May 14, 20215 yr by kt069 Intel i7-9700K - AMD 7900 XT (VRAM 20GB) - 32 Gb Ram - SSD Drive - Win10 x64 - Samsung 43" 4K TV - Quest 3 VR
May 14, 20215 yr If I were to fly in NZ I would definitely buy this, I think it looks fantastic, the difference is huge in my eyes. System: I ASRock X670E | AMD 7800X3D | 64Gb DDR5 6000 | RTX 4090 | 2TB NVMe | Seasonic Vertex 1000W I LG Ultra Gear 34 UW I
May 14, 20215 yr 14 minutes ago, kt069 said: We are tired of addons, etc. We were exited for MSFS to be a sim with very little addons. We does include me ... - Harry 9800x3D (Strix x870e-E) - 64GB RAM (DDR5 6000, CL 30) - RTX 5090, 34'' 1440p OLED HDR - Windows 11 Pro (1TB M.2) - MSFS 2024 (MS Store, 4TB M.2).
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.