December 11, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, BrammyH said: I've had good luck moving the date forward and getting live weather. For example, if I set the date to December 12 (tomorrow), and pick a time I get the today's live weather. If that makes any sense. Yes you get the live weather from the *hour* of the in-sim time. So there's the 24 hours of weather and you'll just get the hour of it. So if you now set 20th January 2025 2200 UTC, you'll get yesterday 2200 UTC for the weather (because that's the most recent 2200 UTC). For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
December 11, 20241 yr 5 hours ago, CBass said: It should update automatically on Steam! Thanks - realized that so I deleted my message
December 11, 20241 yr 46 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said: And no, I fly real scheduled flights and if the flight is scheduled to be 2 hours in the future, I will use that time in-sim. Do I have to understand why you not simply fly a real world schedule that is in the past and set the sim time to that time instead? Like I do with the freight ops now because I have absolutely no intention of staying up all night to fly a 3'o Clock flight from Leipzig to Paris. So I just do it the next day with the sim set to the time and weather it was when the real flight took place. Why would anyone want to sim a flight that has not even taken place yet, if there is no weather data for this. Edited December 11, 20241 yr by Farlis
December 11, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said: Yes you get the live weather from the *hour* of the in-sim time. So there's the 24 hours of weather and you'll just get the hour of it. So if you now set 20th January 2025 2200 UTC, you'll get yesterday 2200 UTC for the weather (because that's the most recent 2200 UTC). I just created a “wishlist” topic on the official forums to make the use of historical weather optional, not mandatory. That would solve the problem if they make that change. Jim BarrettLicensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.
December 11, 20241 yr 10 hours ago, St Mawgan said: I was hoping to be able to disable most of the default aircraft. No joy. Ha, worked out how to do it with the help of someone in the other forum. Goodbye 90% of my aircraft 🙂 And would you like to share the link where this was detailed? Found your answer in another reply in this thread... please ignore this message. My apologies. https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/can-we-please-have-the-option-to-disable-default-aircraft/684680/4 Edited December 11, 20241 yr by salasnet flightsim.to - map
December 11, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, salasnet said: And would you like to share the link where this was detailed? I have done so, twice in this thread already 😉 9950X3D - X870E Aorus Master- TUF 5090 OC - 64GB DDR5 - 1500W HXi - Titan 360 RX LCD - 9100 Pro x 2 - LG 45GX950A - HOTAS Warthog with Ava Base
December 11, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Farlis said: Do I have to understand why you not simply fly a real world schedule that is in the past and set the sim time to that time instead? Like I do with the freight ops now because I have absolutely no intention of staying up all night to fly a 3'o Clock flight from Leipzig to Paris. So I just do it the next day with the sim set to the time and weather it was when the real flight took place. Why would anyone want to sim a flight that has not even taken place yet, if there is no weather data for this. E.g. there's vatsim event and the airports I want to fly between only have a flight that departs at 2100 UTC. I couldn't use yesterday's flight because I need live weather for Vatsim. For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
December 11, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, Dusk said: Most cities look great from 1000ft+, but with a helicopter at 200ft things fall apart quickly. Third party normally are far superior. Helipad in London. "no comparison with 2020" 😄
December 11, 20241 yr 57 minutes ago, Simon_C said: Please at least get the man's name correctly when criticising hard, Jorg Neumann. 😞 Is he actually Jörg not just Jorg? Anyway who cares?
December 11, 20241 yr They have said that they will bring an option to disable the live weather coupling. it’s funny because in 2020, this was one of the most upvoted items. And now that they responded, everyone wants the old way back! 9800X3d, 4090, 64 GB DDR5 6000 RAM, 4 TB NVME (2x2), 4K Ultra + Framegen
December 11, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, Vitold69 said: Is he actually Jörg not just Jorg? Anyway who cares? How would you like it if people kept calling you by the wrong name?
December 11, 20241 yr Hi, everyone, Since 1.2.7.0 patch, I can't keep my graphics settings anymore. Every time I start the sim the graphic settings changes to minimum! Anyone with the same issue? Greetings
December 11, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, JonathanC said: everyone wants the old way back! Sounds like the start of a joke… Simmers just don’t like what they have, they want what they don’t have!
December 11, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, LRBS said: Unfortunately, MSFS2024, in its current state, even after this update, is in jeopardy with Jorg Neumann and his programmers at the wheel. Something has to give. It is obvious that people are willing to spend the money, and they like the idea of this software very much, but what the ASOBO team does is beyond gross negligence. Even MSFS2020 has its bugs, but this MSFS2024 is something very "special" with so many. It is so upsetting to see so many problems, especially after four years of a very similar "engine" as it is in MSFS2020. It is really very tiring to hear the same broken statements we heard with the 2020: "give them time, they will fix it, they had to meet a deadline, etc." It's about time for them to snap out of this mentality, make swift positive changes, and stop this money grab. ive said for 15 years when captainsim and airsimmer started pay to beta back in the late 2000's, and then were followed by blackbox amd then nearly every other dev with names such as "prologue" or "advanced" etc etc, it just started the catalyst for the standard of addons to drop. This community wanted "pay to beta", they paid for it with their hard earned cash, they embraced it and then shot down anyone on forums that were against it, like this one. The devs have given the community want they wanted. You reap what you sow, we have noone to blame but ourselves. The devs are just playing the market.
December 11, 20241 yr 16 hours ago, kakihara123 said: Yeah totally disappointed that they fixed none of the really game breaking stuff in VR. What is game breaking in VR. I have used VR extensively and can't find anything that is "game breaking". There are some issues for sure but nothing rises to the level of what I would call Game Breaking!
Create an account or sign in to comment