9 minutes ago, bennyboy75 said:

Might stick with it for longer….

Sounds like you should. 

Without FSUIPC both pc’s load into the scenery.

As I need FSUIPC I will wait for the next beta update. 

Edited June 29, 2025Jun 29 by GSalden

I've been flying the default Asobo Cirrus Vision Jet almost exclusively and have encountered 0 issues. 

The only two - not gamebreaking - issues I encountered with the two last versions of the beta are:

- UI handlebar mod must be disabled for the handlebar to show
- For some reason in this beta "edits" to the handlebar, i.e., removing items, do not save from one session to the next. 

Finally, the latest beta release deleted my camera assignments for the Vision Jet. Took me all of 5 minutes to redo them. 

Performance is much improved. Loading from world map to the airport is lightning fast. 

If you fly the Vision Jet, I recommend Tim Morgan's channel on youtube:

Tim Morgan's Vision Jet Tutorials

2 hours ago, Ricardo41 said:

I've been flying the default Asobo Cirrus Vision Jet almost exclusively and have encountered 0 issues. 

 

I have been doing exactly the same and as you mentioned is super fast and performance is great...but with this build you can't really test with add-ons because it will not work so nobody knows if how the performance would be under heavy load and with complex aircraft.

We also have an issue with autogen buildings colors, or the lack of to put it in the right way.

but it is true, vanilla MSFS is extremely good right now.

People are getting way too upset over a beta.

This is exactly why they have betas, so something like this doesn’t go live.

Edited June 29, 2025Jun 29 by Tuskin38

21 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

People are getting way too upset over a beta.

This is exactly why they have betas, so something like this doesn’t go live.

But as presidents and platinum tier members of the Asobo haters club, their indignation is expected, and as always amusing 🙂 Expecting to use interim beta drivers as early access drivers, thinking beta drivers entail some sort of "contract" with the end user, etc etc is all expected from these clueless minority of whiners who actually (and adorably) think they are a significant voice in the community.. a group that is anything but a smidgen of a blip in the total user base for Asobo, a majority of which actually test betas knowing for what they are and actually provide useful feedback.

Edited June 29, 2025Jun 29 by lwt1971

20 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

This is exactly why they have betas, so something like this doesn’t go live.

Problem is, it's not how it works with Asobo/MS. 

Remember msfs2024 release? 

(dev version was out short before and they got countless warnings) 

 

Remember SU2? 

(also countless reports about stutters while landing) 

 

I have not a problem with all that drama. What I'm afraid about is, the lack of communication. I fear, they have outsourced some parts and do not have a clue what's really going on or how to fix things. 

Otherwise they could be much more transparent and communicative. 

At least, outsourcing began already as they let standard planes develop by 3rd party. Now whe have most of the much to much standard planes with bugs leftover which will be probably never get fixed. Nobody cares any more. 

That is what I fear with the current state of development: 

things get out of control, nobody can fix it, because too many companies are involved and in the end, MS shuts down Flightsim again. 

 

However, everything pure speculation (or my worst fears regarding flight simulation) 

55 minutes ago, ttbq1 said:

I have been doing exactly the same and as you mentioned is super fast and performance is great...but with this build you can't really test with add-ons because it will not work

I am trying to run MSFS 2024 as vanilla as possible, with only a small number of addons. 

I haven't used simbrief in months, cancelled my Navigraph subscription, and recently deleted BATC.

Haven't bought one single addon plane, developers seem to be releasing mostly jalopy rust buckets, or half-baked planes I don't have the time to fly anyways. 

Years ago, I would have been excited at the prospect of a Citation X, now planes like these only elicit a "meh" reaction from me. 

Airports: mostly freeware from flightsim.to. 

I'm waiting for a developer to release a long range biz jet - 4000+ miles, with a modern glass cockpit. I suspect I'll be waiting a long time. There is the Embraer Praetor, though....

1 hour ago, guenseli said:

Remember SU2? 

(also countless reports about stutters while landing) 

Yes they released that mess to the public even though they were fully aware of the issues, I'd suggest to Asobo they take a hard look at how other gaming companies run beta periods so they can learn how to do them properly.

There are two types of simmers. Serious simmers and simmers flying on default rattling stools. The latter are happy with everything in 1.5.10.0 ❤️

12 minutes ago, Vitold69 said:

There are two types of simmers. Serious simmers and simmers flying on default rattling stools. The latter are happy with everything in 1.5.10.0 ❤️

What's a serious simmer?🤔

14 minutes ago, Vitold69 said:

There are two types of simmers. Serious simmers and simmers flying on default rattling stools. The latter are happy with everything in 1.5.10.0 ❤️

Oh there is one more type. I would get a lifetime ban if I gave them their rightful name here 🍆

1.5.10.0 is probably the flighting of any MSFS (20 and 24) SU that gave me the biggest insight into aspects of MSFS (2024 in this case) that I was missing....

Well, it wasn't actually just the SU3 flightings, because I started to enjoy some of the default aircraft and flying them more often after SU3 started, and also decided to stay only with the default ATC and AI Traffic, but since 1.5.10.0 was released and the aircraft I kept using in cycle became problematic, causing CTD whenever I tried to load a flight with them ( PMDG 777-300, iFly 737 MAX and FSLabs 321 CEO ) I started playing with the IniBuilds 350, now the ULR variant too, the Fenix 320 CEO, but also a couple gliders and weather themes as well as "Legacy Load & Balance"...

In these gliders and ith the weather presets, the very nice Lx9070 navigator, the Haw Vario (not 100% but very acceptably represented) I have been having the best time of my life doing soaring in MSFS 2024, honestly better, all taken into consideration, than in other platforms including Condorsoaring which is great but lacks the details of scenery I get from MSFS like from no other flight simulator presently available...

Should these CTDs caused apparently by some quirks with SimConnect not have plagued my sim sessions and I would probably still be in the same cycle of loading the same airliner for a short / medium hop, close the sim and return the next slot I had available for simming to do exactly the same.

Kudos! to the 1.5.10.0 flighting CTDs 🙂

Ah! and BTW, here's one of the gliders that works just great with 1.5.10.0:

Is this the BEST GLIDER in MSFS yet? // AS 33 Me by Got Friends

 

 

Edited June 29, 2025Jun 29 by jcomm

Anyone else think that the term "flighting" is pathetic? I thought "deliverables" was bad, but this one takes the crown.

Edited June 29, 2025Jun 29 by Christopher Low

19 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

Anyone else think that the term "flighting" is pathetic? 

Yes, that's why it is also appropriate 😄