July 24, 20223 yr Hi, Since I don't like flying the fenix on my 27" monitor. Font size is too small, so I need to zoom it closely, but when I do that I am missing quite a bit of the world outside, which is annoying while approch/landing. What monitor size is best to getting rid of this issue? 32" or 34" and which ratio 21:9 or 16:9? I think 16:9 would solve the problem because it more streched in the heigh than leight, but would a 34" 21:9 would do the same job? What is the overall best experience?
July 24, 20223 yr I use a 32" Acer Predator monitor with a Trackir head tracking device on the top rail. Has worked for me since FSX and I am still enjoying that combo. John Rig: Gigabyte B550 AORUS Master Motherboard, AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT CPU, 32GB DDR4 Ram, Gigabyte RTX 2070 Super Graphics, Samsung Odyssey wide view display (5120 x 1440 pixels) with VSYNC on.
July 24, 20223 yr I use a 65" 4K TV in Gamemode, but I have in switched in Windows to 21:9 Ratio and the same in MSFS. It has black fields on top and below therefore, but I want the widescreen ratio. 32" sounds rather small to me, although I reckon not everybody has enough space for a large screen. my African sceneries for MSFS : https://darshonaut.blogspot.com/p/msfs-2020.html
July 24, 20223 yr If you are looking for bigger fonts, I would stay with a 16:9 ratio monitor but with the same resolution as what you have on your 27". For comparison, I have both a 34" 21:9 monitor and a 27" 16:9 monitor side by side (both 1440p) and the screen height is identical for both. This means that the font size on my 34" monitor is not larger than my 27" monitor. They are the same size. Normand Intel i7 14700K @ 5.6 GHz / Asus ROG STRIX Z790E Wi-Fi / 64GB DDR5 6400 MHz / MSI RTX 4080 / PSU 1000 Watt / FS2020+FS2024 / Windows 11
July 24, 20223 yr 51 minutes ago, yellowjack said: I use a 32" Acer Predator monitor with a Trackir head tracking device on the top rail. Has worked for me since FSX and I am still enjoying that combo. I do the same thing with Track IR, need close up on panel, move head closer like in real life. Edited July 24, 20223 yr by Bobsk8
July 24, 20223 yr I got a 32" Dell Monitor 16:9 ration and has been fine with me. All depends how much room you are talking about.t. 10700kf, 3080 nividia, 32gbs 3400mhz, 1,000 watts power, M.2 DVMe !tb, boot, 1tb 7200rpm, storage, windows 10 home
July 25, 20223 yr I have a 43 inch 4K TV 16:9 and find that the sweet spot, I did try a 55 inch 1080P LED TV for size before I settled on my current TV but it wasn’t a comfortable experience, just too big for me. Edited July 25, 20223 yr by RJC68 Richard i7-12700K | Noctua NH-D15S Black Version | MSI Pro Z690 - A | 32 GB DDR4 3600 | Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090 | 1TB WD Blue NMVe (MSFS 2020) | 500 GB WD Black Gen 4 NVMe | 4TB WD Black Conventional | Fractal Design Torrent Case | Seasonic 1000W Gold Plus PSU | Thrustmaster Boeing Yoke | Honeycomb Throttle | Airbus Side Stick | Virpil Rudder Pedals | Sony X90K 55 Inch TV |
July 25, 20223 yr I spent yesterday scoping out for a new monitor, so have an opinion in mind. In other words I'm sort of spent yesterday wondering and doing the same as the OP. A ratio wider than 16x9 will not make the numbers bigger. I would stay with 16x9 ratio unless you just want to see more in the same view. The biggest screen among popular 16x9 monitors that I found yesterday was 38.5" (they call it a '40'). It's a 1400p 16x9 monitor. https://www.amazon.com/Sceptre-Curved-Class-DisplayPort-C408B-QWN168W/ It is about $100 cheaper on Amazon than elsewhere. Its $630 on Newegg for instance. typical 32" 16x9 is 28.5" wide x 17" tall Sceptre '40' 16x9 is 34.6"x 20.2" ================ But a 32" monitor is still much bigger than a 27" for sure. And a 32" 1440p will have clearer images (pixels per square inch) than a 38.5" 1400p. But on the other hand the bigger screen will have larger images. I am thinking of going with a 32" 1440p for a clearer image. I'm down to these two: Amazon has a low price than anywhere on this one (has a QD dot pixels).https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09GWD6TWX/ =================== According to the camel, the current Amazon price or $435 is a steal... https://camelcamelcamel.com/product/B09GWD6TWX Edited July 25, 20223 yr by Fielder 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR.
July 25, 20223 yr Dell 3415 34” ultra sharp. 34xx X 14xx res. Had it for 5+ years. XP11, P3d, MSFS…..works well on them all.
July 25, 20223 yr Since I changed my 16:9 / 2K / 27" with a 21:9 / WQHD / 34" I am enjoying a full cockpit view + some lateral view of the scenery, whereas before it was always a compromise between cockpit and outside view. The 3440x1440 resolution is adequate and not as taxing as 4K. I never tried a 32:9 49" such as the Samsung G9, I guess it's spectacular and the closest thing to having 3 monitors. In my opinion ultrawide is the way to go. 7800X3D | 2x32 GB DDR5-6000 CL32 | RTX 5080 | Alienware OLED 34" | 1 Gbps fiber
July 25, 20223 yr I’d look into the LG OLED 42” if budget and space allows for it. OLED for the exceptional image quality, with both Freesync, G-Sync, 120Hz, 4K and HDR. With Dolby Vision and Atmos it’s also great for watching movies 🍿 https://www.microcenter.com/product/647933/lg-oled42c2pua-42-class-(421-diag)-4k-ultra-hd-smart-oled-tv EDIT: the Microcenter page is confusing as it mentions both 42” and 48”. Edited July 25, 20223 yr by Cpt_Piett 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
July 25, 20223 yr 18 hours ago, 737_800 said: 34" 21:9 would do the same job? I've used a 34" 21:9 curved Dell for many years now and love both the curve, and the ultra wide display, at 3440x1440. To me this aspect ratio and curve matches sitting in a plane cockpit better than a flat screen just think about it, requiring you to turn your head to see both lateral extremes, and so forth. Here's an important consideration for all of those folks nudging towards looking at very big displays: you get literally nothing more from this because you simply have to sit farther away from it the larger it is. If you sit closer, pixel pitch comes into play on giant screens. If you need to sit farther away for ergonomic reasons that's a different story of course. So ideally you want smallest pixel pitch from a viewing distance you're going to be at. I'm at 24-30" from eyes to screen w/ my 34" display. Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
July 25, 20223 yr 38 inch widescreen is a nice size as well. Also a 40-43 inch 4K TV works well. Matt Wilson
July 25, 20223 yr I prefer the 21:9 format. It gives a little more peripheral vision without turning your head. This especially helps during the flare and improves overall immersion IMO. I do use Track IR as well. Martin Sims: MSFS 2020, MSFS 2024 and X-plane 11 Home Airport: CYCW - Chilliwack, BC Canada i5 13600KF 32GB DDR4 3600 RAM, RTX3080TI Meta Quest 3
July 25, 20223 yr Can someone recommend a Gsync compatible TV? I see the Thin IQ series is Gsync. I have a 3080 going to pair it to. Chris Chiozza
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.