3 hours ago, Greazer said:

There has never been a plausible explanation as to why the flag was waving but there's no wind on the moon.

Good grief, it's been explained countless times.

13 minutes ago, PlumCrazy said:

 Do we have reason to think airports built specifically for 2024 will not work in 2020?

Geez I would not want to be one of the ones crazy enough to find out. They have said MS2024 only in which implies its for MS2024 only. I'm still on 2020 but I'm not going to try that.

Edited May 1, 20251 yr by JBDB-MD80

23 minutes ago, Christopher Low said:

...and yet others Like MK Studios are happily releasing MSFS 2020 versions of their new airports?

Yeah and others even still release stuff for P3D, so what? 

18 minutes ago, PlumCrazy said:

All this talk about Inibuilds no longer building airports for MSFS2024...  In my experience the VAST majority (99.x%) of airports built specifically for 2020 work just fine in 2024.  Do we have reason to think airports built specifically for 2024 will not work in 2020?

 Different LOD techniques and greater texture resolution seem to be two '24 differentiators. 

Not sure those features are backwards compatible as ini also couldn't use the new LOD system in the 350 in 2020... 

So I don't "believe" 24 airports will work in 2020 despite most 2020 airports working in 2024.  

Edited May 1, 20251 yr by psolk

1 hour ago, psolk said:

How does he make all those ridiculous videos like the 198mph crosswind on the runway without the sim

That's not Greazer. He's not that technically advanced.

As usual with these sort of threads; it becomes an examination of the human condition = the cup is half full, the cup is half empty or I haven't actually got my hands on the cup but I don't want to feel I'm missing out on anything.

22 minutes ago, DD_Arthur said:

That's not Greazer. He's not that technically advanced.

As usual with these sort of threads; it becomes an examination of the human condition = the cup is half full, the cup is half empty or I haven't actually got my hands on the cup but I don't want to feel I'm missing out on anything.

I'd say then,that Greazer is just staring at a half empty cup.

Jase

Imagine picking on somebody because you don’t agree with his point of view. You’re like school ground bullies. 

38 minutes ago, DD_Arthur said:

That's not Greazer. He's not that technically advanced.

As usual with these sort of threads; it becomes an examination of the human condition = the cup is half full, the cup is half empty or I haven't actually got my hands on the cup but I don't want to feel I'm missing out on anything.

Then whose videos does he use to demonstrate his points?  He seems to be able to produce them on demand to prove a point and I can't comment on his technical prowess but he seems more than capable. 

Edited May 1, 20251 yr by psolk

20 minutes ago, Ianrivaldosmith said:

Imagine picking on somebody because you don’t agree with his point of view. You’re like school ground bullies. 

Oh please stop, it is not about "agreeing or disagreeing with point of view". There is no "point of view" in regard of scientifically proven facts. This is one of the todays idiocracies in internet forums etc, each and every no-brainer has an opinion or a "point of view". Prior to the internet time, such people would have arrived with their "point of view" e.g. in the local pub and the reaction would have been million times stronger than what you can read nowadays in a forum. 

4 minutes ago, AnkH said:

Prior to the internet time, such people would have arrived with their "point of view" e.g. in the local pub and the reaction would have been million times stronger than what you can read nowadays in a forum. 

I miss those days. 

33 minutes ago, Ianrivaldosmith said:

Imagine picking on somebody because you don’t agree with his point of view. You’re like school ground bullies. 

It is genuinely crazy the mental gymnastics to defend someone who by all definitions is a troll, under the guise of them having a differing opinion.

You and many others can rationally discuss you're differing opinions on FS24 and I have no issue with that but, to come to the defense of @Greazer of all people? Wow, comical.

 

I mean is this really someone you figure is going to come here and discuss in good faith?

Since I fly only 2020,it is totally stable except for the small bug that the latest Asobo update caused, (the shut down bug). What bothers me is when I see an update of any program that states it is 2020-2024 compatible. I do not install it, not going to screw up my perfectly running 2020. 

14 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

 not going to screw up my perfectly running 2020. 

Bet we could find a similar post of yours some years back around the release of MSFS2020 but with «perfectly running P3D/FSX»...

5 minutes ago, AnkH said:

Bet we could find a similar post of yours some years back around the release of MSFS2020 but with «perfectly running P3D/FSX»...

Go look for it, that should take you forever. Nice try, though.  😉 And by the way, when you quote me don't edit  the quote before quoting me,trying to prove some ridiculous point you are trying to make.  

Edited May 1, 20251 yr by Bobsk8