jhaley101

I'm still addicted to Kennedy Approach. it's installed on my PC and still playing it a ton in 2024. I never was able to get my career salary very high, but now that I can save successfully, I'm loving it. Play mostly Chicago area. Steam offers something similar too.

Thanks, appreciate the quick response! JH

Hi, I'm somewhat new to RT. I have purchased a couple of licenses in the past. I'm considering the pro license, but as its costly, I want to make sure about what I'm reading. I read section 9.3 of the manual regarding "Learn Destination". A snapshot file is immediately used by PSXT to to set up the destination airport with live parked aircraft from the last four hours. With the regular license, PSXT will park static aircraft and live aircraft at the airport. So with the pro license you get 4 hours of data involving live parked aircraft, with the regular license - it's just a snapshot of existing Real traffic around the time you are landing? I know there are other features with the pro license, but as far as learning is concerned, is that the biggest difference between the two? Thanks for this great program! JH

Taking us off the thread topic, but same concern applies. Free Mesh 2.0: "If you were to use FreeMeshX without the use of a third-party solution to update the vectors, conflicts may emerge. This may result in the topography of any updated terrain to sit at different elevation levels, ruining the spectacle. This could see issues like immersion-breaking water bodies and/or airports that are excessively sunken/raised."

It is a worldwide mesh program. It does significantly impove vanilla terrain quality, but as Dave alluded to in the post before your own, what cost is there in terms of elevation problems in other areas, the biggest in my mind is airports. A swiss developer of Canadian sceneries in v5 warned users that setting mesh settings too high can significantly interfere with elevations at airports and sloped runways. Super update as far as mountains go, but I'd be wary about changing everything globally and how that may mess with specific airports. I simply don't have the experience with v6, but if v5 is a comparable, its worthy of trying to obtain details from the developer. You may be able to turn off certain continents if I can remember how the install works, but thats hardly ideal. John

It's worldwide mesh. It's not small. It will take some time to download, but that's hardly a hassle. Previous versions have all been quality work. If you're a previous owner, you can e-mail the publisher for a deep discount (nearly 60 percent) off the price.

Let's not forget this classic:

The bomb disposal scene drives home that point, one of my favourites, the Salvation Army band, bringing in the sheaves, never gets old https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjemOfZjs33AhWuhIkEHXcTAm8QuAJ6BAgGEAc&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D9pSD26bGy3I&usg=AOvVaw16n3DJhKY83pbW5Ln8opUr

great news, looking forward to the update

As Charlie posted, that link should help. I never had much luck with Cloud Shadows. Back in the day it was crashing the sim regularly. That was a LONG time ago, should be lots of posts to help

https://www.facebook.com/groups/togapjcts First post.......... they are "copatible"

Sirius vs. Love on a Real Train Nuff said

Timothy Treadwell said the same!

Harrisburg, like in the Kraftwerk song Radioactivity?

This is easy. 4.5 until they fix v5. Yes you can run v5 vanilla and, as noted here, it's performance is outstanding, but as soon as you start to add to it, you run the risk of CTD's. v5 is a different beast and everyone is still learning what's under the hood, including LM. Their forums are a mess of users expressing frustration multiple crashes and that's been going on for some time.

works from a client, yes or no?

The Bell Centre on the Montreal preview.......nice.............

https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/546685-carenado-pc-12-rxp-gtn750-and-rxp-gns530-resolved/ The RXP forums have a ton of information on gauge integration for specific aircraft

Gotcha. Thanks

Hi Bert, thanks for the reply. Well, I guess in looking at the setup, I see that you can choose longer dimensions so rather than have the 530 underneath the 750 I thought it would be nice to just have the 750 and nothing else. Where then does the 650 go? Are you saying that the 650 can't be installed as a replacement gauge unless its a pop up window? Guess I'm having trouble figuring out how the 650 goes into the 530 slot when they appear to be two different sizes. The 750 is perfect but as you've alluded, I may be stuck with the layout designed by Carenado

I realize this is a bit older in terms of information, but I have found it incredibly useful to help me install the 750 into the PC-12 2 Questions, 1) I purchased the 650 as well as the 750 at the start of June but I'm not quite sure how to install the 650. When I replicated the steps above (which was for the 530) I ended up with a display that was too large for the screen and so ultimately, I could not select any of the touch functions inside. Can someone help out with installing the 650? 2) More imporantly, is I'd like to have both of these units together, the 750 on top and the 650 below it. Can I install both that way, replacing the gauges that are already there? 2b) If I can only have the 750, can I increase its overall length to take up the space currently occupied by the 750 and the 530? So many questions, such little time JH

Lorby SI, Addon Organizer. Free. Does many of the exact same things. Simstarter is very good, but it has a lot of features I never bothered with. https://www.lorby-si.com/

I fiddled with some of the earlier Microsoft Simulators, but SubLogic ATP is what I consider my first. It wasn't even included in the review! Weak JH

Do you use Vector? There are a lot of posts on the Orbx site about this issue. I don't believe it's an FSX issue. Jh