Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'aig'.
Found 7 results
-
Hi all. I'm currently having an issue at busy European airports (Heathrow and Paris being the one's I've seen this in thus far). Namely there will be a sudden CTD. Each time it generally has this error log or some variation therein. I use AIG traffic, PMDG 777, and AI Companion. I'm not strictly sure where to go with this. Previous pages on the forums relate to P3D V3 and one fix is to use it in compatibility mode for windows 8, but I don't know if that will lead to performance loss, which is an issue I've been dealing on and off with for a bit. Signed Jon.
-
Hi folks, So, i wanted to ask a real-world aviation question, and, seeing as the Avsim Forums allow this in the "Hanger chat", i figured i'd take my oppertunity. So, i was generally browsing through the Avsim library, and saw all the "new season timetables" the Alpha India Group make, the traffic programme. Afterwords, i was browsing the "Famous Aviation website that has the first word of Airliners", and was wanting to know some scheds for the W12/13 British Airways Timetable. Next year, i really, REALLY, RREEAAALLLLYYYY want to go on a 77W, seeing as i have only ever been on the -200's. Now, i wish to go somewhere in the US, and, this is my problem: ANZ (ANZ001) : dont, really...want...to...go...to...LA, even if it is for a one night stop AAL : to DFW, dont really wanna head to Texas, a little TOOO warm.... (but if its the only chance) AC: Its possbale to go Air Canada, but, it would be quite expensive.... which only leaves BAW. So, the main question is, when do we get to know the new Summer 2013 Timetable for British Airways, or, roughly, when do we get to know most S13 timetables? And/or, if any people have any other suggestions for going on a 777-300ER (77W) to the USA, it would be greatfully appriciated. Furthermore: If i do manage to get on one, i think it'll have to be my first flight with the 777-300ER that PMDG will make, seeing as ill be re-creating my first 777-200ER flight when that expansion is released (BA, Gatwick-Orlando)
-
Cathay Pacific Airways Cargo PMDG 747-400F on decent to Heathrow early morning Dublin to Luton PMDG 737-800 Ryanair Gatwick Airport, Airbus Extended A32X Easyjet Over Thessaloniki Airbus Extended A32X Onur Air Dubai International PMDG 777-300ER Qatar Airways As a member of the team at Alpha India Group this is what you could have with some time and patience... UK2000 London Heathrow Airport 2014
-
Hey dear Avsim Community, my program says, that my path has more or at least 255 characters. When i wanted to move my directory, it worked fine! No problem. It tells me to restart the AI Manager, but when I restart it and go to the settings, the path is just empty. Does anyone can help me out. Thank you so much Greetings
-
Hi fellows, I installed AIG roughly 3 weeks ago for msfs. In cruise I even saw the contrails of the AI aircraft! All of a sudden after WU9 it seems AI traffic have lost their contrails? Can anyone confirm. Looking for fix as well. -
Hi All, I ran a few tests today on the CPU main thread performance both AIG Traffic Controller and PSXT have within MSFS and what I noted was interesting. Using the exact same scenario (no simulator reload) but comparing the performance between the two programs (using AIG models and repaints) showed PSXT seems to result in significantly higher main thread timings than AIG Traffic Controller. Two screenshots to demonstrate. PMDG 737-700. Loaded into iniScenes EGLL using clear weather and parked at gate 246 with a view of most of the airport. I've used AI Companion to display the number of AI aircraft being depicted in the SIM and limited it to meet PSXT's number of 70 AI aircraft. So we've got the same number of AI, at the same airport in exactly the same conditions, just being injected by different software. All aircraft are parked/static at the time of the test. With AIG Traffic Controller I'm getting a pretty consistent 37/38 FPS and a main thread processing time of between 25 and 26ms. Switching over to PSXT and with the same number of AI rendered (almost all parked static as you can see) I've dropped to 31/32 FPS and a main thread processing time of between 29 and 30ms. So my question is given the same number of AI are being depicted, why is the main thread burden caused by PSXT so might higher than AIG Traffic Controller? I would have thought that given the sim is having to render the same number of objects (and none of them are moving) the performance impact would be more or less the same. I replicated the same test at KLAX and YSSY with the same results - consistently higher mainthread and lower FPS using PSXT. Clearly there are advantages between the two....just interesting in why the performance difference? ANybody got any ideas? @Kaiii3 or @kiek Cheers, -
The following are shots from my FSX setup. Resolution has been lost somewhat sadly in the sceenshots... I am an internal member and beta tester at AIG (Alpha India Group) and FAIB (A32X Series, 737 Series, 747 in development). What you see here is a professional carefully built AI setup with material from AIG and its associated painters work. I use ORBX FTX England, Simwings Heathrow 2014 Xtended (ADE tweaked to my liking), REX Direct and ORBX BOB. This entire AI setup is self built with the latest flightplans and liveries. I do not use any AI programs like WOAI or Ultimate Traffic. I do not endorse Ice Traffic.
